Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Congresswoman Susan Davis Moves To Legalize Sodomy in U.S. Military

Posted on 05/03/2006 2:35:25 PM PDT by James Hartline

-The James Hartline Report- Breaking News May 3, 2006 (8:00am.pst)

Democratic Congresswoman Susan Davis Pushes For Legalization Of Sodomy In U.S. Military: Her Move Seen As Threat To National Security

(JHR) In what many are calling a grave threat to national security, Democratic Congresswoman Susan Davis has begun to push for the legalization of sodomy in the United States military. According to an April 28, 2006 press release issued by the radical homosexual group, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), Congresswoman Davis has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill to remove the ban on homosexual participation in the United States military (www.sldn.org/templates/press/record.html?section=2&record=2917). Davis, a liberal pro-abortion Democrat, represents the military-based area of San Diego, in turn making her decision to lead the charge to remove restrictions on sodomy in the military, a move that could jeopardize, not only moral discipline in the armed forces, but would lead to the immediate flight of thousands of military servicemen who do not want to be exposed to homosexual activity inside of their barracks.

Congresswoman Davis' intense support for homosexuality and lesbianism, and her disconnect from what that means inside of the military, reveals a gaping lapse in judgment for this former San Diego city school board member. Never was this disconnect more glaring than Davis' sponsoring of this bill while the military is currently conducting a prosecution of seven members of the Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division for appearing on a gay porn website (http://365gay.com/Newscon06/05/050206porn.htm).

Gay activists have been upset with Congresswoman Davis for not previously signing on to repeal the ban on homosexuals in the military. Up for reelection in the Congressional 53rd District, Davis now reversed course to appease radical gay activists. Deeming it more important to appease homosexual activists than the consequences to national security by allowing the spread of homosexuality inside of the military, Congresswoman Davis now personifies a politician who is out of touch with the current world war that America is fighting to defeat terrorism. Why someone would want to introduce something as unhealthy as sodomy into the military, that would clearly demoralize many American troops in the midst of a deadly war, has dumbfounded voters in her district.

Congresswoman Davis has, as her District Director, Todd Gloria, a radical gay activist (www.thecentersd.org/boardofdirectors.asp). Gloria, who serves on the board of the San Diego Gay and Lesbian Center, has been aggressively supporting the legalization of gay marriage and other anti-family causes. In 2003, Congresswoman Davis was a featured speaker at a porn-promoting Conference on Bi-Sexuality, where workshops on perverted sexual acts were also presented (www.cwfa.org/articles/4462/CFI/cfreport/index.htm). The idea that Congresswoman Davis has surrounded herself with such immoral policymakers and events is disturbing to many of the constituents in her district. Now that she has extended her radical views on sexuality into a campaign to legitimize such behavior in the Armed Services, can only be interpreted as a threat to national security. With documented cases of sexual promiscuity and AIDS inside of homosexual communities throughout America rapidly increasing, it is disturbing to many Americans, why liberal Democrats and some Republicans want introduce such a threat into the military.

According to Congresswoman Davis' congressional website (www.house.gov/susandavis/about.html), she lists in her biography that she graduated with a degree in sociology from the University of California-Berkeley, and acquired a master's degree in social work from the University of North Carolina. This may explain why Davis cannot grasp a realistic picture of why keeping sodomy out of the military is a high priority for military leaders who want to instill sound moral judgment into young eighteen and nineteen year old recruits.

To contact Congresswoman Davis with comments on her push to legalize sodomy in the military go to www.house.gov/susandavis/IMA/contact.html.

This information has been provided by the James Hartline Report. Now Read By Over 6,000 Concerned Citizens Everyday!

Changing The Culture, One Voter At A Time! I Am Making My Stand! Are You?

JHRonline www.jameshartline.com

James Hartline, Publisher The James Hartline Report Educating The Church Fighting For Our Generation


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 109th; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; pimpmyblog; sodomy; susandavis; unfittoserve; upthepoopchute
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: James Hartline
We Americans just can't SIT around & allow these vermin to continue to destroy all good aspects of a society. We can't just complain. We have to take an active force on these cretins. I don't mean harmful acts but she needs a few gnats in her face on a constant basis which interrupts her lunches etc.
41 posted on 05/03/2006 3:46:36 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
...degree in sociology...

I eschewed all sociology classes in college since it's mostly bunk.

42 posted on 05/03/2006 3:55:05 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

Why? Just because that is what she likes . . .


43 posted on 05/03/2006 3:56:50 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
She then earned a master's degree in social work

Damn that's almost equivalent to my Ph.D in Bullshitting....
44 posted on 05/03/2006 3:58:07 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline; AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FYI -more on don't ask don't tell -- those that must tell everyone want everyone that has tolerated the absurd to accept the absurd and condone the disordered.

Don't ask don't tell is a leftist toleration policy where no toleration is merited. Time to kick the don't ask don't tell policy to the curb...

For those not aware -- it is quite difficult to find objective let alone conservatively biased "homosexual" news articles. According to the MSM there is no "homosexual" agenda and [they] try very hard to make it seem that way with all the "gay" headlines that always attempt to confuse a chosen activity with the status of innate being and conflate the overwhelming rejection of homosexual activity by society with the conspiratorial trampling of human and or unalienable rights by bigoted homophobes...

45 posted on 05/03/2006 4:00:40 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

The statement that there are 21,000 gay and lesbian veterans is a statement that has no proof of fact. That is a falsified number that cannont be proven, stated by the homosexual website seeking to legalize sodomy by overstating their numbers and importance. Really, it is time to DEFY THE LIE!


46 posted on 05/03/2006 4:02:38 PM PDT by James Hartline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
"She graduated from the University of California at Berkeley with a degree in sociology."

That's the problem right there - social constructionism on the brain. Total and complete disconnect from the real - why live in the real world when you can construct your own fantasy world?

In any case, she's a woman, why does she care about sodomy - and in the military, no less?

I'm not happy with Clinton, and I can't stand to think what would happen to our military or intelligence communities under the other Clinton!

47 posted on 05/03/2006 4:14:35 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

Can this person be unelected, please.


48 posted on 05/03/2006 4:40:12 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

Lets send this to the Rev FRED PHELPS and the WBC. maybe he will go protest at her offices and leave the vets hospitals and soldiers funerals alone for awhile.


49 posted on 05/03/2006 4:48:24 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

Draft the witch.


50 posted on 05/03/2006 4:52:10 PM PDT by Muleteam1 (USAF - 1968-1972 SSgt Crew Chief F-111E "Aardvark")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

Democratic Congresswoman Susan Davis Pushes For Legalization Of Sodomy In U.S. Military: Her Move Seen As Threat To National Security



These quite frankly may be the two DUMBEST sentences ever strung together on the internet.


51 posted on 05/03/2006 5:15:12 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline
Well, sodomy IS a UCMJ offense. Unfortunately, that applies to men with women as well as men with men. I'd like to see sodomy only defined as sexual relations between men (or women), and vigorously prosecuted. However, the particular, ahem, methodology of sexual expression between an adult consenting man and an adult consenting woman, is completely private and no business of the government.*

Scroll below to see what I mean. Warning! Adult content.
















*In other words, a bj from your wife is considered sodomy in the UCMJ, and if you're in the military you could be court martialed for receiving one.

52 posted on 05/03/2006 5:28:33 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
I agree, but frankly, I wouldn't be excited about joining a military in which I'm likely to be keep awake at night in the barracks or on the front lines by the sound of two men going at it together or the possibility of having to cope with "gay" "sexual" dynamics on the battlefield.

Such a ruling very well could threaten national security in the sense that no one will want to join the military 'cept gays - and what kind of a military would that be? What country would fear the might of the American fags?

Just my 2 cents...

53 posted on 05/03/2006 5:29:53 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

I think they should also get rid of the UCMJ article against lurking.


54 posted on 05/03/2006 5:30:12 PM PDT by Busywhiskers (Strength and honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

I'm speechless.


55 posted on 05/03/2006 5:30:15 PM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

I wonder if she'll try to rid the military of adultery laws too. Jeesh.


56 posted on 05/03/2006 5:33:08 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

I agree, but frankly, I wouldn't be excited about joining a military in which I'm likely to be keep awake at night in the barracks or on the front lines by the sound of two men going at it together or the possibility of having to cope with "gay" "sexual" dynamics on the battlefield


They have that now with "Don't ask, don't tell." I can't tell what this vaccuous woman is trying to do other than stir a pot. I think the sodomy rule is dumb, I mean are they going to have the sex police in military housing? Hint, it's not just gay men that do that particular act.

As far as it being a threat to Nat'l security....if someone is concerned about this being a threat to nat'l security they really ought to look at the Mexican border.


57 posted on 05/03/2006 6:30:46 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Ah yes, the women in our military... Our country is going through a strange 'sexual fixation' phase and I hope we don't completely loose our sanity as a nation because of it (though I'm not optimistic on that point).

I attempted to join prior to 9/11, but I'm not greatly disappointed that I was turned away (hearing loss) given the current state of our armed forces.

58 posted on 05/03/2006 6:39:34 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: James Hartline

HR 1059. Scary, ain't it?


59 posted on 05/03/2006 6:41:57 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

World gone mad placemark.


60 posted on 05/03/2006 7:31:13 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson