Posted on 05/11/2006 10:42:18 PM PDT by xjcsa
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Zacarias Moussaoui was saved from a death sentence by a single juror who never explained his vote to other members of the jury that sent the September 11 conspirator to prison for life, The Washington Post reported on Friday.
The foreman of the 12-person federal jury told the newspaper that the panel voted 11-1, 10-2 and 10-2 in favor of the death penalty on the three charges for which Moussaoui was eligible for execution.
A unanimous vote on any one of the three terrorism charges was required to return a death sentence.
Moussaoui, 37, a French citizen of Moroccan descent, was sentenced on May 4 to spend the rest of his life in prison for his part in the hijacking plot that killed nearly 3,000 people.
The foreman, a Virginia math teacher who contacted the newspaper and spoke on condition of anonymity, said she voted for the death penalty because the government proved its case, the Post reported.
"I felt frustrated," the foreman said, "because I felt that many of us had been cheated by the anonymity of the 'no' voter. We will never know their reason. We will never be able to hold their reason up to the light and the scrutiny of evidence, fact, and law," she said.
She told The Washington Post that deliberations nearly broke down on the third day because of frustrations over repeated 11-1 votes on one charge while no one voiced objections during discussions.
April 26 "was a very intense day," she said. "But there was no yelling. It was as if a heavy cloud of doom had fallen over the deliberation room, and many of us realized that all our beliefs and our conclusions were being vetoed by one person."
Another juror, who spoke to newspaper after the verdict, said he voted for a life sentence because he believed that Moussaoui was a minor figure in the September 11 plot, but he did not reveal how the jury voted.
The foreman said most of the jurors did not give much weight to Moussaoui's testimony and thought some of his actions, including volunteering to testify for the prosecution, were "bizarre."
But she told the newspaper they did not believe the defense argument that Moussaoui was mentally ill.
"I think most of us found Moussaoui to be intelligent, smart, crafty and a great manipulator. Those were the comments that were frequently thrown around the table," she said.
That movie "12 Angry Men" strikes again. There is always one.
All it takes is one.
Probably a liberal democrat
oh you did say communist... liberal democrat/communist.. same/same
Sounds like someone was anti-death penalty from the beginning....even though they all said they were willing to pass that out during jury selection.
two out of three?
I'll agree with you on that. There are just too many people now against it, I don't know how they find 12 people for any jury who'll vote for death.
Probably a liberal democrat
I'll vote for all four rolled up into one big wad.
A male democrat.
My thought exactly.
Is that a sexist statement? :-)
Another juror, who spoke to newspaper after the verdict, said he voted for a life sentence because he believed that Moussaoui was a minor figure in the September 11 plot, but he did not reveal how the jury voted.
"i'll wager all of my worldly possessions that he was a muslim,atheist,or communist"
Could have been a Christian or a Jew, as well. The Catholic church is against the death penalty, you know.
I expect by the time his days are finished, Zach may have wished he had been executed.
Just like a typical liberal. Torpedoes the death penalty vote, then is too much of a coward to defend their position.
Too bad the sentence cannot be appealed. It's obvious that the defence had a ringer on the jury. That person had their mind made up before the trial even began.
I knew that. :-)
afraid so.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.