Posted on 05/07/2006 5:17:38 AM PDT by johnny7
There is growing evidence that Republicans will face a voter turnout problem in the November midterm elections.
The GOP faces not only enormous misgivings among voters about the war in Iraq -- which amounts to 70 or 80 percent of President Bush's problems -- but also a combination of Social Security, mounting budget deficits, Hurricane Katrina, Harriet Miers, port security, immigration, gasoline prices and various scandals. History tells us that when one party is either complacent or disillusioned -- and the other party is highly motivated, agitated or angry -- the results can be devastating to the former while providing boundless opportunities for the latter.
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
Exactly! And I've been trying to make the very same point! There are a few repubs I would like to give a good shaking to .. but that doesn't mean I'm stupid enough to stay home or stupid enough to vote dem .. I have no regard for anyone who sits out an election.
And .. the ones who do sit it out .. are the ones who complain the loudest!
Presidency of George W. Bush -- the first 48 months
|
President Bush signing a federal ban on Partial Birth Abortion
|
U.S. Forces In Baghdad
Broke the Chinese Yuan to Dollar currency peg
CAFTA - President Bush signing CAFTA
Bolton to the UN
Has CONSTRUCTION in process on the second group of eight ABM silos in Alaska and California so that America has a land-based defense (in addition to our sea-based SM-3 and AEGIS systems) of 18 ABM's against North Korean nukes (note: China itself currently only has 24 -out of several hundred- nuclear ICBM's capable of reaching the U.S.)
Energy Bill (new tax cuts...after 5 years of opposition)
Immunity For Gun Manufacturers From Crime-Related Lawsuits
5% unemployment
3.4% annual (after inflation, 5.5% actual) reported GDP Growth
Syrian Troops forced to withdraw from Lebanon
Russians Troops Peacefully Withdraw From Georgia
Brought North Korea to the Negotiating Table and won their agreement to dismantle their Nuclear Weapons Program
Chief Justice John Roberts
Justice Sam Alito
Dramatically improved U.S.-India relations via a breakthrough nuclear agreement
Signed Bankruptcy Reform Into Law
Waived Make-Work Enviro Studies For New Oil Drilling
Full Immunity From Frivolous Lawsuits For Our Domestic Gun Industry
Click Here
Fed Chairman Bernanke
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1518385/posts
Iraqi's Thank America (Wow, this is moving!)
US forges trail-blazing UN condemnation of Hizbullah
US rules out extra pledges on global warming
Bush-appointed Judges: Most Conservative On Record, New UH Study Finds
Using Closed Bases For New Refineries, Cutting Refinery Red Tape
Ping
I appreciate your comment. For myself, the portions of the GOP agenda I cannot support too closely approximate Democratic pseudo-alternatives. So you could say that I oppose the GOP when it starts enacting the opposition party's platform.
I am not sure from your comment that this would be your position in the matter.
Shhhhhhhh! Let them think we'll stay home and they won't be working overtime to rig elections....their complacency is our friend.
My comment wasa pretty straightforward. I think there should be an opposition. I think that opposition should espouse alternative ideas and different points of view.
I don't need to disagree with the opposition to respect it.
The problem is that the leadership and ideas of the current opposition would destroy the nation.
That needn't be the case and it is not true of all of the them though.
Thus, I complimented you on not calling for their elimination, but rather drastic reformation. Which is my position.
"I just think of Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House & that gets my adrenalin pumping to go out and vote in November!
"
==
That's the spirit!
Hard to be motivated when those you vote for act like the opposition.
Quit spending my money.
Yeah, I like Mrs. Clinton saying that.
Sort of like a gestappo.
I didn't say the dems would be or do better, I just want the republicans I voted for to act like republicans, not some frat boy who just found a working credit card.
You're 100% right. It ISN'T Iraq or the WOT. It's the illegal immigration issue that's the straw that broke the camel's back.
"CBS News Poll. April 28-30, 2006"
Consider the source and sample.
No way would we stay home and possibly give the dems a win they should not have.
Thanks for posting this summary of what GW has accomplished.
The so called journalist who wrote this article let one of his wet dreams become pseudo news. Charlie should stick to what he knows best and writes most often on: Pushing the Gay Agenda.
http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?fr=ybr_sbc&p=Charlie%20Cook%20+%20gay
"The results in Ohio, where Democrat pollsters brought back comparatively bad news. Despite record spending for primaries, Democrats barely improved on primary numbers they had in the state back in 2002 for mid-term elections. Nationally, while approval numbers for Republicans edge down into the "teens," Republican turnout has been surprisingly good, and it now appears that several seats targeted by Democrats in Ohio, California, Texas and Florida will not be in their column in November."
This is an excerpt from an article in the newest American Spectator, and it addresses exactly what I was saying about Repub turnout. This is why I think Charlie Cook, the national dems and the MSM are getting a little ahead of themselves. Dem support nationwide is soft, and they have no coherent policy to rally around (the 1994 Contract With America) except to say that "Bush lied," and that ain't gonna carry water come November.
Ha! The rats have so many problems and more potentially deadly infighting than we do.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1628579/posts
Al Gore Might Yet Join 2008 Contenders
Wall Street Journal ^ | 5/8/06
Posted on 05/08/2006 8:02:22 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
...(Gore's denials) aren't persuasive to some Democrats, including former Clinton-Gore White House insiders. "I do know that he's thinking about it. I know for a fact," a former adviser says. "He's talked to people about the pros and cons."
Among those said to be pushing Mr. Gore are billionaire venture capitalist and high-tech entrepreneur John Doerr and Laurie David, a global-warming activist and producer of the film, and wife of "Seinfeld" and "Curb Your Enthusiasm" creator Larry David.
/snip
But, she adds, he changes the subject whenever it comes up, and had to be talked into making the movie when she pitched it.
/snip
"His star will never be higher than it is right now with his movie coming out," says Democratic consultant Karen Skelton, Mr. Gore's former political director.
The Gore buzz reflects a sense among even some pro-Clinton Democrats that Mrs. Clinton...can't win the general election because she is a polarizing figure to many voters. These skeptics believe only someone such as Mr. Gore with the celebrity and fund-raising potential to match Mrs. Clinton could stop her.
Like Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Gore remains a negative figure to many voters, says a Democrat who has seen private polls. For both, that might only increase with the spectacle of a Clinton-Gore brawl. Even insiders can't fully account for the bad blood that has built up since... Several insiders say Mr. Gore is more likely to run if Mrs. Clinton does than if she doesn't.
Also controversial among Democrats was Mr. Gore's 2004 endorsement of Howard Dean...
http://alanchapman.org/libertyvault/gwb.html
GWB's CONTRIBUTION TO BIG GOVERNMENT
HUNDREDS OF WAYS IN WHICH GEORGE W. BUSH HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT
THIS LIST LAST UPDATED JANUARY 30, 2004
LV Editor's Note: I'm aware that many links on this page no longer work. The websites to which I link sometimes remove articles or go off-line. This list contains over 200 links and it's very time consuming to verify working links on a regular basis. I also have many more items to add. If a link doesn't work and you're curious about the item then I suggest searching for similar stories using your favorite search engine.
In his nomination acceptance speech in 2000 Bush said, "Big government is not the answer." It reminded me of when Ronald Reagan said that government is not the solution and then presided over a 67% increase in federal spending during his 8-year tenure. Republicans campaign like libertarians but govern like socialists. They increase government spending, drown business in new regulations, create and expand government programs, impose economic sanctions on other countries and meddle in their internal affairs, instigate wars, and curtail freedom. They're willing to pander to virtually any special interest group which throws money in their direction. They even enact gun-control. Republicans have no incentive to reduce government because they can always count on their rank-and-file supporters to vote party-line. If you want to reduce government and get it out of your life then you must stop supporting the people who are making government bigger. Supporting the "lesser of two evils" isn't going to reduce government.Since taking office George W. Bush has increased the national debt by $895.7 billion. [source]
George W. Bush has spent more time campaigning while in office than any of his predecessors. [source]
Bush has never vetoed a spending bill. [source]
With GOP Congress behind him, Bush has yet to use veto [source] — Aided by a Republican-controlled Congress, President Bush is on track to become the first chief executive since John Quincy Adams in the 1820s to complete a full term without vetoing one bill.
Do Republicans really support smaller government? Here are some interesting facts:
SOCIALIST WELFARE PROGRAMS & POLITICAL BOONDOGGLES
FOREIGN-AID & FOREIGN INTERVENTIONISM
SUBJUGATION OF FREEDOM, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, & POWER GRABS
The kind that never seeks to actually be accountable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.