Posted on 05/02/2006 9:43:19 AM PDT by Alouette
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran threatened on Tuesday to attack Israel in response to any "evil" act by the United States and said it had enriched uranium to a level close to the maximum compatible with civilian use in power stations.
The defiant statements were issued shortly before world powers meet in Paris to discuss the next steps after Tehran rejected a U.N. call to halt uranium enrichment.
Senior officials from the U.N. Security Council's permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany were to discuss how to curb an Iranian program that Western nations say conceals a drive for atomic warheads.
Iran denies the charge and refuses to back down from what it calls its right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.
Driving home that message, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, said his country had now succeeded in purifying uranium to 4.8 percent, at the top end of the 3 to 5 percent range for fuel used in nuclear power plants.
"Enrichment above 5 percent is not on Iran's agenda," Aghazadeh told the students' ISNA news agency.
Iran has previously said it had enriched to more than 4 percent, far below the 80 percent level needed for bomb-making.
It has used a test cascade of 164 centrifuges to enrich uranium so far and is building two similar cascades. It says it will start installing 3,000 centrifuges later this year -- enough to yield material for one bomb within a year.
The United States and Israel have vowed to deny Iran nuclear weapons. Washington has not excluded war if diplomacy fails, while Tehran has sworn to retaliate if attacked.
TARGETING ISRAEL
"We have announced that wherever America does something evil, the first place that we target will be Israel," ISNA quoted a senior Revolutionary Guards commander, Rear Admiral Mohammad-Ebrahim Dehqani, as saying on Tuesday.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for the Jewish state to be "wiped off the map."
Iran's deputy oil minister said there was "some possibility" of a U.S. attack on his country over its nuclear program.
"I am worried. Everybody is worried," Mohammad Hadi Nejad-Hosseinian said in New Delhi after talks on a proposed $7-billion pipeline from Iran to India via Pakistan.
Concerns that Iran's dispute with the West could lead to disruption of its oil output pushed oil prices above $74 a barrel, close to the record of $75.35 touched last month.
The United States, Britain and France are expected to introduce a resolution to the Security Council this week that would legally oblige Iran to comply with U.N. demands. The three countries favor limited sanctions if Tehran remains defiant.
Iran said Russia and China, also veto-wielding permanent council members, would not back any punitive measures.
"The thing these two countries have officially told us and expressed in diplomatic negotiations is their opposition to sanctions and military attacks," Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki told Iran's Kayhan newspaper.
China and Russia both have big energy interests in Iran, the world's fourth biggest oil exporter. Russia is also helping Iran build its first atomic power plant in the Gulf port of Bushehr.
Nicholas Burns, the U.S. under-secretary of state for political affairs, said in Paris that Tuesday's meeting would seek to keep the Security Council members and Germany united before a meeting of foreign ministers in New York on May 9.
Asked about Mottaki's comments, he said: "All I know is that China and Russia say that they don't want a nuclear-armed Iran. And China and Russia have voted with us against the government of Iran. So we intend to preserve this unity."
Burns said he expected a consensus to emerge over the next 30-40 days on the need to send a "stiff message" to Iran, adding that a range of sanctions had been discussed privately.
These included restricting exports to Iran of dual-use technology that could support its research and development or help it fabricate fissile material or a nuclear device.
Other options were travel curbs on Iranian officials and a ban on arms sales to Iran, such as a planned Russian missile deal. Oil and gas sanctions were not being discussed now.
"We hope that the U.N. Security Council, through a resolution, will send a firm and united message to Iran," French Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei said in Paris.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says it cannot confirm that Iran's goals are peaceful, but has found no proof of a military program.
A U.N. resolution would be adopted under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, making it binding in international law. A separate resolution would be required for sanctions or military action.
(Additional reporting by Alireza Ronaghi and Parinoosh Arami in Tehran, Mark Heinrich in Vienna, Jon Boyle in Paris and Himanghsu Watts in New Delhi)
Your statement seemed to be pleading for someone OTHER then Israel to take action.
I am a pilot but not a fighter pilot.
Daniel Chapter 7...........
No, you pretty much read that into it yourself.
To be fair, I intentionally did not name an actor. But mainly because I am tired of the US having to do the heavy lifting for everyone else.
Imagine that you are Israel. Two other parties are in a conflict with each other, and one of them turns to you and says, "If your buddy here does anything to tick me off, I'm going after you." It seems to me that Iran is asking for Israel to take preemtive action. Why? Because it is the fulfillment of prophecy, because Israel is the main enemy, and maybe, just maybe, because Iran thinks it would do better against them than against US. Maybe they hope to quickly obliterate Israel and that we will be to confused and demoralized to respond to their fait accompli.
Makes me wonder...
An excellent allusion!
Pretty much describes most state leaders, given half a chance.
Most importantly, they have no delivery system capable of handling a U-235 weapon.
They're big, heavy beasts. Little Boy took a whole B-29.
I suppose they could dummie up a 737 or use a frieghter, but missle are out.
For now.
Very possible.
I would hope the US and Israel could do a joint action.
A car bomb or smart bomb taking the leadership out would be worth a try for now.
>>I am a pilot but not a fighter pilot.<<
Aha, I either misremembered or got you confused with someone else. I apologize.
He doesn't think the US has the cojones to attack Iran and he thinks he can simply overpower Israel, plus he's just jacking up the price of oil for his own benefit and to the detriment of the US economy and political scene. When oil gets high, Bush gets trashed, when Bush loses, republicans lose and wimp ass dem's win...this helps Mahmoud. Very clever he is...but he doesn't realize just how much fire he's playing with.
if he is betting on President Bush not being willing to fight the he is nuts. Maybe he thinks congress wont authorize it. Heck, congress might not even shut down a filibuster over it. Excellent point about oil prices. But this Presidents has no need to run for reelection and has shown more willingness to invade than any other President.
what he wants is high oil prices so he can fund his nuclear jihad
>>what he wants is high oil prices so he can fund his nuclear jihad<<
that is the closest thing to a rational explanation I can come up with.
Gee, I guess they're leaving us with an option with no consequences.
Well, they'd have to move on to plutonium production, which is a whole 'nother level.
Be easier for the russians to just sell them one.
With all his blustering, we had better attack before he is capable of launching a nuke in rataliation. He is just dying for an excuse to do it. Why wait?? If Israel and US join forces and don't wimp out it could be done!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.