To: linda_22003; Clemenza; Coleus; neverdem; firebrand
Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us.
![](http://members.aol.com/tristartel/FR/patoruzubk.jpg)
15 posted on
05/07/2006 1:17:17 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
17 posted on
05/07/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT by
Coleus
(I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic)
To: Cacique
The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution.
Do you sound this stuff out loud before you type it Komrade?
18 posted on
05/07/2006 2:32:49 PM PDT by
SandfleaCSC
( “Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy.”)
To: Cacique
"Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us." I have rarely read a paragraph with more errors-per-word.
I am a private person and my consensual behavior with another adult is, literally, none of your business. No rationalizing on your part can change that and no minor-league jesuitical discourse will alter it.
28 posted on
05/07/2006 2:57:31 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: Cacique
Read much WWII history? You sound like a Nazi.
In your world, does the state exist to serve the individual, or does the individual exist to serve the state?
41 posted on
05/07/2006 4:10:35 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Cacique
>>Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance.<<
So if a husband or wife has fertility problems you believe that is a public matter?
47 posted on
05/07/2006 4:19:23 PM PDT by
gondramB
(He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
To: Cacique
Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us.
Wow.
If one were to set out to develop a philosophical viewpoint tailor made to justify maximum governmental intrusion into our personal lives at the expense of individual liberty, one would be hard pressed to come up with one better than this. The implications are, to put it mildly, appalling.
Imagine, if you would, a government with this viewpoint, run by the likes of Hildebeast.
-Eric
188 posted on
05/10/2006 4:21:06 AM PDT by
E Rocc
(Behavior that is rewarded is repeated)
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
191 posted on
05/13/2006 7:02:05 AM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson