Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ameriquest slashes 229 offices, 3,800 jobs
Sac Bee ^ | 5/3/06 | Andrew McIntosh

Posted on 05/03/2006 9:59:27 AM PDT by BurbankKarl

ACC Capital Holdings, the parent company of Ameriquest Mortgage Co. and Town and Country Credit, said Tuesday it is closing all of its 229 retail mortgage branches and cutting 3,800 jobs across the country to cut costs.

The closures include a handful of Ameriquest and Town and Country retail branches in Sacramento, Rancho Cordova and Stockton, possibly affecting dozens of employees in the region.

Ameriquest's California regional mortgage center in Sacramento will remain open. The Orange-based firm, which handles subprime mortgage loans, would not give specific information about local branch closings or jobs cut.

ACC Holdings vice-chairman Adam Bass said in a statement the job cuts and closures were difficult but necessary to lower costs and remain competitive. The firm until Tuesday had 11,000 workers.

Spokesman Chris Orlando denied that a national real estate slowdown and a related decline in mortgage business were factors.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ameriquest; layoffs; mortgage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
I guess sponsoring the blimp, Rolling Stones, and Nascar didn't cut it!
1 posted on 05/03/2006 9:59:28 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

ping


2 posted on 05/03/2006 10:00:00 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I guess new home mortgages stopped getting gobbled us like in the past and the industry is grinding down to a slower pace.


3 posted on 05/03/2006 10:02:25 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Thanks for the *Ping* ! I hear about Ameriquest last night. Mortgage companies all over the U.S. are tightening their belts. What do lenders understand, that most people do not even have a clue about?


4 posted on 05/03/2006 10:05:58 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Well, the stuff is about to hit the fan. Everyone has borrowed, then borrowed again. Companies like Ameriquest have made questionable loans to folks who are cashing in on the "equity" in their homes.

Many of those loans were made at rates that have long since become obsolete. The ARMs are about to hit their conversion date. The interest-only loans are about to change to ARMs.

There is going to be great wailing and gnashing of teeth among those homeowners who were expecting a constant rate of growth in the value of their homes. Nobody wants to give them yet another refi.

It's gonna get ugly.


5 posted on 05/03/2006 10:09:39 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

I will not go into detail but the closing of some of these mortgage companies will be no great loss to the consumer.


6 posted on 05/03/2006 10:18:37 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Especially for people who refinanced the over valued homes in California and bought a vacation home in another state. They are going to be hit worse than people who just bought two luxury autos and paid off credit cards. Because lenders will soon demand the difference between to loan amount and the market value of the properties. Upside down really means upside down. It is going to worse than ugly.


7 posted on 05/03/2006 10:24:12 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

"Especially for people who refinanced the over valued homes in California and bought a vacation home in another state."

That's a small group. A larger group is made up of folks who refinanced more than once, to pay off bills, get nice stuff, etc. Most of them are SOL on this one. Most didn't really understand the terms of what they were doing, and Ameriquest and others were predatory in seeking those borrowers.

These are the folks who are already living from paycheck to paycheck and juggling bills to pay their mortgage. They'll soon be defaulting, and lenders don't want the houses.

Being upside down on debt is a very bad thing. It's going to cause a reverberating cycle that's not going to be good for the economy.


8 posted on 05/03/2006 10:28:01 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

Are you saying mortgage loans are callable? I thought that was illegal.


9 posted on 05/03/2006 11:07:35 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
It's gonna get ugly.

I knew they had pretty much tapped the market when I heard about mortgage companies selling illegal immigrants interest-only mortgages.

10 posted on 05/03/2006 11:11:08 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

Mine isn't, and I've never seen one that is. When signing my papers on my new home, I looked for such a provision and couldn't find it. I then asked my realtor and the escrow officer if they ever see callable mortgages, and they said they have never heard of such a thing.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 11:18:02 AM PDT by VegasCowboy ("...he wore his gun outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
Scenario #1: Man borrows $ 500,000 on a preexisting home that just three years before was valued at $ 160,000. Then the housing bubble bursts. Turns out the house is only worth $ 200,000. You really believe the mortgage company would not demand $ 300,000? The stock holders would mandate such a move. How much do you want to bet the lender would not file suit claiming appraisal fraud?

Use your imagination. If the bubble bursts (not just leaks), lenders will become very aggressive. "Demons from hell," might be more accurate.

12 posted on 05/03/2006 11:23:08 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The appraiser, who was hired by the mortgage company, may have some risk, especially if there was collusion and/or fraud.
Short of that, the mortgage company is on their own.
13 posted on 05/03/2006 11:28:09 AM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

"There is going to be great wailing and gnashing of teeth among those homeowners.."

There may also going to be great wailing and gnashing of teeth among us taxpayers. I wonder how much liability Fanny & Freddie are on the hook for?


14 posted on 05/03/2006 11:29:57 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
I will not go into detail but the closing of some of these mortgage companies will be no great loss to the consumer.

Amen to that. Ameriquest is just the beginning. Wait until option ARM's come due in the next 1-2 years. Then it will get very ugly.

15 posted on 05/03/2006 11:36:37 AM PDT by Subsonic22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
The most important axiom is "follow the money." The appraiser was not hired by the mortgage company but by the mortgage broker on behalf of the borrower. Who benefited most from the loan? The borrower. How much was the appraiser paid? $ 500? $ 1,000? Who gets the shaft? The borrower and the mortgage broker.
16 posted on 05/03/2006 11:37:14 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
I used to do 'expert witness' work in construction biz as a sideline.
The appraiser would be considered an agent of the lender.
The borrower has no control over who is selected for the appraiser.
Again, if there were fraud or collusion, they'd be in a heap-of-trouble. But the appraiser would have a stack of comps, showing from where he developed his numbers. But the borrower would be in the clear.
17 posted on 05/03/2006 11:48:49 AM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
Freddie and Fannie won't be buying loans from subprime lenders like Ameriquest. Nor will they be purchasing No Doc, No Ratio, Option ARM's, or any of the other creative financing products that have provided (in my opinion) the steroids that have inflated property values.

Where Freddie and Fannie could be on the hook, are areas where you have seen large property appreciation and borrowers in turn have converted that equity into debt via cash out refinances and 100% purchase loans. I have seen loans made to folks who now owe $50-60,000 more on their homes than what they purchased them for 3-4 years ago. These loans are approved by Fred and Fan via their computer scoring sytems and once the loans are closed sold to them. There are a lot of new cars on the highway today that owners will still be paying for years after they have found their way to the junkyard. The amount of current mortgage debt that has to be repaid is unprecedented, how these loans perform will be interesting.

18 posted on 05/03/2006 11:51:57 AM PDT by Subsonic22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If a mortgage company demands the $300,000 dollar difference between the loan and the property value, their only recourse toward the property owner is foreclosure.

The home owner will file bankruptcy, the mortgage co. will foreclose and will be lucky to get 200,000 at auction for the house...OR the mortgage company could not hassle the homeowner and continue to recieve payments and I believe in this circumstance require PMI for the $300,000 or a portion thereof.

Stockholders that force the mortgage co. to foreclose in such situations are only shooting themselves in the foot. I'm fairly certain that, though many will be screwed, the "Demons from hell" scenario you envision will not happen. Many people will be stuck with living in the house they are in practically forever, some will commit insurance fraud, and some will file bankruptcy.

19 posted on 05/03/2006 12:01:36 PM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

What you neglect to mention is that most of these appraisals are not fraudulent. I refinanced a year ago to get a lower interest rate. My home appraised for what homes were selling for in my neighborhood. This was easily verifiable, even by me. One year later I sold my home for almost exactly what it appraised for last year.

If the market drops, the lenders are out of luck if they have to foreclose. If they don't have to foreclose, then it really does not affect them since they are still earning a market rate on their investment.

You still haven't told us why a mortgage company would want to foreclose on a performing loan. To do so would be monumentally stupid.


20 posted on 05/03/2006 12:07:04 PM PDT by VegasCowboy ("...he wore his gun outside his pants, for all the honest world to feel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson