Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would a conservative Republican Party look like?
Townhall.com ^ | 5/5/2006 | Mark M. Alexander

Posted on 05/06/2006 4:15:33 AM PDT by Born Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: LibLieSlayer

SCOTUS is of course very important. But it alone is not enough to get me to vote for another rino.


21 posted on 05/06/2006 4:43:23 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry
I hardly think their strong stand against the WOT--THE #1 issue for me--is just about disagreement; it makes their party a non-starter for me and for many on the right.

Considering McCain is more of a conservative than the alternative, I'd vote for him against ANY Democrat. Sure he's off the plantation on a number of things, but WOT, abortion and a few other key issues, he's a lot saner than any DUmmie.

Or ANY Third Party candidate.

Third parties simply take too long to get together enough political power in our current times for a new one to arise with the support on the state and congressional level to mean anything. I'm 40 years old, I can't afford to wait till I'm dead for a new "conservative" party to arise and have the country flushed down the tubes by the democrats.

22 posted on 05/06/2006 4:44:42 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (If you flame me I'll ignore you. Assume that to mean I think you're an idiot not worth my time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The Republican party is in disarray, but I can't understand those who just want to toss the whole thing and suffer through years of DUmmie victories to Teach A Lesson.

It's like this: no matter what you tell the Republican party, as soon as you say "but I'll support you in the election" you've told them to 'disregard all before'. Think of vote refusal as practicing 'tough love', or as 'shaping the platform in 2008'.

The Republic can survive Democrats in power for a while, it has before.

23 posted on 05/06/2006 4:49:03 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Not liberals, moderates. Moderates are those who think for themselves, rather than have to be told how to think.


24 posted on 05/06/2006 4:49:36 AM PDT by tkathy (The "can do" party can fix anything. The "do-nothing" party always makes things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I'd vote for him against ANY Democrat.

Me too, but it sure would be unpleasant. I truly hope it doesn't come to that.

25 posted on 05/06/2006 4:51:13 AM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

Whatever you wish to call them I will not support them one bit.


26 posted on 05/06/2006 4:52:56 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Even if we were to break with the Republican party, we'd still need to allie ourselves with them to win elections. That's the hard facts in this situation. The trick is to keep an open debate on conservative concerns and educate the great unwashed.

Thus the birth of FreeRepublic. We may be disgusted with invertebrate Republicans, but we can't let them continue to fall either. We need to reach out and lead them.

As far as the rats, hang 'em.

27 posted on 05/06/2006 4:57:44 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
What would a conservative Republican Party look like?

Based on the comments on this thread, I'd have to say conservatism is not a big issue for a large number of Freepers.

28 posted on 05/06/2006 5:00:55 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry
I've voted Republican like a mindless robot for the past 40 years.
In my opinion the GOP has departed from the "faith".
I will work to get the Constitution Party on the ballot.
And if and when we find ourselves under the high heels of a democrat administration,
I will rail vehemently and continually against the mindless robots,
who should have joined us.
29 posted on 05/06/2006 5:02:32 AM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Barbara Streisand!
30 posted on 05/06/2006 5:03:55 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Well said.

A simple change like getting rid of earmarks could do wonders for the party.


31 posted on 05/06/2006 5:03:57 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Moderates are those who think for themselves, rather than have to be told how to think.

Um...no. Moderates have no beliefs. Thats why they can't come down on one side or the other.

32 posted on 05/06/2006 5:06:59 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
toga!
33 posted on 05/06/2006 5:17:11 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep Lubbock Flat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Considering McCain is more of a conservative than the alternative, I'd vote for him against ANY Democrat.

Nothing, absolutely nothing on Earth would ever get me to vote for that evil, vile despicable man. If McCain was President, in four years our Republic would be so screwed that Republicans at all levels would be voted out of office. Those who cherish Liberty should go on record as stating that they would never vote for McCain. The powers that be should realize many of us will NOT hold our nose and vote for this disgusting person, because of who runs against him. I will gladly sit out this election. Our party can survive Hillary, it cannot survive a McCain Presidency. He in a very unstable, bitter and vile man. It would be quite dangerous to have him in charge (I know the same can be said of Hillary, but I think she will be defeated)

34 posted on 05/06/2006 5:31:20 AM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry

Absolutely, especially this:

http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=277


35 posted on 05/06/2006 5:33:09 AM PDT by stopem (To allow a bunch of third world country nationals to divide Americans is unconscionable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Nice hypothetical.

Since it will never happen, why bother?

One party systems (which is what we have by the defacto abandonment of "The Game" by the bankrupt Demoscats.) almost always becomes a haven for all persuasions, being the only game in town.

{Are you "getting any of this"? }

One-note Whackos have a hard time dealing with the realities of life in general,much less the confusion that attends to an egalitarian reality... control freaks are by nature "unfun folks" to be around.


36 posted on 05/06/2006 5:34:56 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Moderates have no beliefs.

Us despised moderates have a lot of thought systems rather than belief systems.


37 posted on 05/06/2006 5:38:41 AM PDT by tkathy (The "can do" party can fix anything. The "do-nothing" party always makes things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
"There is PLENTY of time to change this situation, and whining and "tossing them out" so the Dems get in isn't the way. The way is by pressuring our elected officials and pushing for conservatives to win primaries. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>...................
the calm reassuring Darkwolf, so full of mature political insight..while the basic facts are all against what you peddle (fear mongering about Demorat takeovers)..
The current group of GOP senate and house members have no perpetual right to their jobs..The GOP as a party has no ordained right to continue as a national party..Just as many in Gov hold the idea that the country must bend to their wishes rather than the congress reflecting the American public We have a group of Koolaid drinkers.
These purported elder GOP groupies see only danger in the removal of even the most leftist of the current GOP crop.
as a major disaster..
For you Darkwolf and all the Koolaid drinking Bushbots..our constitution does not mandate there be a GOP party and perhaps the GOP's time in power should be over
I am Confident in the Future of America, because America is the citizens not it's political parties..flush the GOP down the toilet if they do not support the goals that they give lip service to..This Nation will overcome such a loss, of that I have no doubt.
38 posted on 05/06/2006 5:40:11 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
The one advantage the Democrats have over Republicans is greater unity of purpose. Most of them are far-left on most issues.

Unfortunately, we have what I call "cafeteria conservatives" in the GOP. These people are conservatives when it benefits them to be conservatives. For example, they are fiscal conservatives because it benefits them financially, but not social conservatives. There are Republicans opposed to illegal immigration, again because they benefit financially.

Then we have "compassionate conservatives" (and I'm not just talking about Bush) that often desire to appease their enemies more than their base.

There's no easy solution.
39 posted on 05/06/2006 5:43:36 AM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Third Parties are a waste of time in the National arena. They are more useful in affecting local politics, where third party candidates in sufficient numbers will force the two bigger parties to examine and adopt parts of the third party platform in order to co-opt the voter base for the third party.

We've seen how national third parties affect elections. In the 1990s, we lost to Clinton twice because of Ross Perot. In 2000, we won narrowly by virtue of Ralph Nader. In 2004, Ralph Nader wasn't even on the radar.

My amateur analysis is that we should be very careful at the national level when dealing with third parties. If you vote for a third party on the national level, you usually get the opposite of what you wanted, and the lag time between elections ensures that any lessons you thought you were teaching to your Republican, former representative will be lost in the struggle to oust the liberal, because by then the only lesson learned is that even a RINO is better than a Liberal.

This isn't directed at you DW. I just thought I'd ride your post and tack on my 2 cents.

We have a problem with career politicians in elected office. Our guys look weak because they're exactly that and not ideological brethren. The Left has an advantage over us, in that they've somehow managed to get ideological liberals elected. In any battle, the side that believes in itself the most has the advantage of being willing to go to extreme lengths to achieve their goals. We've seen this with the Liberal Left with great dismay. We have yet to see large numbers of Republicans willing to put their jobs on the line in favor of advancing the conservative agenda.

If we want to teach our national leaders a lesson, we need to start by building up the smaller third parties at the local level. Electing responsible, conservative local representatives will also be the most effective way of controlling the effect of government in our lives. We live in a Federal republic. If this were France, the focus on the national level would be justified, but this is the United States, and the best way to reign in the Federal Government is to elect conservative State and local governments. However, if an opportunity arises to select conservatives in the upcoming primaries for national seats, do you best to help, but not at the cost of handing a seat over to the Democrats.

We seem to have a shortage of ethical people willing to stand up to the scrutiny and hostility of a liberal press. There is only so much vilification a good person can take before deciding the prize isn't worth it. If ever there was a RICO qualified scam taking place, it is the media's use of free speech to dishonestly destroy candidates they don't like, only to have those stories revealed as false or unprovable at a later date. Intimidation is how our enemies operate, be they Al Qaeda, or Democrats. Accurate, timely, and accessible information is the key to defeating both.

Ah well, enough is enough... Time for bed.


40 posted on 05/06/2006 5:44:21 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson