Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP - Source: CIA Director Goss Resigns
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/5/06 | AP

Posted on 05/05/2006 10:52:38 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - CIA Director Porter Goss has resigned, a senior administration official said.

President Bush, who has been making staff changes at the White House to reinvigoriate his second term, was making another personnel announcement Friday.

Bush's new chief of staff, Joshua Bolten, has made several changes since taking over last month.

Recently, longtime Bush adviser and confidant Karl Rove had the policy-making portion of his portfolio taken away so he could focus on the midterm elections and White House press secretary Scott McClellan announced his resignation. McClellan has been replaced by Fox News commentator Tony Snow.

McClellan's last briefing at the White House was Friday. His last day isn't until next week, but the president is traveling in Florida the first part of the week, meaning that McClellan will be briefing on the road.

Rove was allowed to keep his deputy chief of staff title, but was stripped of day-to-day oversight of policy coordination. That job was given to Joel Kaplan, Bolten's former No. 2 when he was budget director.

Bush also named Rob Portman, a former six-term Republican congressman from Ohio who now serves as U.S. trade representative, to replace Bolten at the head of the Office of Management and Budget.

The vacant job of domestic policy adviser has not yet filled.

Other changes that have been expected included changes in the White House lobbying office run by Candida Wolff and the expected departure of communications chief Nicolle Wallace, whose husband recently moved to New York. Officials have also done little to discourage speculation that Treasury Secretary John Snow is leaving.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; ciadirector; director; goss; portergoss; resignation; resigns; source; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: Muleteam1

In each case it is because the organization is full of liberals.


81 posted on 05/05/2006 3:28:46 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Correct. Give me a room with two or more liberals and I will show you a plan to burn the room down. I would go as far as to say that liberals always have a burr under their saddle about something but jack__ses don't often wear saddles.


82 posted on 05/05/2006 3:41:43 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer128

"kick *ss and take names"

When I think of the CIA, I think of some truly scary mothers.

I don't think of buraucrats and analysts.

Give us some Jason Bournes. Lots of 'em.


83 posted on 05/05/2006 3:51:58 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1
Liberal used to describe people who stood for something, people like Hubert Humphrey. Since 1968, it describes those who give individualism a bad connotation.
84 posted on 05/05/2006 4:39:35 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
There's a bit too much vindictiveness and outright hatred in liberals for me anymore. The liberals I have personally known seem to be seeking a utopia on earth and cannot fathom that others may not agree with them. Not that we don't see some of that inability to cooperate here on FR from rigid conservatives. The American liberal movement has drifted a bit too close to socialism and communism for my tastes. They hate religion, they want to redistribute wealth, they despise individualism and entrepreneurship and they seem to want government to become a huge, but dangerous, elite ruling class.
85 posted on 05/05/2006 5:03:49 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1

The difference between them and the communists is a difference of degree rather than kind.


86 posted on 05/05/2006 5:13:53 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1
"rigid conservatives"

Awlright dang it!!! Just what the heck do you think is wrong with us "ridgid" (I perfer consistent) "conservatives???"

Why you slammin us? If it weren't for us grabbin the steerin wheel everytime you "expediency conservatives" start capitulatin to some artfully crafted trap of the liberals, you'd all be in the ditch tryin to dial 911 for your big government tow truck pork program!!! Give it up with that "ridgid conservatives!"

Quit trying to stigmatize people you don't fully agree with as that's a liberal tactic, remember?

87 posted on 05/05/2006 5:22:16 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What? Are you now going for thread #20,000? (grin)


88 posted on 05/05/2006 5:24:09 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
This has "Negroponte" written all over it... He's cleaning house, kicking ass, and taking names...

But we all will have to wait and see what comes down the river... I have a bad feeling about this...

89 posted on 05/05/2006 5:32:57 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I suppose degrees are all that separate any government form.


90 posted on 05/05/2006 5:37:01 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Sorry if I offended you with my rigid conservative comment. I can be pretty rigid in my beliefs as well and I don't disagree with true conservatism. My comparison beween liberals and conservatives was not in regard to their beliefs but in regard to an inability to compromise. Experience has taught me when liberals are laying a trap for me in a supposed compromise, and age and experience have taught me that cooperation is sometimes needed to get a smile from a prune-eating liberal. Never assume that as a conservative we are too dumb to take on a liberal in a game of wits.

Muleteam1

91 posted on 05/05/2006 5:58:23 PM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider; NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach; tubebender; calcowgirl
"Negroponte"

You mean the idiot that is still calling himself "Ambassador," and expecting everyone around him to do the same? He still thinks he's in the State Department!!!

You mean the idiot that last week said Iran was at least 10 years away from having a nuclear bomb? He's the one that should have been asked to resign immediately!!!

He's the one that has been encouraging that Iranian punk President to keep rattling his sabre, thus keeping the price of oil where it's been!!!

I have been having bad feelings about Negropointyheadedidiot!!!

92 posted on 05/05/2006 10:17:41 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1; NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach; tubebender; calcowgirl; dalereed
All is well that ends well. But we both know there's sometimes a fine line between some compromises and near capitulation that just puts off the inevitable confrontation. That then only helps the one that has the most patience, which usually isn't the conservative!!!

The old practice of compromising 50%, then 50% of that, then 50% of whatever remains is totally self-destructive and NOT recommended for conservatives, it would seem... but what do I know? I'm old school and traditional.

When they tell me... "bend or break, change or die," I'm too old to bend and don't give a hoot about changing from the fabulous life I've lived in such a fabulous nation. I'm not the slightest bit interested in compromising with those who simply want change for the sake of change. This is simply a young person's trick, knowing that ANY change inurs to their benefit!

What us old guys have lost in physical prowess, strength and endurance, we more than make up for in shrewdness, cunning and shear treachery! You youngsters shouldn't "start" with us if you value your dignity as much as we value what little we have left!!! (grin)(we don't have any time to recover anything we lose, you see)

93 posted on 05/05/2006 10:33:46 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

DThe youngsters tht call themselves conservatives wouldn't make a pimple on a conservatives ass.


94 posted on 05/05/2006 11:30:22 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
>>You youngsters<<

Thank you!

95 posted on 05/06/2006 6:26:51 AM PDT by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1

Well... I grinned when I typed it! Just like our Grinninator Governor whenever he puts out another CON Job!!!


96 posted on 05/06/2006 8:50:07 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com
>>>Close the agency down... they are turning into the KGB.<<<

I just wish they were they were as good at collecting intelligence as the old KGB...but without the aaahh... harsh methods!

One of the best comments I saw elsewhere was: "the CIA used to get in trouble for attempting to overthrow foreign governments, now, (since Clinton) they are attempting to overthrow the US government"!!

Pretty much right on!

97 posted on 05/06/2006 9:08:58 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard; JeffersonRepublic.com
"the CIA used to get in trouble for attempting to overthrow foreign governments, now, (since Clinton) they are attempting to overthrow the US government"!!

Hey! That's SUPER!!!

98 posted on 05/06/2006 4:50:32 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Without consistent core conservatives in charge, the GOP is fast becoming the Gelded Old Party!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
There is no DCI ! That position was replaced by DNI. The Dir of CIA is now just that, director of a single agency CIA. The Dir/CIA no longer head the intelligence community. (Not that in practical terms he had any real authority over the IC even though he was supposed to!) The DNI heads the IC now thats what all the legislation was about. Goss probably realized it was a position shrinking in importance, maybe senator is better hence the resignation.
99 posted on 05/06/2006 5:01:31 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Thanks for straightening me out on that.


100 posted on 05/07/2006 3:49:43 PM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson