[Tim Long]

I still do not see the conflict between salvation and science.

We're not talking about theology. There is a conflict between real science and crap science (Darwinism). It's not a question of what God was capable of, it's a question of what He did.

[ndt]

"There is a conflict between real science and crap science (Darwinism)."

Yes, Evolution is has no rigorous scientific "proofs" like the "Banana Theory".

So, is this really the guy you want to argue your scientific evidence?

(video was posted by spetznaz on an previous thread but I just gotta pass it on)

[2ndreconmarine]

There is a conflict between real science and crap science (Darwinism).

And you know the difference?? Because you are a scientist?? Let's see. Knowing the average creationist on this forum, you have had what, high school science??

The sheer arrogance of you people is beyond belief. The best of you is a junior college all-star. None of you has a degree in science. None of you has ever worked as a scientist. Not one of you has ever published in science. Yet, you will argue with those of us who spent (nominally) a decade getting a Ph.D and have more publications each then the entire output of all creationists and all IDers combined.

Once upon a time, conservatives stood for hard work and accomplishment. We were proud of the fact that we worked harder, were better educated, and accomplished more than any liberal you could find.

Now, any bozo with a HS education can claim he knows real science.

[aliquando]

Exactly. I am just tired of the perception that G_d and science are in conflict.

[aliquando]

The conflict is really between micro-evolution and macro-evolution.