Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm more upset with Conservatives than I am with George W. Bush

Posted on 05/08/2006 7:04:26 PM PDT by mwfsu84

If I had told you on 9/11/2001 that we'd go four and half years and counting without another terrorist attack on US soil, would you have believed me?

If I had told you that US-led forces would secure Afghanistan in just a few months...something the Soviets couldn't accomplish in ten years...would you have thought I was crazy?

If I had told you that Saddam was gone, that Khadaffy had renounced terrorism, and that Iraq was on the verge of becoming the second democracy in the Middle East, would have thought I was on medication?

Sometimes in our disappointment of this administration, we often forget some of the positives. The economy is strong. More Americans are homeowners. With tax cuts, we're spending less time working for Uncle Sam.

And if you take those benefits for granted, just imagine how much different things would be under a President Al Gore.

So if the president's stance on immigration and spending upset you - and they do upset me - what are you going to do about it? Stay at home? Nothing could be worse for conservativism. Your non-support will usher in more immigrants, higher taxes, and weaker national security.

If the GOP loses Congress, George W. Bush will be removed from office. Nothing would embolden terrorists more. How can we be counted on to wage an effective war when we can't even decide who our enemy is?

George W. Bush isn't the enemy. But that's exactly the message conservatives will send to the world if they stay at home this November.

If you're upset with W. on immigration - write him, write a Republican Congressman, let him know how you feel. It was conservatives who got Bush to change his mind on Harriet Meirs.

I promise you, a Democratic Congress won't be nearly as responsive to your needs.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: notaweinerbot; notstuckonstupid; patronizing; reaganhaters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,201-1,204 next last
To: ohioWfan

Go to BED!

Trust me, this fight will still be here in the morning. LOL.


881 posted on 05/08/2006 11:23:49 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 831 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369

Like I said, there's no one on FR who knows ALL of my principles...least of all you. So stop pretending like you know me.


882 posted on 05/08/2006 11:24:01 PM PDT by ilovew (Democrat enablers are not conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Exactly.


883 posted on 05/08/2006 11:24:17 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: ilovew
Voting for Hillary guarantees that you will have a socialist agenda

Can you paste to me where I ever advocated voting for Hillary? I have yet to see that from anyone. Certainly NOT from me.

884 posted on 05/08/2006 11:25:20 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

LOL!


885 posted on 05/08/2006 11:25:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Sure you do. Everybody here knows it.

Oh, please. The argument to vote 3rd party if that candidate is more conservative than the Republican candidate is not a new one, and it does not attack anyone's principles to say so. My point is that when two people have the same set of principles; but only one of them votes for the candidate that supports those principles...what is wrong with the other person? Voting against your principles supports a perverted idea of what democracy is all about.

886 posted on 05/08/2006 11:25:47 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"What's wrong about that? The democrats that are now in office are the farthest left in our history. They hate this country and prove it daily."

The problem is the republicans aren't good. They are two steps to the right of the democrats on every major issue except tax cuts. The choice between 100% evil and 60% is no choice because eventually were going to hell, its all a matter of how fast we get there.

Vote out Rinos, and give any donations to conservative Republican candidates directly.
887 posted on 05/08/2006 11:25:50 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Yes, that does seem to be the case.


888 posted on 05/08/2006 11:25:51 PM PDT by ilovew (Democrat enablers are not conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: ilovew
I don't believe there's anyone on FR who knows all of my principles.

Doesn't much matter; somebody will be right along to tell you they're wrong........LOL.

889 posted on 05/08/2006 11:26:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
The 'rats may try, [impeach Bush] but it will never happen

they know that and it doesn't matter.

What matters is that the proceedings would drag on for the rest of his term - and do in the Republicans...they hope.

At any rate, such proceedings would cripple the nation in a time of war - and with Iran threatening to blow at any time - we do not need these shenanigans - nor such surface thinking as is going on with fair weather pseudo-conservatives

890 posted on 05/08/2006 11:26:32 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369


DO THAT IN YOUR OWN STATE FIRST!


891 posted on 05/08/2006 11:26:49 PM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Very true.


892 posted on 05/08/2006 11:28:42 PM PDT by ilovew (Democrat enablers are not conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369
Vote out Rinos, and give any donations to conservative Republican candidates directly.

That sounds so easy BUT it is not possible. The fact is....you have to have conservative voters to elect conservative candidates. I am not talking primaries but the general. You will not elect a red meat conservative in the states that now house what you call "RINOS". The voters themselves are "RINOS".

893 posted on 05/08/2006 11:29:47 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
this is The United States of America, and it will go on no matter who is President

It will go "on" under the UN.

894 posted on 05/08/2006 11:29:49 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
Yes I get it, but you don't understand my point. Don't tackle me when I'm running with the ball and I'm on your team.

I'm not advocating my point as the message we must get out to voters...I'm simply stating facts. Re-read, please.

895 posted on 05/08/2006 11:29:52 PM PDT by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 879 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002; ilovew
Can you paste to me where I ever advocated voting for Hillary? I have yet to see that from anyone. Certainly NOT from me.

She DIDN'T say that. Quit trolling for a flame war.

896 posted on 05/08/2006 11:29:54 PM PDT by onyx (Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002

Sorry, I didn't mean you personally, I meant in a general sense.


897 posted on 05/08/2006 11:30:20 PM PDT by ilovew (Democrat enablers are not conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies]

To: onyx
You better believe I am. I'm actually considering voting for the democratic Governor just so the republican, who agrees with democrats on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE, (so much so the chicago political machine backed her). But then again I'd feel dirty voting democrat, so I'll just probably under vote for that office.

BTW the reason my state went from a republican leaning state to solid blue is a constant flow of illegals, that either vote illegally or were part of prior amnesties. Its a shame many here are willing to it to their own states.
898 posted on 05/08/2006 11:30:34 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Amen!! Amen! Amen!


899 posted on 05/08/2006 11:31:16 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: mwfsu84
Well, Bush in in office, and voting against Republicans to get back at him is a foolish strategy. But one thing people object to is the whole "love Bush" message. They may accept him, but don't want to be pushed further than that.

The other thing is, what happens when the next G.W. Bush comes around? Are people simply going to rush to support a candidate who may be an unknown quantity or far from perfect? It looks like something similar will happen in 2008 or in subsequent elections.

"Ideal" or "ideologically pure" candidates are rare. Most of the time one just picks the least of the evils. But I'd like to hope that the President's strongest supporters have learned something from the experience of recent years -- if nothing else, at least to be clear-eyed about these things, and not pretend candidates are different from what they are.

900 posted on 05/08/2006 11:31:19 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,201-1,204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson