Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Freep Arlen Specter's office, all these Republican wimps office. These guys don't do their homework, I found this in an hour. The RATS come out with charges saying this is an impeachable offense and needs to be investigated but Bush followed the left wing court from 1979 precedent. I don't think this has been overturned either because Bank records and drivers license records are also not considered private either.
1 posted on 05/11/2006 9:24:27 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TheEaglehasLanded

looks like a good find, thanks


2 posted on 05/11/2006 9:26:17 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; ndt; oceanview; new yorker 77; sinkspur; SE Mom

Comments?


4 posted on 05/11/2006 9:30:20 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Wow. I agree with the three dissenting judges but on the surface this would appear to mean the established law is no expectation of privacy for any record kept about you that isn't physically on your property... finance records, phone records, Internet records ...anything.
8 posted on 05/11/2006 9:35:48 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
::Shepardizes::

It's been criticized, but as far as SCOTUS is concerned, it's still good law.

9 posted on 05/11/2006 9:36:11 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Molly Pitcher; Miss Marple; prairiebreeze; Peach; Howlin

ping


19 posted on 05/11/2006 9:53:51 PM PDT by kayak (Praying for MozartLover's son, Jemian's son, all our military, and our President every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

This entirely misses the point that there are numerous federal STATUTES that can be read to prohibit what the NSA is doing. Something doesn't have to be unconstitutional to be illegal.


46 posted on 05/12/2006 4:13:13 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Bush followed the left wing court from 1979 precedent.

You're confused. Federal statute is what protects our privacy interest in our phone records. Fourth Amendment case law is irrelevant.

49 posted on 05/12/2006 6:43:59 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

I'm sorry that this thread hasn't gotten more attention. Thanks for finding this.


52 posted on 05/13/2006 1:32:11 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

Bump for later!


54 posted on 07/26/2006 4:15:28 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson