Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Intel Panel Chief Opposes Hayden
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060507/D8HF00R00.html ^ | May 7, 10:12 AM (ET) | By NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 05/07/2006 8:10:30 AM PDT by tomnbeverly

WASHINGTON (AP) - A leading Republican came out against the front-runner for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, saying Sunday the spy agency should not have military leadership during a turbulent time among intelligence agencies.

Members of the Senate committee that would consider President Bush's nominee also expressed reservations, saying the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters.

Bush was expected to nominate a new director as early as Monday to replace Porter Goss, who abruptly resigned on Friday.

But opposition to Hayden because of his military background is mounting on Capitol Hill, where he would face tough hearings in the Senate Intelligence Committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; cia; hoekstra; intel; michaelhayden; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Peter Hoekstra is wrong... This is exactly what the Agency needs.... Strong Military leadership... There has been way too much nepotism going on over there with the civilian leadership this is the correct approach let them answer to the General.
1 posted on 05/07/2006 8:10:32 AM PDT by tomnbeverly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Do you get the idea that the members of Congress from both parties are absolute idiots?


2 posted on 05/07/2006 8:13:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

I was wondering about that as well. CIA is a civilian agency, not a military one.


3 posted on 05/07/2006 8:13:59 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Thats why you have the crap over there that Valerie Plame and now Mary McCarthy have started...


4 posted on 05/07/2006 8:16:09 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (Steer Clear Of Large Metropolitian Areas Because The Liberals Will Reap What They Sow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

The General will retire from the military in order to take on the DCIA position.


5 posted on 05/07/2006 8:16:52 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters.

'Civilians', such as Valerie Plame, Mary McCarthy, and Larry Johnson have been the problem.

6 posted on 05/07/2006 8:17:15 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This is getting a lot of play on Fox this morning.

Makes you wonder how Bush gets anything done.


7 posted on 05/07/2006 8:17:33 AM PDT by stevestras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stevestras

Bush should just take whoever the House recommends, and then blame them when it doesn't work.


8 posted on 05/07/2006 8:19:52 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stevestras

Spector is still flapping his gums over the "wiretaps." That is, of course, to increase his currency among the DIMS. Did you hear Biden gushing over him?


9 posted on 05/07/2006 8:20:07 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

I suspect a foolish budgetary turf battle.

Hayden may be considered too willing to move functions to the military: from Intelligence committee control to Defense committee control.


10 posted on 05/07/2006 8:29:54 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Isn't there some law about switching from military to civilian executive position without a waiting period? I think it came up once before.


11 posted on 05/07/2006 8:32:09 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
I can't think that the President (advisors) were not aware of this "problem" when they spoon fed Hayden's name to the MSM.

If that assumption is correct, the President will have (already has) someone in control who will be calling the shots, and for as long as it takes for Congress to deal with it.

In the end, I suspect either confirmation, or a John Bolton (UN) like appointment.

The bases are covered.



12 posted on 05/07/2006 8:33:16 AM PDT by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of outthinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
The writing in this article sucks. "A leading Republican" are the first three words of the article. But the person isn't identified until the end of the fifth paragraph. Sucks.

BTY, tnb, no need to excerpt My Way News. Not on the list.

13 posted on 05/07/2006 8:33:53 AM PDT by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7
Larry Johnson is the modern equivalent of the 'embittered office seeker that shot James A. Garfield'. Prior to the 2000 election he was anti-Clinton, made fun of the Clinton administration, campaigned for G W Bush and I was told he worked on one of the transition teams. He was convinced he was going to get some sort of undersecretary ship or deputy directorship. It didn't happen so he switched sides.
He is foolish enough to think that a Hillary administration will reward him
14 posted on 05/07/2006 8:39:49 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

With both parties hovering at 18% approval, I think polls back up your assertion nicely!

LLS


15 posted on 05/07/2006 8:53:55 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"Do you get the idea that the members of Congress from both parties are absolute idiots?"

Oh yeah. Often.

16 posted on 05/07/2006 8:57:59 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Would it be possible this year to vote for none of the candidates for congress and have a new election minus the original candidates?


17 posted on 05/07/2006 9:05:56 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ardara

thats just what the liberals hope you do..... they see any inroad as significant.... schemes to drive wedge issues into the GOP base are coming to fruition..


18 posted on 05/07/2006 9:16:59 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (Steer Clear Of Large Metropolitian Areas Because The Liberals Will Reap What They Sow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly

Hopefully we'll see Hayden deliver that leadership. As I've pointed out before the CIA is broken beyond repair and needs a complete tear-down and overhaul.

It may be that Goss was dumped because he couldn't make the changes that needed making. Yes, Goss did some good, but he got caught up in the political in-fighting and lost his credibility.

I don't know much about General Hayden we'll have to wait to see if he can be the John Roberts of the CIA.

dung.


19 posted on 05/07/2006 9:20:40 AM PDT by Moose Dung (Appeasement is a fools game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Previous director, Stansfield Turner, was an admiral.


20 posted on 05/07/2006 9:22:20 AM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson