Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: US mothers deserve $134,121 in salary [mothers should pay money to themselves?????]
Reuters ^ | May 3, 2006 | Ellen Wulfhorst

Posted on 05/03/2006 10:24:35 AM PDT by grundle

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A full-time stay-at-home mother would earn $134,121 a year if paid for all her work, an amount similar to a top U.S. ad executive, a marketing director or a judge, according to a study released on Wednesday.

A mother who works outside the home would earn an extra $85,876 annually on top of her actual wages for the work she does at home, according to the study by Waltham, Massachusetts-based compensation experts Salary.com.

To reach the projected pay figures, the survey calculated the earning power of the 10 jobs respondents said most closely comprise a mother's role -- housekeeper, day-care teacher, cook, computer operator, laundry machine operator, janitor, facilities manager, van driver, chief executive and psychologist.

"You can't put a dollar value on it. It's worth a lot more," said Kristen Krauss, 35, as she hurriedly packed her four children, all aged under 8, into a minivan in New York while searching frantically for her keys. "Just look at me."

Employed mothers reported spending on average 44 hours a week at their outside job and 49.8 hours at their home job, while the stay-at-home mother worked 91.6 hours a week, it showed.

An estimated 5.6 million women in the United States are stay-at-home mothers with children under age 15, according to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau data.

NOT 'JUST A MOM'

"It's good to acknowledge the job that's being done, and that it's not that these women are settling for 'just a mom,"' said Bill Coleman, senior vice president of compensation at Salary.com. "They are actually doing an awful lot."

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, some 26 million women with children under age 18 work in the nation's paid labor force.

Both employed and stay-at-home mothers said the lowest-paying job of housekeeper was their most common role, with employed mothers working 7.2 hours a week as housekeeper and stay-at-home mothers working 22.1 hours in that role.

"Every husband I've ever spoken to said, 'I'm keeping my job. You keep yours.' It's a tough one," said Gillian Forrest, 39, a stay-at-home mother of 22-month-old Alex in New York. "I don't know if you could put a dollar amount on it but it would be nice to get something."

To compile its study, Salary.com surveyed about 400 mothers online over the last two months.

Salary.com offers a Web site (http://www.mom.salary.com) where mothers can calculate what they could be paid, based on how many children they have, where they live and other factors. The site will produce a printable document that looks like a paycheck, Coleman said.

"It's obviously not negotiable," he said.

On average, the mother who works outside the house earns a base pay of $62,798 for a 40-hour at-home work week and $23,078 in overtime; a stay-at-home mother earned a base pay of $45,697 and $88,424 in overtime, it said.

In a Salary.com study conducted last year, stay-at-home mothers earned $131,471. The potential earnings of mothers who work outside the home was not calculated in the previous study.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dontquityourdayjob; feministidiocy; goodkidsisyourpay; leftisttalkingpoints; moreliberalpap; stayathomemoms; whataload
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
This article doesn't say who would pay the salary.

I think the parents of the child should pay the salary.

1 posted on 05/03/2006 10:24:41 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

Lets just have the government pay wifes salaries.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 10:25:29 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Let's charge the children!


3 posted on 05/03/2006 10:25:36 AM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

A hit piece for welfare queens.


4 posted on 05/03/2006 10:26:15 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
A truly idiotic study.

And will be on every nightly news show tonight.

5 posted on 05/03/2006 10:26:35 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

My wife works about 10hrs a week at home, if Im lucky.....


6 posted on 05/03/2006 10:26:37 AM PDT by AmericanCowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I think the kids should pay after they are grown. That would definitely help my retirement.


7 posted on 05/03/2006 10:27:47 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I'll do it!!!


8 posted on 05/03/2006 10:27:51 AM PDT by HOTTIEBOY (AIXELSYD TAEB I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

"A full-time stay-at-home mother would earn $134,121 a year if paid for all her work ...."


Prove it. Let's see some women pull down that salary doing all those tasks for someone. If I could earn that much money for doing the work described, I would change job in a heartbeat.


9 posted on 05/03/2006 10:27:55 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Next, the IRS will be wanting to tax this "income"...


10 posted on 05/03/2006 10:28:51 AM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Now com'on, what's the purpose of this survey? A salve for the oppressed? Geez.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 10:29:43 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What if you homeschool? I'd love to get the figure on that!


12 posted on 05/03/2006 10:30:07 AM PDT by KPfromDerryNH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Lets just have the government pay wifes salaries.

We'll see that proposed in our lifetimes.

13 posted on 05/03/2006 10:30:13 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Of course we could get illegal aliens to do it for $12,000 a year and no benefits.


14 posted on 05/03/2006 10:30:23 AM PDT by Busywhiskers (Strength and honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCowboy

And how many hours of housework do you contribute each week?


15 posted on 05/03/2006 10:31:26 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle
What do the husbands get paid for lawn care, spider extermination and stud fees?

SD

16 posted on 05/03/2006 10:31:39 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Mine quit. Does that mean she pays me?


17 posted on 05/03/2006 10:31:42 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (I think - therefore I am conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If its Reuters its wrong.

HELLO FOLKS! THIS IS SOCIALITS COMMIE TALKING POINTS!

We just had a MAJOR socialist move on May 1 to make inroads to the USA.

This is third way BS. See Hitlary clinton and her third way to socialism supporters.

Divide and conquer because they must see an increase in women working at home.


18 posted on 05/03/2006 10:31:57 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Plenty of households employ both a housekeeper and a full-time nanny and I guarantee they do not pay 130K.
19 posted on 05/03/2006 10:32:18 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
To me, it implies the husband benefits, so he pays.

They didn't figure his cost if he were to have to go out and pay a prostitute for sex.

Now...figuring they only have 3 children, the cost of sex ONCE A MONTH..... comes out to....

;^)

20 posted on 05/03/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson