Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Baehr Calls Blasphemy, Sex Immorality Reasons to Miss Da Vinci Code(question: who funded it?)
agapepress ^ | May 4 06 | agape press

Posted on 05/05/2006 10:06:53 PM PDT by churchillbuff

A well-known pro-family media critic advises Christians to forego seeing the movie screen adaptation of Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code, and he says they should warn others to avoid the film as well.

Dr. Ted Baehr is chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission (CFTC) and publisher of Movieguide, a biweekly journal that reviews and rates films according to their values and family-friendly -- or unfriendly -- content. And when it comes to the kind of content viewers will find if they decide to go see the upcoming theatrical release, The Da Vinci Code (rated PG-13), the Christian movie reviewer says, "There's a lot of good reasons for people not to."

On May 17, two days before the movie's general release, a group of Christian leaders are going to hold a press conference in Washington, DC, to address the issues surrounding the controversial film. Baehr, who will be part of that group, says there is a lot more to The Da Vinci Code's plot than just the assertion that Jesus married Mary Magdalene. That is minor, the critic says, compared to some of the other blasphemous ideas presented in the story.

In the novel and its film adaptation, a Harvard symbologist named Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) teams up with a brilliant French cryptologist, Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou), to follow clues revealing that the recently murdered curator of the Louvre was involved in an ancient secret society called the Priory of Sion, over which an evil Grand Master presides.

Following clues from the murder scene, Robert and Sophie are caught up in a dangerous mystery as they match wits with an unknown enemy somehow connected with Opus Dei, a clandestine Catholic organization. Opus Dei, according to Brown's story, is believed to have long plotted to seize the Priory's carefully guarded secret -- the secret the "code" supposedly obscures, that Christ was not crucified but instead survived, married, and sired progeny.

Besides the story's more obvious blasphemies, Baehr notes, are other issues that he feels make the movie unfit for Christian audiences. "One of the problems," he explains, "is that The Da Vinci Code's main point is leading up to Sophie discovering that the Grand Master's invitation into eternal life is a sexual ceremony where he's surrounded in the basement with his cohorts in the cult of the Priory, having sex with the temple prostitute."

The CFTC chairman says he has heard some prominent Christians tell other believers to go see The Da Vinci Code because they can use the storyline of the film as a springboard to tell people the truth about Christ. But God's Word tells believers to look upon the good, the true, and the lovely, the Christian film reviewer points out. They are not told to look upon the evil, sexual ceremonies that are contained in the upcoming Tom Hanks movie, he insists.

"In Ezekiel, God tells us to be a 'watchman on the wall,'" Baehr continues, "and he says if you know that somebody is going to make a mistake, you tell them not to." Christians should avoid the movie based on Brown's novel, he contends, "because the book is just chock full of occultism, Rosicrucianism, Masonic Satanism, et cetera -- I mean, we have a lot of material on all the satanic material, all the sexual material, all the pornographic material."

The Movieguide publisher says a conscientious, thinking Christian "would be hard pressed to argue that people should indulge in this, because it's going to be engraved on people's minds." He urges believers to ignore anyone advising them to "invite the devil through dialog."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: blasphemy; davincicode; moralabsolutes; movieguide; moviereview; tedbaehr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: sinkspur
You could use a good shower, Sinkspur, because your name-calling rhetoric smells of the gutter. You claim to be a Catholic, but you enjoy sneering at other Catholics and Christians who, unlike you, have the backbone to stand up for their faith.

Obviously I'm no Saddam appeaser. I just realize we didn't need to invade Iraq. I also don't favor invading China. Does that make me an "appeaser" of the tyrants there (who have killed ten times as many as Saddam? Obviously not, but you're too logic deprived (or clouded by hate) to understand that.

21 posted on 05/05/2006 10:40:38 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

LOL!!! Well, since most of your threads are bait, as this one is, there comes a time to say "adios."


22 posted on 05/05/2006 10:44:01 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

If you're saying "adios" from this thread, I'm sure I'm not the only one who will be happy. Since you claim you don't go to movies, one wonders why you feel the need to chime in on this thread, which is about a movie. But then, apparently you'll seize any opportunity to sneer at traditional Christians.


23 posted on 05/05/2006 10:46:13 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"It's just a ..." is the slouching that takes us down the slippery slope.

Its younger brother, "If you don't like it, just turn it off," hasn't helped much either. The point has been missed by a longshot in both cases.
24 posted on 05/05/2006 10:47:06 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Are Marxist academics and apostate bishops trustworthy enough to tell you who the "real" Jesus is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider; WOSG
"It's just a ..." is the slouching that takes us down the slippery slope.

It's also used very selectively. When Mel Gibson put out the Passion, suddenly liberals weren't saying "It's Just a Movie - No Big Deal." They were basically saying it should be boycotted - if not banned.

25 posted on 05/05/2006 10:49:26 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Just what would you hope to catch with these "bait" threads, anyway? What constitutes such a thread?


26 posted on 05/05/2006 10:50:09 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Are Marxist academics and apostate bishops trustworthy enough to tell you who the "real" Jesus is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Everybody would like to ban something...


27 posted on 05/05/2006 10:50:30 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider
Just what would you hope to catch with these "bait" threads, anyway? What constitutes such a thread?"""

As with much of what that particular poster writes, I had no idea what he (or she) meant by "bait thread."

28 posted on 05/05/2006 10:51:25 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider

I got caught by the thread. I actually read the book and enjoyed it. But it's just a thriller and I did not take it seriously. Most people are smart enought to know fiction from fact, or at the Republican ones can. Foaming at the mouth and arguing against plot elements that aren't even in the book wont do anybody any good. It's plain silly.


29 posted on 05/05/2006 10:53:09 PM PDT by Mongeaux (''I would sooner be governed by the first 2,000 names in the Boston phone directory," W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The Church no longer rates movies; perhaps someone figured out that giving a movie an "X" rating guaranteed its success.

Oh really? What about this?

30 posted on 05/05/2006 10:53:37 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff; Das Outsider
As with much of what that particular poster writes, I had no idea what he (or she) meant by "bait thread."

Your mission in life is self-promotion.

You put up threads like this one, and threads trashing the Iraq war, so you can boast that you are not like the rest of us heathens out here.

31 posted on 05/05/2006 10:53:59 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
so you can boast that you are not like the rest of us heathens out here."""

Whatever

32 posted on 05/05/2006 10:55:10 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Speaking as a Christian, I would never pay to see this movie, but not because of its absurd plot line. I would just find it boring and laughable, knowing the truth, and all the things Christ has done in my life. I might watch it one day when it is on TV or DVD, just to see what all the hoopla is about. From what I can gather, its like the Omen movies, pure science fiction.


33 posted on 05/05/2006 10:58:54 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (AND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

A couple months ago it was Brokeback. Now it's the DV code. In three months it'll be something else.


34 posted on 05/05/2006 10:59:51 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
It's also used very selectively. When Mel Gibson put out the Passion, suddenly liberals weren't saying "It's Just a Movie - No Big Deal." They were basically saying it should be boycotted - if not banned.

Ah, the leadup to The Passion--I remember it fondly...

Images of middle-aged WASP academics with pancake makeup working the morning news show scene, warning us about all of the historical inaccuracies and anti-Semitism portrayed in The Passion of the Christ. The "chilling tone" (by far my favorite Liberwocky term) of Gibson's movie might lead to an anti-Jewish backlash across America, we were told. "Boycott, boycott, boycott," said some Jewish leaders.

Did their pre-release hysteria make the film a success? No. It was the churches and organizations buying out entire showings and an extended run at the box office that did.
35 posted on 05/05/2006 11:01:14 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Are Marxist academics and apostate bishops trustworthy enough to tell you who the "real" Jesus is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Unlike Blowback Mountain, DV Code was actually entertaining. Neither was worth taking seriously.


36 posted on 05/05/2006 11:02:43 PM PDT by Mongeaux (''I would sooner be governed by the first 2,000 names in the Boston phone directory," W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

True. I read it too. By the way, I abhor Christian bashing, which is a form of bigotry. They claim that Mary Magdalene was married to Jesus. Also, they claimed Jesus had children. Now, the question is, are they even around?


37 posted on 05/05/2006 11:04:38 PM PDT by Ptarmigan (Ptarmigans will rise again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
From what I can gather, its like the Omen movies, pure science fiction.

As science fiction does involve science fact mingled with much outright fiction, you've summed it up nicely! ;)

The claims, like the existence of 80 "gospels," evidence for Jesus's marriage in the Gospel of Philip, and so on, are laughable. I advise everyone to check them out.
38 posted on 05/05/2006 11:07:11 PM PDT by Das Outsider (Are Marxist academics and apostate bishops trustworthy enough to tell you who the "real" Jesus is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider

It was actually an aggressive marketing campaign by outreach inc and motive entertainment who were responsible for all those seats being sold...


39 posted on 05/05/2006 11:10:28 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
When are people like Baehr and institutions like my Catholic Church going to figure out the psychology of begging people to boycott a film?

Oh, I know. It's much better to just be silent when your religion is attacked and ridiculed in an extremely public and high-profile way.

You know what? People who think that are idiots.

This movie is going to get all the free publicity it will ever need from the Catholic-hating media--more than enough to make it a blockbuster. This is an opportunity for Christians to stand up and defend Christ. Defend their Faith. Defend 2000 years of Church history. If you want to be silent, I recommend that you take your own advice (i.e., "shut up") and leave the defense of the Church to the rest of us.
40 posted on 05/05/2006 11:10:42 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson