Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: linda_22003; Clemenza; Coleus; neverdem; firebrand
Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us.



15 posted on 05/07/2006 1:17:17 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


17 posted on 05/07/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique
The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution.




Do you sound this stuff out loud before you type it Komrade?
18 posted on 05/07/2006 2:32:49 PM PDT by SandfleaCSC ( “Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique
"Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us."

I have rarely read a paragraph with more errors-per-word.

I am a private person and my consensual behavior with another adult is, literally, none of your business. No rationalizing on your part can change that and no minor-league jesuitical discourse will alter it.

28 posted on 05/07/2006 2:57:31 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique
Read much WWII history? You sound like a Nazi.

In your world, does the state exist to serve the individual, or does the individual exist to serve the state?

41 posted on 05/07/2006 4:10:35 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique

>>Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance.<<

So if a husband or wife has fertility problems you believe that is a public matter?


47 posted on 05/07/2006 4:19:23 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique
Your sexual habist and practices are not a private matter. They are quite public when they either do not produce reproductive results or do so in abudance. The death of western civilisation is toi a large extent due to the attitude that what one does in private has no public or general effect on society. Quite the opposite is of course true. The "right to privacy" is a modern bourgeois concept that doesn't even exist in the constitution. Societies have a primal imperative to assure their own perpetuation. It has been so since the dawn of mankind. Those societies that become lax in that respect, become extinct as did the Romans and other civilisations before us.
Wow.

If one were to set out to develop a philosophical viewpoint tailor made to justify maximum governmental intrusion into our personal lives at the expense of individual liberty, one would be hard pressed to come up with one better than this. The implications are, to put it mildly, appalling.

Imagine, if you would, a government with this viewpoint, run by the likes of Hildebeast.

-Eric

188 posted on 05/10/2006 4:21:06 AM PDT by E Rocc (Behavior that is rewarded is repeated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

ping


191 posted on 05/13/2006 7:02:05 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson