Posted on 05/01/2006 1:31:03 PM PDT by edpc
I believe he attended Texas Tech for a while.
Interesting. I felt as though I was reading an epic. Beware of Beowulf.
Well that cat is out of the bag. Wonder how long it will take the current regime to "Find" the elements in the military?
"Washington has a duty to overthrown the Mullah's and assist Iran back to the 21st century."
That's how a lot of Iranians feel, too. Can't blame them.
"If he could pull it off, it would offer a better solution than anything we could do"
That's for sure.
Not understanding that the reformers are no better because they want to preserve the regime, is, as Pahlavi said, not understood in Washington.
It's like thinking you can work with the "good" Nazis.
You're right. Think if we were freedom loving Iranians, living in America, knowing the actions of Carter's crowd resulted in enslavement of their people for the last 25 years.
With the nuclear and the oil supply threats the sooner the Mahdi mad thugs in Tehran are overthrown the better for non-jihadic Iranians, America, Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan and the entire world.
Reese AFB was a fighter training base, so the bio is correct. The price would've trained in T38s and T37s. Quite a few Iranians and lots of Saudis trained as fighter pilots at Reese, and at Webb AFB in Big Spring, back then.
He kept a low profile, but was very polite and softspoken to the point of shyness when seen in public. IIRC, he and his entourage had a very large house south of 19th between Quaker and the Loop. Word was he was a very generous (anonymous) donor to the Goodfellows Christmas campaign the year he was at Reese. He would have to be better than the whack job running Iran now.
The Hance-Bush race was the year after I graduated/moved, so I don't have any campaign memorabilia, darn it!
Now I'm homesick. Sweet dreams, y'all.
That is exactly what the Khomeni did. He sat in Paris and had press conferences and fomented unrest until his underlings did the dirty work for him. Then he "took over" Iran. Carter, the stupid POS, did nothing to assist or support the Shah, and in fact encouraged the whackjob Muslims squatting in Paris and protesting. The Shah's son at least has a grasp of constitutional monarchy, unlike the Islamonazis that are running Iran now.
Kinda like the socialist-communist-liberal-homosexual democrats plan to do here when they get into power again in D.C.
'swhat the Clintons had in mind.
Actually, I can see some value in having someone to serve as a national symbol and a restraint on the excesses of democracy. The US Presidency has generally served the former function, and the US Constitutional system used to serve the latter function, but most nations don't do quite so well when attempting to craft brand-new institutions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.