Posted on 05/07/2006 9:53:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
A "blogstorm" is thundering across liberal Web sites. Many liberals are furious at the White House press corps for virtually ignoring Stephen Colbert's keynote speech at the press corp's own White House Correspondents' Dinner last Saturday. To non-liberals, this may seem like an isolated complaint. To liberals, it further justifies their belief that the media, particularly TV news, is a big stinking cabal of conservatives.
The truth is many in the media wrote about Bush's stand-up routine at the dinner as if they had just watched the coming of a comic genius, but they didn't report much on Colbert's funnier, harsher jokes. This may have been a case of the press corps following a standard motto: to the winner goes the spoils, and Bush got more laughs (out of copy written for him) than Colbert did.
How did Bush tickle reporters? He made fun of the fact that he can barely speak English (he is quite simply the worst communicator of all U.S. presidents), that our vice president is a heartless face-shooter, and that Bush is basically an idiot.
Ha ha, our "war president" knows he's a village idiot? To members of the White House press corps, that's some real funny stuff. To non-insiders, this looked like another example of good old boys and gals slapping each other on the back.
Colbert's routine was more remarkable for its unique and creative brazenness. He joked that Bush's presidency is like the Hindenburg; that Bush's wiretappers were monitoring this very event, and that the White House press corps, sitting in front of Colbert, gave Bush a free pass, scandal after scandal, until recently (when his polls numbers dropped).
How's this for a newsworthy lead? It was perhaps the first time in Bush's tenure that the president was forced to sit and listen to any American cite the litany of criminal and corruption allegations that have piled up against his administration. And mouth-tense Bush and first lady Laura Bush fled as soon as possible afterward.
From whom were they fleeing? A star comedian pretending to be a Fox News-like blowhard doing a sort of performance art that America hasn't witnessed nationally since the days of Andy Kaufman. Even if Colbert's bit had been reported as a train wreck, that would have sufficed. Instead, shocking lines like the following were barely covered by any traditional organ except industry magazine Editor & Publisher: "I stand by" Bush, Colbert cracked, "because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble, and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world."
For TV reporters in particular to quote that gruesome line would be an agreement with Colbert, that they helped Bush mix politics with corruption from the ashes of 9/11 ("aircraft carriers and rubble"), and failed to see through Bush's politicization of the drowning of an American city after a hurricane ("recently flooded city squares").
But ignoring a newsworthy keynote speech -- at an event the press corps itself set up -- doesn't go unnoticed anymore. Internet stables for liberals, like the behemoth dailykos.com, began rumbling as soon as the correspondents' dinner was reported in the mainstream press, with scant word of Colbert's combustive address.
This is trouble for the media. It has been losing customers to bloggers and Web sites for years. This won't help. The media's implosion of silence could be one of the final reasons many liberals use to not turn on TV news. It's not like they feel a vested interest in the industry anyway, since it has been bought and parceled by conservatives.
There is Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, that Pravda of GOP propaganda and breeding ground for Bush appointees. There are the networks' Sunday news shows that give more face time to Republicans. There are cable news channels like MSNBC, where Republicans have programmed the shows and hired on-air Republicans and conservatives-lite, from Tucker Carlson to Joe Scarborough and Chris Matthews. Some TV watchdogs even chronicle these conservative media daily, backed up by transcripts and video clips from TV news shows, in the expansive Web site, MediaMatters.com.
On cable, only CNN still plays the journalism-school middle ground most of the time, questioning liberals, moderates and conservatives with equal skepticism and respect. Clearly, in terms of advertising revenue, CNN alone cares to attract the disposable income of American viewers of all political stripes.
To liberals, this must be somewhat puzzling, since the rest of the conservative media primarily sides with a president whose approval ratings stand at 32 percent, a whisker better than Nixon's before he resigned in disgrace.
Liberals find true solace on TV only in the fake news of Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report" and "The Daily Show," a place where Jon Stewart merely has to show actual clips of Bush speaking, or Condi Rice, or Cheney, or Donald Rumsfeld to elicit laughter at their hubris. If NBC News let in audiences during its broadcasts, those people might also laugh at the president.
But the TV news corps, the unthinking and unblinking herd of pack journalists, prefer to laugh with the president, and kiss many viewers goodbye.
mailto:delfman@suntimes.com
And for some one to pull a fire alarm, call in a bomb threat or even sneak Code Pink in with a banner...any of those would have been funnier than Colbert.
For a professional television critic to believe that Chris Matthews is in any way a conservative just underscores what a load of crap this article is. I'm glad you posted it, it shows how far over the edge some of the lunatics really are...lol
"... and hired on-air Republicans and conservatives-lite, from Tucker Carlson to Joe Scarborough and Chris Matthews"
This moron doesn't even know that Chris Matthews is a liberal Democrat who worked for Tip O'Neill.
Elf-person doesnt get it. Colbert's speil was barely mentioned and panned because he was hired as a comedian and he wasnt that funny. That's all. There was no conspiracy to make Colbert un-funny, he just did it himself.
Thing with Helen Thomas? ... WORST. SKIT. EVER.
Bitterness is never funny.
But thinking MSNBC is conservative?
Now THAT'S funny.
I've never appreciated comics whose acts consist of alternating snide comments and smirking stares toward their audiences or cameras.
Look, I for one USED to LOVE Colbert UNTIL that mean fiasco last week!!! I was STUNNED at how m=viciously un-funny Colbert was. I had thought he might be a moderate Republican!! FOOL!!! Foolish me.
Yeah, I'm with you. My point is that Bush is very like Truman.
Colbert's humor is like putting flaming bags of dog poop on the doorstep and ringing the bell. Such is the depth of liberal elites. Take DUers for example. They spend half their days thinking up cutesy nicknames for the Bush family and admin. It's like a particularly bad 3rd grade class.
....and Jimmah Carter, who was the WORST PRESIDENT IN MY LIFETIME.
Agreed - Mr. Peanut was the worst in many lifetimes closely followed by El-BJ and Slick Willie.
"Another Bush hater" .. Apparently so.
I guess he expected the the press to expound on the rude, and yes "brazen..." antics of Colbert.
To me .. the guy was boring. It wasn't a comic routine .. and in truth .. the President was much, much funnier. His alter ego WAS SAYING ALL THE THINGS THAT THE PRESIDENT WANTED TO SAY .. but he's constrained by his position.
I especially loved, "screw 'em"! That was one of the very best lines.
Nobody noticed what happened with the last 5 seconds after the program.
Bush actually shook Colbert's hand, turned around and RAN, not walked. It was a direct insult to Colbert.
It happened so quickly, nobody noticed it.
He nailed the "feel-good" rhetoric that's been coming out of the White House, and is even someitmes repeated in the press. He thrashed the empty verbiage like Thank You for Smoking thrashed the anti-tobacco crusade. He had a few stinkers, but his points struck home. The media aren't reporting it because he made them look bad, and he made them know it.
Wow. I honestly thought I was the only person on FR to appreciate Colbert's act.
Good to know I'm not alone.
The question still remains, why does this bozo Elfman feel the need for this rescue mission.
OK, this is something like the third time lately that I've heard this dailykos.com website referred to as some kind of humongous, "must-see" website. Does it even have half the members - let alone the traffic - of Free Republic? Anyone know?
i don't understand this. He shook his hand and that was supposed to be an insult? If he hadn't shook his hand and then "ran" away, that would be an insult....am I missing something?
Star comedian? I've never heard of him.
I think (at least part of) the point was that this was the time for comedy, not a highly-political harangue against the administration. It wasn't funny except to the far-left moonbats. The near-left moonbats in the audience barely thought it funny as evidenced by the general lack of laughter and the tepid applause.
I hope our President has the intestinal fortitude to be the first to inform the media "thanks, but no thanks" to the next invitation to dine with the jackals.
Declining the invite would especially send a lesson to the yutes of America that the office of president is to be treated with respect, even if some do not respect the person.
What purpose is served by what started out to be funny "roasts" of attending presidents and has evolved into blood-sucking rhetoric in front of a crowd of Draculas?
C'mon, President Bush. If anyone can break this degrading chain of unedible dinners, you can. Next year, tell the drooling DC media hyenas that you and Laura have a previous dinner engagement at Denny's next year.....or be out of the country dining with real humans, our brave troops.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.