To: TheEaglehasLanded
Wow. I agree with the three dissenting judges but on the surface this would appear to mean the established law is no expectation of privacy for any record kept about you that isn't physically on your property... finance records, phone records, Internet records ...anything.
8 posted on
05/11/2006 9:35:48 PM PDT by
gondramB
(He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
To: gondramB
All easily distinguishable. In this case, the government didn't look at the subject matter, which it would with all of that stuff; rather, they just determined that a call was made.
12 posted on
05/11/2006 9:37:37 PM PDT by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson