Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

Doesn't it make sense? Do you think the Founding Fathers meant for the states (or individuals) to be able to undermine and subvert Congress' interstate regulatory efforts this way?


225 posted on 05/16/2006 6:03:26 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
"Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. "


226 posted on 05/16/2006 6:06:28 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
Do you think the Founding Fathers meant for the states (or individuals) to be able to undermine and subvert Congress' interstate regulatory efforts this way?

I respect their wisdom enough to think they were well aware that by denying Congress the authority to regulate intrastate activity they were making SOME interstate regulatory efforts less effective.

232 posted on 05/17/2006 3:42:14 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson