Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Gain Insight Into Invisibility Through A Complex Superlens
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-3-2006 | Roger Highfield

Posted on 05/02/2006 5:54:54 PM PDT by blam

Scientists gain insight into invisibility through a complex superlens

By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
(Filed: 03/05/2006)

The Klingons used it to make their Bird of Prey spacecraft invisible. The Romulans used cloaking too and variants of this stealth technology hid the nasty alien in the Predator films and have been mentioned in Star Wars, Doctor Who and more besides.

Scriptwriters will be pleased to discover that this science fiction idea is deemed today to be closer to science fact than we realised, according to a paper published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Prof Graeme Milton, of the University of Utah, and Nicolae-Alexandru Nicorovici, of the University of Technology, Sydney, announce that "we have found that cloaking might be realised". The "making of an object invisible through some cloaking device is commonly regarded as science fiction", said Prof Milton.

But with Dr Nicorovici he outlines how to do it with the help of materials with bizarre optical properties that were first postulated in 1968 by Victor Veselago, a physicist working at the General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow.

His work remained obscure until six years ago, when his mathematical fantasy was realised by the creation of superlenses that can make objects placed near them invisible."

When an object is bathed in light of one colour, Prof Milton and Dr Nicorovici predict that light becomes trapped near the lens and "almost exactly cancels the light incident on each molecule in the object, so it has essentially no response to the incident light. Numerically we see that the molecule is effectively invisible".

By looking through a superlens at the object "one would only see the back half of it".


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artbell; complex; gain; insight; invisibility; science; scientists; superlens; through
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 05/02/2006 5:54:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

How far do I trust an article that begins by alluding to Star Trek, Star Wars and Doctor Who? I'm not sure...


2 posted on 05/02/2006 5:57:21 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I'll tell you how to become invisible; Ask for a third plate of all you can eat shrimp.


3 posted on 05/02/2006 6:00:52 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I saw an article about this in Scientific American some years back. All theoretical but quite interesting.
4 posted on 05/02/2006 6:03:48 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Close your eyes and it's invisible as well.


5 posted on 05/02/2006 6:09:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

So don't use a super lens and you're able to see it? Don't tell me this is a "Duh" thing.


6 posted on 05/02/2006 6:11:48 PM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuc1

Pictures of the invisible object:




1.









2.











3.


7 posted on 05/02/2006 6:11:48 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Ping


8 posted on 05/02/2006 6:26:16 PM PDT by annie laurie (All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

9 posted on 05/02/2006 6:35:35 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
placemarker
10 posted on 05/02/2006 6:39:19 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well, he was scheduled to give a seminar on the subject at Stanford on April 21: Cloaking: science fiction or reality?

I'm presuming we will see more about it when the full paper gets on the Internet

11 posted on 05/02/2006 6:40:36 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for posting this. I still have an interest in optics, although I haven't been working in the field for a couple decades. We have barely begun to understand optics, that much seems obvious.


12 posted on 05/02/2006 6:43:49 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What a waste. I could've saved him an inordinate amount of time by selling him my car. Once it's on the road it apparently becomes invisible to all other drivers.


13 posted on 05/02/2006 6:50:36 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Way cool dude, way cool.;)


14 posted on 05/02/2006 6:55:31 PM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
Numerically we see that the molecule is effectively invisible

In other words - In real life, a large collection of said molecules are just as visible as always.

15 posted on 05/02/2006 7:34:10 PM PDT by Stormcrow ("It's not that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Wow, how'd you do that?


16 posted on 05/02/2006 7:38:53 PM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
How far do I trust an article that begins by alluding to Star Trek

Yeah, it's not like we have computers and cell phones like the original series suggested back in the sixties.
17 posted on 05/02/2006 8:03:00 PM PDT by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Clinton used to make his pants disappear.


18 posted on 05/02/2006 8:08:57 PM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
From the link SauronOfMordor provided:

Abstract:

The making of an object invisible through some cloaking device is commonly regarded as science fiction. But we have found that cloaking might be realized. Specifically, regions of anomalous localized resonance, such as occur near superlenses, are shown to lead to cloaking effects. This occurs when the resonant field generated by a polarizable line or point dipole acts back on the polarizable line or point dipole and effectively cancels the field acting on it from outside sources, so it has essentially no response to the external field. Numerically and analytically we see that the polarizable line or point dipole is effectively invisible to the external time harmonic field. Cloaking is proved in the quasistatic limit for finite collections of polarizable line dipoles that all lie within a specific distance from a coated cylinder having a shell dielectric constant close to -1 and a matrix and core dielectric constant close to 1. Cloaking is also shown to extend to the Veselago superlens outside the quasistatic regime: a polarizable line dipole located less than a distance d/2 from the lens, where d is lens thickness, will be cloaked due to the presence of a resonant field in front of the lens. Also a polarizable point dipole near a slab lens will be cloaked in the quasistatic limit. The hope of using cloaking to see the interior of an object by making half of it invisible remains an intriguing possibility. This is joint work with Nicolae Nicorovici.

OK, so everybody, please join me in nodding your heads like we actually understood that. Adding a pensive sounding "hmmmmm"; five bonus points.

19 posted on 05/02/2006 8:12:50 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam

"De Selby, noting that light takes a portion of time, however small, to reach its target, came upon the idea that if a network of mirrors were aligned properly a viewer could actually see into the past through a series of repeated reflections:

What he states to have seen through his glass is astonishing. He claims to have noticed a growing youthfulness in the reflections of his face according as they receded, the most distant of them -- being the face of a beardless boy of twelve, and, to use his own words, ‘a countenance of singular beauty and nobility’.”


20 posted on 05/02/2006 8:31:49 PM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson