Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tsunami Risk Of Asteroid Strikes Revealed
New Scientist ^ | 5-12-2006 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 05/12/2006 11:49:03 AM PDT by blam

Tsunami risk of asteroid strikes revealed

18:18 12 May 2006
NewScientist.com news service
Jeff Hecht

The researchers modelled the asteroid impact believed to have led to the demise of the dinosaurs – this frame shows tsunami wave heights 4 hours after the impact of the 10-kilomtre-wide asteroid (Image: Steve Ward)Related Articles

Tsunamis triggered by asteroid impacts cause a disaster similar to the 2004 Asian tsunami once every 6000 years on average, according to the first detailed analysis of their effects.

Researchers have assumed that tsunamis would make ocean impacts more deadly than those on land. But Steve Chesley at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, and Steve Ward at the University of California at Santa Cruz, both in the US, are the first to quantify the risks.

The pair first calculated the chance of various size asteroids reaching the Earth's surface, and then modelled the tsunamis that would result for asteroids that hit the oceans.

For example, the model shows that waves radiating from the impact of a 300-metre-wide asteroid would carry 300 times more energy than the 2004 Asian tsunami. You can view movies of impact simulations in the North Atlantic, South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Pacific (all in .mov format).

Fifty million people

To accurately assess the overall impact-tsunami risks, the analysis included the full range of asteroid sizes, including the smallest asteroids capable of penetrating the Earth's atmosphere. These are between 60 and 100 metres, depending on their composition.

The most common asteroids, between 100 m and 400 m, would yield tsunami waves up to 10 m when they arrived at the coast. A total of about 50 million coastal residents are vulnerable to such waves, though no single impact would affect them all. The researchers predict a tsunami-generating impact should occur about once every 6000 years, and would on average affect over one million people and cause $110 billion in property damage.

The study also showed that asteroid impacts in the 300-metre class might be similar to the huge tsunamis thrown up when massive chunks of rock break from the sides of volcanoes and fall into the ocean. These events are also thought to occur roughly once every 6000 years.

The analysis confirms suspicions that tsunamis are the biggest risk posed by asteroid impacts. The risks from climate effects of big impacts – through dust and smoke that blocks out the Sun – are about two-thirds that of tsunamis, while those of land impacts are about one-third of the tsunami risk.

Hurricane aspects

"There still are a lot of uncertainties," Chesley cautions. The solar system's population of 100 m to 400 m asteroids is poorly known, as are coastal population distributions. A big question is how the waves would behave when they reach the shore; successive wave peaks are much closer together in asteroid tsunamis than in earthquake tsunamis (see a simulation of an asteroid hitting the water, here).

But the ultimate uncertainty is when and where an asteroid might hit. "Asteroids sprinkle down pretty much at random," says Ward, "They don't pick out California or Florida."

And, like hurricanes, location is the key. Hurricane Katrina became America's worst natural disaster in living memory not because it was the biggest storm, but because it made a direct hit on vulnerable New Orleans.

But while hurricanes are difficult to predict, they do follow the same general paths. Asteroids come out of the blue – literally.

Journal reference: Natural Hazards (vol 38 p 355)


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asteroid; atlantis; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; of; revealed; risk; strikes; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: blam

hehe --

Our ***mountain*** home & property in Otto, NC becomes ocean-front property. 2910' ASL here baby!!!

We're safe, "too bad for you!"

Spoken with the Liberal mindset


21 posted on 05/12/2006 12:36:48 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

Especially bad news for Cuba!


22 posted on 05/12/2006 12:39:56 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...
Catastrophism

23 posted on 05/12/2006 12:47:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Since the bird flu bs isn't taking hold, I guess the mass media is gonna try and wip up asteroid hysteria (again).


24 posted on 05/12/2006 12:50:53 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Looks like New Orleans gets smacked by God ! Will FEMA come to the rescue . Can you surf in a school bus ??


25 posted on 05/12/2006 12:52:38 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I went to the article, looking for a legend and perhaps a time-lapse as far as this coastal inundation graphic, hoping to see some explanation as to the color coding. I assume it's wave height along the coastline, but then you've got the whitish areas going halfway up the Mississippi Valley, hundreds of miles inland. There has to be an elevation component to it, looking at the "islands" in TX, TN, MS, AL, GA and SC.


26 posted on 05/12/2006 12:53:11 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Play the QuickTime animations. Press the "pause" button when the legend pops up. Then memorize the color codings when you watch the animation. I think the highest waves (orage) were 65 meters high (200 ft).


27 posted on 05/12/2006 1:02:27 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

This story is made for George Carlin's Hippy Dippy Weatherman.


28 posted on 05/12/2006 1:03:10 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I did that, and unless I'm misinterpreting, none of those showed the effects on land. They stopped at the shoreline.


29 posted on 05/12/2006 1:04:35 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
It was the subject of this novel's opening:
30 posted on 05/12/2006 1:05:42 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

Also Footfall, except the aliens are using the rock to wpe us out.


31 posted on 05/12/2006 1:14:34 PM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Has this been proven by MIT scientists?

You mean like the one that got the "vapors" when Larry Summers said that there might be a difference between boys and girls?

"That" type of MIT scientist?

32 posted on 05/12/2006 1:15:24 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
You mean like the one that got the "vapors" when Larry Summers said that there might be a difference between boys and girls?

Yup,that's the kind.But be aware of the fact that these fine folks would be able to confirm the level of damage from having a chunk or stone 1/4 mile across fall on your head.

33 posted on 05/12/2006 1:16:13 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Now that you bring it up, wouldn't the energy of the initial impact break apart some quanity of H2O, causing additional
burning and other chemical reactions, such making HCl, with the additional heat bringing acid rain higher in to the atmosphere?

Not to discount the salts, but at some point, the vaporization would tend to leave behind the salts.

So, given the prevailing winds, the damage might be greatest immediately downwind of an impact. That's to say a Pacific
strike off of CA would do a number on their agricultural lands.

And while salt isn't effective below a certain temperature for melting ice, there would be the potential for increased
flooding from mountain snow packs too.

34 posted on 05/12/2006 1:28:03 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam

To paraphrase another Freeper's post a few months back, People who study oceans don't live near them.


35 posted on 05/12/2006 1:43:42 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Remember the Alamo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
Probably a translation of Botswana to Mandarin to Czek and then to English.
It makes sense not either to me also!
36 posted on 05/12/2006 1:49:11 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
If it was on my head, I would be beyond caring. However, there's that old joke about two "sophisticates" talking
about where they'd want to be when the "big one" goes off, trying to impress a farmer. Cut to the punch line, the
farmer replies that he would want to be where he could say "What was that?"

I would speculate that if my N/E/W/S "forty" was closer than that to the impact, I probably would want to know the level of damage...

37 posted on 05/12/2006 2:17:41 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Interesting. As far as this specific Gulf graphic, I find myself wondering about all that water, at least halfway up the Mississippi Valley, and the stress it would exert upon the New Madrid fault, too. As bad as the death and destruction from coastal inundation would be, it's slowly dawning upon me that it would just be the beginning.


38 posted on 05/12/2006 2:26:29 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam

New Orleans goes under again!


39 posted on 05/12/2006 2:39:59 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
"As bad as the death and destruction from coastal inundation would be, it's slowly dawning upon me that it would just be the beginning."

Yup. Have you considered the 'cosmic winter' that is sure to follow from all the sulfuric acid droplets blocking the sun for years.

40 posted on 05/12/2006 2:52:35 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson