Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Gets Tough On Illegal Immigrant Employers
THE INDY CHANNEL ^ | 10 MAY 2006 | AP

Posted on 05/10/2006 11:06:19 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

WASHINGTON -- Employers would have to check Social Security numbers and the immigration status of all new hires under a tentative Senate agreement on toughening sanctions against people who provide jobs to illegal immigrants.

Those who don't and who hire an illegal immigrant would be subject to fines of $200 to $6,000 per violation.

Employers found to have actually hired illegal immigrants once an electronic system for the checks is in place could be fined up to $20,000 per unauthorized worker and even sentenced to jail for repeat offenses.

What to do with people who hire illegal immigrants has been one of the stumbling points in putting together a broad immigration bill that tightens borders, but also addresses the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants now in the United States.

Congress left it to employers to ensure they were hiring legal workers when they passed an immigration law in 1986 and provided penalties for those who didn't. But the law was not strictly enforced and the market grew for fraudulent documents.

Senate Republicans and Democrats are hoping this week to reach a compromise on more contentious parts of the immigration bill so they can vote on it before Memorial Day.

The employer sanctions were negotiated separately from other parts of the broader bill after some senators raised concerns about privacy of tax information, liability of employers and worker protections.

Employers are wary of the system Congress wants them to use and say it would be unreliable.

"What's going to happen when you have individuals legally allowed to work in the United States, but they can't confirm it?" asked Angelo Amador, director of immigration policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Critics say expanding a Web-based screening program, now used on a trial basis by about 6,200 employers, to cover everyone might create a version of the no-fly lists used for screening airline passengers after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Infants and Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts were among people barred from boarding a plane because names identical to their own were on a government list of suspected terrorists.

"This will be the no-work list," predicted Tim Sparapani, attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union.

Last year, employers in the trial screening program submitted names and identifying information on more than 980,000 people. Of them, about 148,000 were flagged for further investigation. Only 6,202 in that group were found to be authorized to work.

U.S. citizens could come up as possible illegal workers if, for example, they change their last names when they marry but fail to update Social Security records.

All non-citizens submitted to the system are referred to the Homeland Security Department, even if their Social Security number is valid.

A bill passed by the House would impose stiff employer sanctions, but does not couple them with a guest worker program, drawing opposition from business. The bill also would give employers six years to screen all previously hired employees still on the payroll as well as new hires - altogether, about 140 million people.

The Senate agreement proposes screening all new hires but only a limited number of people hired previously -specifically, those who have jobs important to the nation's security.

Negotiating the Senate agreement are Republican Sens. Jon Kyl of Arizona and Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democrats Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, Barack Obama of Illinois and Max Baucus of Montana.

Their plan would give employers 18 months to start using the verification system once it is financed. It would create a process for workers to keep their jobs and be protected from discrimination while contesting a finding that they are not authorized to work.

To check compliance and fight identity theft, the legislation would allow the Homeland Security Department limited access to tax and Social Security information.

The Social Security Administration, for example, would give homeland security officials lists of employers who submit large numbers of employees who are not verified as legal workers. The Internal Revenue Service would provide those employers' tax identification numbers, names and addresses.

Social Security also would share lists of Social Security numbers repeatedly submitted to the verification system for different jobs.

The senators also want to increase the number of work site investigators to 10,000, a 50-fold increase. President Bush asked Congress in January to provide more than $130 million to expand the trial system. That's not expected to be enough.

Posse Set To Roll

Beginning Wednesday in Arizon's Maricopa County, a 250-member posse will operate similarly to the county's official anti-smuggler task force, patrolling the area for illegal immigrants who pay smugglers to cross through Arizona, the busiest illegal entry point along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border.

The posse will be made up of existing sheriff's deputies and members of the department's 3,000-member posse reserve of trained, unpaid volunteers.

Those who are captured by the posse may end up in jail, charged under a state law that has been used against more than 100 illegal immigrants in Maricopa County this year.

The law made human smuggling a state crime in Arizona - it was already a federal crime - allowing local law enforcement agencies to arrest suspected smugglers. It was meant to crack down on smugglers, but under a disputed interpretation, County Attorney Andrew Thomas argues the law can be applied to the smuggled immigrants themselves.

Thomas maintains illegal immigrants who pay smugglers to enter the United States are committing conspiracy to smuggle and can therefore be prosecuted under the state law.

The sheriff's office began arresting illegal immigrants under that interpretation in March, and with the new posse, will continue doing so by patrolling desert areas and main roadways in the southwestern part of the county.

"I'm going to catch as many as I can and throw them in my jail," said Sheriff Joe Arpaio. "And the jails are not that nice."

It remains to be seen whether a judge will uphold the smuggling law as applicable to illegal immigrants. Lawyers for some arrested illegal immigrants have filed motions to have the charges dismissed.

A Los Angeles attorney brought into the case by the Mexican Consul General's Office in Phoenix filed another motion claiming Thomas and Arpaio are violating state and federal law and are using the conspiracy charges to control illegal immigration, which is the federal government's job.

Arpaio said the motions don't worry him.

"I get sued when I go to the toilet. You think I'm worried about it?" he said. "If they think I'm going to slow down because of these threats, I've got news for them - I'm not going to slow down. I'll do more of it."

Alfredo Gutierrez, a Hispanic activist and former Democratic state senator, called Thomas' interpretation of the law and Arpaio's use of it "political pranks."

"Every act like this contributes to the angst and anger and desperation in our community," Gutierrez said.

Elias Bermudez, president of the pro-immigrant group Inmigrantes Sin Fronteras, or Immigrants Without Borders, questions the legality of the immigration posse itself.

"It is racial profiling," he said. "They don't follow guys that are blond and blue-eyed."

Bermudez said Arpaio is "a good criminal sheriff, but he needs to go out there and find criminals. He wants to go after the poor, undocumented immigrant who is hungry and thirsty in the desert. That is totally inhumane."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrationreform; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
...Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts were among people barred from boarding a plane because names identical to their own were on a government list of suspected terrorists....

BWAHAHAHAHAHA...

21 posted on 05/10/2006 11:17:55 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Mr. Franklin, what form of customes did you create in Tiajunna? A beeber, Madam, if you can stune it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
This sounds like a good first step. As a legal immigrant, I can relate to the employment verification. Most white collar-type professionals here on work visas have to gen SSN's in order to work. I was robbed last year and had my SS card stolen. Because I'm on a work visa, the Social Security Administration had to copies of ALL of my visa documents to Homeland Security for verification. It took about 3 months for my replacement card to arrive in the mail.

My only issue with the manadatory SSN checks is this. Does the system only check to see if the name and number match? If so, then the system won't work well. Identity theft will be rampant like it is already. There are cases of hundreds of illegals using the same matching SSN and name. Like the story in Utah recently where several 3 and 4 year old children allegedly had dozens of full time jobs because illegals got a hold of their names and SSN's. THere is nothing in the system to check the age of the person and that the person working really is the the person in the Social Security records.

22 posted on 05/10/2006 11:18:18 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Once again the Feds throw the burden of their failures on to the back of business owners. If they closed the borders and rounded up the illegals this wouldn't be a problem.

If this is enforced it will also create a big boom in identity theft. Be prepared to find out that you are picking produce somewhere in addition to your current job and that you failed to pay some utilities and rent.

23 posted on 05/10/2006 11:18:27 AM PDT by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I doubt SS would accept that as a valid number. Don't they cross-check numbers?


24 posted on 05/10/2006 11:18:37 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RolandBurnam

our senate getting tough ?

wheww..

im sure no one is afraid


25 posted on 05/10/2006 11:19:34 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God makes us strong for alittle while so that we can protect the weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

And who is to blame?


26 posted on 05/10/2006 11:19:47 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
It took me nearly 40 minutes to check a SS number for a M. Martinez. Turns out the government employee said the number was legit. I asked her how many M. Martinez' there were, thousands she said. I asked how do I know this is the correct # for M. Martinez? She said there was no way of knowing for sure. Meanwhile, I let the guy go after 1 week. Caught him doing drugs while waiting for his first paycheck in the parking lot. Doh!
27 posted on 05/10/2006 11:20:13 AM PDT by poobear (The most critical job that Americans will not do (just illegals): Vote for Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

well of course, you are right to be skeptical. but what else can you do? rounding up 12 million people using law enforcement techniques and the courts system - isn't practical either.

unless you provide some disincentives for many of these people to be able to stay, so that they return home, you are stuck with either the status quo, or the worse idea of granting them amnesty.


28 posted on 05/10/2006 11:20:47 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

"Current system is "voluntary"."

I just went to Google and typed in "SSN check". I got back 15 secuirty companies and 1 listing for the SS administration. The SS admin site told me my SSN was confidential but didn't give any option to check it. Maybe I'll try their main website.


29 posted on 05/10/2006 11:20:54 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Racer1
Those who don't and who hire an illegal immigrant would be subject to fines of $200 to $6,000 per violation.

Per violation per day employed would be a better idea. That would make them get rid of the illegal, or they'd be paying enough in fines to make benefit of employing the illegal impossible to justify.

30 posted on 05/10/2006 11:20:57 AM PDT by b4its2late (If it's treason, there's no doubt a democrat is standing behind it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

And the current system only verifies that a name and SS number match. It does not verify identity so an illegal needs only someone else's name and SSN when they get a job. The employer can't be charged with hiring an illegal since the name and SSN match.


31 posted on 05/10/2006 11:20:58 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I recall on some other threads, the number of SS taxes paid to the all zeroes number, is astounding.


32 posted on 05/10/2006 11:21:28 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

Do you have any proof of that? I read it was required.


33 posted on 05/10/2006 11:22:07 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

exactly right - american citizens who fear a new more secure social security card, they must be living someplace else - because to function legally in the US across a wide range of activities, requires significant amounts of identification.


34 posted on 05/10/2006 11:22:59 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Throw them in jail (not the country club type either). By "them", I mean the company owners/executives, as well as the managers or whoever that hired them.

It would cause the jobs for illegals to start going away real fast, which would do a lot to curb illegal immigration.
35 posted on 05/10/2006 11:23:21 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
"And who is to blame?" Those who have not enforced our immigration laws for all of these years.
36 posted on 05/10/2006 11:23:36 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Tagline removed per Admin. Moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
The SS admin site told me my SSN was confidential but didn't give any option to check it. Maybe I'll try their main website.

All they can do is match name with number. They will not tell you your sources of income so you don't know if someone is using your number until the IRS wants lots of back taxes and fines for not reporting all your income on your tax return.

37 posted on 05/10/2006 11:23:50 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

000-00-000 is a big govt secret that most people do not know about. When an illegal goes to a hospital for medical care 000-00-000 is also input there. That number is a sure giveaway that the person is here illegally.


38 posted on 05/10/2006 11:23:59 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Even if its enforced, it won't do much good with the BOARDERS OPEN!

Please excuse the yelling.

39 posted on 05/10/2006 11:24:24 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Holy shi'ite Osama, what the F-15 was that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

They won't finance it when the time comes.


40 posted on 05/10/2006 11:24:46 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson