Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kenneth Starr to take on Alaska appeal over 'bong' banner
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 5/3/06 | AP

Posted on 05/03/2006 4:05:54 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Kenneth Starr, the former Whitewater special prosecutor, will represent the city school board in appealing a court ruling that favored a high school student who displayed a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner during an Olympic torch relay.

The school board wants the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. In April, an appeals court said school officials violated the student's free speech rights when they suspended him for 10 days.

Starr, who is dean at Pepperdine Law School in Malibu, Calif., has agreed to take the case for free, said Phyllis Carlson, president of the school board.

"Federal law requires us to maintain a consistent message that use of drugs like marijuana is harmful and illegal. Yet, when we try to enforce our policies, our administrators are sued and exposed to damage awards," she said.

Calls to Starr's office Wednesday by The Associated Press were not immediately returned.

Joseph Fredrick was 18 and a high school senior in 2002, when he unfurled his banner during the Winter Olympic torch relay through Juneau, hoping to grab the attention of television cameras.

School district officials said his banner violated the school's anti-drug policies and suspended him despite the fact that he was off campus at the time and did not disrupt school functions.

Frederick sued the school district but lost in federal court when a judge ruled that school officials had wider discretion to control his actions and were entitled to regulate speech that encouraged drug use.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco disagreed, saying school officials violated Fredrick's free speech rights.

Frederick's lawyer, Douglas Mertz, said it is unlikely the nation's highest court will hear the case.

Starr was independent counsel in the Whitewater hearings and his investigation into former President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky led to Clinton's impeachment.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; alaska; appeal; banner; bong; kennethstarr

1 posted on 05/03/2006 4:05:56 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

These rulings on students' so-called 1st Amendment rights are insane. What about the other parts of that Amendment? What about other rights in the Bill of Rights? Assembly, association, religion, guns... Funny how the lefties only want to disrupt schools by the so-called Free Speech method. Schools should be treated as surrogate parents, and should not be allowed to permit things their parents wouldn't. Anything is foolishness.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 4:35:14 PM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

What about the fact he wasn't on school property? If he was an employee, the govt (public school) would naturally be in it's rights to fire him. I wonder if the fact he was off campus, and of legal age, would make a legal difference...


3 posted on 05/03/2006 4:39:13 PM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I don't see how the school board even thinks this is their issue. He was off school property at a non-school event. Do they want to control a person's free speech after he graduates too?


4 posted on 05/03/2006 5:01:15 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Illegal immigration 24/7, the GOP ain't making it 24/7, Oil 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Maybe he can handle this one. He may be the most overrated lawyer in American history.


5 posted on 05/03/2006 5:25:51 PM PDT by billhilly (The Democrat symbol is no longer the donkey, it's a strait Jacket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"School district officials said his banner violated the school's anti-drug policies and suspended him despite the fact that he was off campus at the time and did not disrupt school functions."


What law did he violate? Or is the school asking the judge to make a new law?

6 posted on 05/03/2006 5:34:54 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The media might of left important points out. Such as, were they on a field trip or were they supposed to be under school function of some kind?


7 posted on 05/03/2006 5:42:55 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Since Frederick was not on campus and had every right to wave his banner, I highly doubt that the U.S. Supreme Court will deny him his right to free speech either.


8 posted on 05/04/2006 6:42:43 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson