Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN agrees to give Iran choice of carrot or stick
The Daily Telegraph ^ | May 10, 2006 | Alec Russell

Posted on 05/10/2006 1:27:14 AM PDT by MadIvan

The major United Nations powers last night agreed to offer Iran a stark choice of benefits or sanctions in the latest international gambit to persuade Teheran to abandon its nuclear ambitions.

The initiative followed the failure of talks between the foreign ministers of Russia, China, France, Britain, America and Germany to resolve the deadlock on how to confront Iran.

The "carrot or stick" plan came as US officials conceded that their hopes of pushing through this week a UN resolution mandating Iran's suspension of its nuclear enrichment programme were over.

"I think the prospects for an agreement this week are not substantially good,' said a senior US official after the end of the late-night talks. "Clearly we had a way to go.'

Diplomats from Britain, France and Germany, the EU powers who have been spearheading negotiations with Iran, will now draw up a list of possible benefits and sanctions, a European official said.

The latest discussions came as details emerged of the 18-page letter sent by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran to President George W Bush.

This was hailed in Iran as the first direct communication between leaders of the two countries since the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 and as a way to resolve the crisis.

But American officials dismissed it as a diversionary tactic after it emerged that it was a rambling treatise which focused on America's record and had no suggestions for ending the dispute over Iran's nuclear programme.

"This letter isn't it," said Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state. "It isn't addressing the issues that we are dealing with in a concrete way."

The major obstacle to an agreement on a resolution was Moscow, as expected, diplomats said. Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said that everyone was agreed that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon and that Moscow was keen to draw Iran into "fruitful" negotiations.

But Russia and China are against a resolution that would require Iran to halt its enrichment, arguing that could be the first step down the road to authorising military action - a point strongly denied by the European drafters of the resolution.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; limpwristed; nevillechamberlain; nukes; pantywaisted; un; vacillation; weakness
I am thoroughly sick of this.

Regards, Ivan

The Sietch Banner

1 posted on 05/10/2006 1:27:20 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; agrace; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/10/2006 1:27:47 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"The major United Nations powers last night agreed to offer Iran a stark choice of benefits or sanctions in the latest..."

Looks like they're planning another oil for food personal enrichment scheme.

3 posted on 05/10/2006 1:28:48 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Whether they have a carrot or a stick, we have no problem helping them place it where the sun don't shine if they don't quit acting like little terrorist.


4 posted on 05/10/2006 1:29:10 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Looks like they're planning another oil for food personal enrichment scheme.

You got that right. There's TONS of money to be made (again) there.

5 posted on 05/10/2006 1:31:39 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
we have no problem helping them place it where the sun don't shine if they don't quit acting like little terrorist.

Don't we?

6 posted on 05/10/2006 2:26:38 AM PDT by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"This letter isn't it," said Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state. "It isn't addressing the issues that we are dealing with in a concrete way."

Why couldn't it be an opening? Bush could quote the scriptures right back at Ahmajihading. With emphasis on Judgment Day.

7 posted on 05/10/2006 2:30:36 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

We lose, Mullahs win.

Bush fails.


8 posted on 05/10/2006 4:28:58 AM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

Grrrr


9 posted on 05/10/2006 4:58:37 AM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

The United Nations is FREAKIN WORTHLESS.


10 posted on 05/10/2006 5:06:17 AM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I'm looking for either Russia or China(possibly both)... to openly state they will offer assistance to Iran... should the US and it's 'coalition-of-the-willing' decide to strike. That type of rhetoric would send whoever is with us running for the exits faster than you can say Munich.


11 posted on 05/10/2006 5:09:24 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan

This won't matter, since Iran wants a war and will not make concessions in any event.


13 posted on 05/10/2006 5:50:24 AM PDT by Maceman (Fake but accurate, and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silentknight

Oh come on! This attitude is unjustified! Don't you know that there are some very important people involved in negotiations over this, and that if we just give them more TIME, they will come up with a solution that will convince Iran to give up on nuclear development? Sure, it may take 2-3 years for all the talking to produce an agreement with Iran, but shouldn't we be patient and give the diplomatic process time to work?

/sarcasm off

I think we're going to have to go it alone on this one. President Bush sees through all the BS and knows that time is of the essence in stopping Iran's "nucular" ambitions. President Bush should send Abominationajad a reply letter telling him that he has two options for his country - they can either be a peaceful ally to the US or they can have their economy transformed overnight into the world's largest supplier of glass products.


14 posted on 05/10/2006 6:03:45 AM PDT by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Hey why not? I mean it worked so well in North Korea.


15 posted on 05/10/2006 7:11:23 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozoneliar

No we do not. It is a matter of when, not if unless they quit the nuclear stuff without control.
Their wonderful obliteration of Israel talk doesn't help either IMO.


16 posted on 05/10/2006 11:50:57 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson