Skip to comments.
House Intel Panel Chief Opposes Hayden
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060507/D8HF00R00.html ^
| May 7, 10:12 AM (ET)
| By NEDRA PICKLER
Posted on 05/07/2006 8:10:30 AM PDT by tomnbeverly
WASHINGTON (AP) - A leading Republican came out against the front-runner for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, saying Sunday the spy agency should not have military leadership during a turbulent time among intelligence agencies.
Members of the Senate committee that would consider President Bush's nominee also expressed reservations, saying the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters.
Bush was expected to nominate a new director as early as Monday to replace Porter Goss, who abruptly resigned on Friday.
But opposition to Hayden because of his military background is mounting on Capitol Hill, where he would face tough hearings in the Senate Intelligence Committee.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; cia; hoekstra; intel; michaelhayden; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Peter Hoekstra is wrong... This is exactly what the Agency needs.... Strong Military leadership... There has been way too much nepotism going on over there with the civilian leadership this is the correct approach let them answer to the General.
To: tomnbeverly
Do you get the idea that the members of Congress from both parties are absolute idiots?
2
posted on
05/07/2006 8:13:06 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: tomnbeverly
I was wondering about that as well. CIA is a civilian agency, not a military one.
3
posted on
05/07/2006 8:13:59 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: bnelson44
Thats why you have the crap over there that Valerie Plame and now Mary McCarthy have started...
4
posted on
05/07/2006 8:16:09 AM PDT
by
tomnbeverly
(Steer Clear Of Large Metropolitian Areas Because The Liberals Will Reap What They Sow.)
To: bnelson44
The General will retire from the military in order to take on the DCIA position.
5
posted on
05/07/2006 8:16:52 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
To: tomnbeverly
the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters. 'Civilians', such as Valerie Plame, Mary McCarthy, and Larry Johnson have been the problem.
6
posted on
05/07/2006 8:17:15 AM PDT
by
6SJ7
To: Brilliant
This is getting a lot of play on Fox this morning.
Makes you wonder how Bush gets anything done.
To: stevestras
Bush should just take whoever the House recommends, and then blame them when it doesn't work.
8
posted on
05/07/2006 8:19:52 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: stevestras
Spector is still flapping his gums over the "wiretaps." That is, of course, to increase his currency among the DIMS. Did you hear Biden gushing over him?
9
posted on
05/07/2006 8:20:07 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: tomnbeverly
I suspect a foolish budgetary turf battle.
Hayden may be considered too willing to move functions to the military: from Intelligence committee control to Defense committee control.
10
posted on
05/07/2006 8:29:54 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: tomnbeverly
Isn't there some law about switching from military to civilian executive position without a waiting period? I think it came up once before.
To: tomnbeverly
I can't think that the President (advisors) were not aware of this "problem" when they spoon fed Hayden's name to the MSM.
If that assumption is correct, the President will have (already has) someone in control who will be calling the shots, and for as long as it takes for Congress to deal with it.
In the end, I suspect either confirmation, or a John Bolton (UN) like appointment.
The bases are covered.

12
posted on
05/07/2006 8:33:16 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of outthinking our adversaries?)
To: tomnbeverly
The writing in this article sucks. "A leading Republican" are the first three words of the article. But the person isn't identified until the end of the fifth paragraph. Sucks.
BTY, tnb, no need to excerpt My Way News. Not on the list.
13
posted on
05/07/2006 8:33:53 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
To: 6SJ7
Larry Johnson is the modern equivalent of the 'embittered office seeker that shot James A. Garfield'. Prior to the 2000 election he was anti-Clinton, made fun of the Clinton administration, campaigned for G W Bush and I was told he worked on one of the transition teams. He was convinced he was going to get some sort of undersecretary ship or deputy directorship. It didn't happen so he switched sides.
He is foolish enough to think that a Hillary administration will reward him
14
posted on
05/07/2006 8:39:49 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: Brilliant
With both parties hovering at 18% approval, I think polls back up your assertion nicely!
LLS
15
posted on
05/07/2006 8:53:55 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: Brilliant
"Do you get the idea that the members of Congress from both parties are absolute idiots?"Oh yeah. Often.
16
posted on
05/07/2006 8:57:59 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: LibLieSlayer
Would it be possible this year to vote for none of the candidates for congress and have a new election minus the original candidates?
17
posted on
05/07/2006 9:05:56 AM PDT
by
ardara
To: ardara
thats just what the liberals hope you do..... they see any inroad as significant.... schemes to drive wedge issues into the GOP base are coming to fruition..
18
posted on
05/07/2006 9:16:59 AM PDT
by
tomnbeverly
(Steer Clear Of Large Metropolitian Areas Because The Liberals Will Reap What They Sow.)
To: tomnbeverly
Hopefully we'll see Hayden deliver that leadership. As I've pointed out before the CIA is broken beyond repair and needs a complete tear-down and overhaul.
It may be that Goss was dumped because he couldn't make the changes that needed making. Yes, Goss did some good, but he got caught up in the political in-fighting and lost his credibility.
I don't know much about General Hayden we'll have to wait to see if he can be the John Roberts of the CIA.
dung.
19
posted on
05/07/2006 9:20:40 AM PDT
by
Moose Dung
(Appeasement is a fools game.)
To: bnelson44
Previous director, Stansfield Turner, was an admiral.
20
posted on
05/07/2006 9:22:20 AM PDT
by
sgtyork
(Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson