[linda_22003]

I agree that one's "sexual habits are a private matter", so I'm not too thrilled to read about the people in the article who don't share that opinion, but who think their "morals" should drive what everyone else does.

[G.Mason]

" ... I'm not too thrilled to read about the people in the article who don't share that opinion, but who think their "morals" should drive what everyone else does."

I agree.

Of course having no morals would lead to a very uncomfortable existence. It would encourage such things as homosexual parades, people killing people in the streets, masses of illegal aliens crossing our borders, rapes, and false rape charges ... Oh ... wait. These things are going on.

Inasmuch as most all recognized religions (even in Islam) have in them, or something similar to the Christian "Ten Commandments" (Decalogue), perhaps they should be taught and an attempt to follow them be encouraged?

[Cacique]

Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us.