Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
Your list always gives me an excuse to post this one:

http://alanchapman.org/libertyvault/gwb.html

GWB's CONTRIBUTION TO BIG GOVERNMENT
HUNDREDS OF WAYS IN WHICH GEORGE W. BUSH HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT
THIS LIST LAST UPDATED JANUARY 30, 2004

LV Editor's Note: I'm aware that many links on this page no longer work. The websites to which I link sometimes remove articles or go off-line. This list contains over 200 links and it's very time consuming to verify working links on a regular basis. I also have many more items to add. If a link doesn't work and you're curious about the item then I suggest searching for similar stories using your favorite search engine.

In his nomination acceptance speech in 2000 Bush said, "Big government is not the answer." It reminded me of when Ronald Reagan said that government is not the solution and then presided over a 67% increase in federal spending during his 8-year tenure. Republicans campaign like libertarians but govern like socialists. They increase government spending, drown business in new regulations, create and expand government programs, impose economic sanctions on other countries and meddle in their internal affairs, instigate wars, and curtail freedom. They're willing to pander to virtually any special interest group which throws money in their direction. They even enact gun-control. Republicans have no incentive to reduce government because they can always count on their rank-and-file supporters to vote party-line. If you want to reduce government and get it out of your life then you must stop supporting the people who are making government bigger. Supporting the "lesser of two evils" isn't going to reduce government.Since taking office George W. Bush has increased the national debt by $895.7 billion. [source]
George W. Bush has spent more time campaigning while in office than any of his predecessors. [source]
Bush has never vetoed a spending bill. [source]
With GOP Congress behind him, Bush has yet to use veto [source]
— Aided by a Republican-controlled Congress, President Bush is on track to become the first chief executive since John Quincy Adams in the 1820s to complete a full term without vetoing one bill.

Do Republicans really support smaller government? Here are some interesting facts:

SOCIALIST WELFARE PROGRAMS & POLITICAL BOONDOGGLES


239 posted on 05/08/2006 8:21:14 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Gawain
"Your list always gives me an excuse to post this one:"

Why? Unemployment is down to 4.7%, essentially full employment save for those transitioning between jobs. Interest rates and inflation rates are historically low still. Our income taxes have been lowered, as have our taxes on dividends as well as our estate taxes.

Saddam Hussein is in jail. North Korea has agreed to disarm and abandon its nukes. Libya has surrendered its entire WMD program. Syria has withdrawn from Lebanon. Russia has withdrawn from Georgia. Taylor has abdicated from Liberia. The Taliban now cowers in caves rather than executing little girls for going to school.

Our national missile defenses have been deployed, and nuclear monitors are now in place all along our entire land and sea borders (so much so that Free Republic has its own "stunned my beeber" joke for a FReeper being detected by this equipment after his radiation therapy treatment).

The Kyoto Global Warming nonsense is history, as is our involvement in the International Criminal Court.

Partial Birth Abortion has been banned, and 2 new conservatives sit today on the Supreme Court.

Our stock market is booming. Home ownership and stock ownership are at historic highs.

Yet you are pessimistic. You see only gloom and doom. You can readily find fault with all of the above, plus rail against spending.

In short, you are personally, emotionally invested in fear and failure. You are going to lash out at anything that even remotely resembles good news.

That's how you are wired.

But that's not rational debate. That's an emotional need...sort of like the "survivalists" in the 1980's who hoped for global nuclear war to justify their retreat from society, ditto again for the Y2K crowd that cowered in their bunkers on 1/1/2000.

You want to find fault...you **need** to find gloom and doom. If you see *any* good news, you are going to rain on that parade.

In short, you want others to be as miserable and depressed as yourself.

No thanks.

245 posted on 05/08/2006 1:36:31 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson