Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

May Day and the Leftist Hand of Illegal Immigration
Sierra Times ^ | 5/1/2006 | Al Benson Jr.

Posted on 05/01/2006 4:11:56 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy

As the illegal immigrants and their Leftist allies continue their campaign (invasion might be a more proper word) against North American culture they have now decided to further their agenda with an economic boycott in this country on May 1st.

I'm sure the fact that May 1st is a big holiday celebrated by international communism has not escaped them. So they have chosen that day to attempt their boycott to show their true solidarity with the international political Left.

Illegals and their supporters have rallied their comrades to show us their economic muscle. They are going to show us how much we need them by trying to shut down the country on May 1st. Some might consider that a form of blackmail.

And, by an amazing coincidence, there just happens to be a sequel to their performance going on in Mexico on the same day called "nothing Gringo." In this scenario all Mexicans are supposed to support a boycott of all American-owned businesses in Mexico. The fact that such a move will harm Mexican people that work for these companies seems to have escaped them. But, then, there must always be some casualties in a Leftist revolution--some collateral demage as it were.

The fact that both of these events in both countries have been coordinated to occur on the same big Communist holiday should tell people something. These big rallies and events are always celebrated or held on some Communist holiday. The first "Earth Day" way back in 1970 just happened to be celebrated on the 100th anniversary of Lenin's birth.

Some of these Hispanic Leftist groups are so rabid that they actually seem to be at odds with each other as to how much of this country they want to wrest from us. The MEChA organization only plans to take back the United States' Southwest for Mexico, while the Mexica Movement is much more greedy. They want the whole continent back from us. They make the slavery reparations folks look like a bunch of rank pikers. They call themselves the "people of Anahuac" and claim the whole continent belongs to them. I have no doubt there are some American Indians in this country that would slightly disagree with them.

Investigative reporter John Taft has noted of MEChA that they openly state: "For the race, everything. For those outside the race, nothing." Sounds a bit racist to me. You don't suppose these folks are racists do you. Naw, couldn't be. Only whites are racist, you know that. No matter how racist other groups are it's not really racism. However, permit me to say that these Anahuac people, or whatever call themselves this week, have got to be among the biggest ethnocentrists in history.

Mr. Taft also noted, in a "News With Views" article that: "MEChA had declared war on the United States, the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence. So far it has done this with impunity and with the help of treacherous senators, congressmen, university officials, along with the enemies of this nation...While filling their bellies and needs at the expense of the American taxpayer, they're plotting the overthrow of this republic in broad daylight." All too true. And what is the response of the federal government toward this invasion--"Guest Worker" status for all the invaders! If they accomplish their ends then it will have been done with the aid and comfort of political traitors in this country--men and women with full knowledge of what they have done.

A Mr. Ikerman, in Arkansas, who read one of my articles emailed me and asked me this question: "When the Mexican population of California, Arizona, New Mexico and part of Texas become more than 50%, and the vote of the people is to join Mexico, at that point, will the Federal government send an army to invade the Southwest territory in order to 'preserve the Union'?" That's a good question--one probably not many folks have given much thought to. My first thought would be "No they won't." And why won't they? Because they realize that the illegals and their Leftist allies are working to create in the Southwest the sort of humanist, anti-Christian culture that the New World Order crowd desires, and so they will simply moan a little publicly to fool the uninitiated and then state their impotence to stop such an action. Should a group of Christian people do the same thing in South Florida or Alabama then the Sherman tanks would roll immediately to "preserve the Union" but for the illegals, zip, zilch, nada.

You have to understand that the desire of many illegals and their Marxist friends are one in the same. They both want sort of a United States of North America, with no borders, controlled by them and their buddies, naturally for the "good" of all the rest of us who will pay for it with our taxes.

So the Communist holiday will be celebrated both in this country and in Marxist Mexico this year with economic boycotts. However, not all will go along willingly. I know of a man in Illinois that has several Hispanics working for him. He has already told them they if they all take the day off and boycott Monday then they shouldn't bother showing up for work on Tuesday.

My personal advice for Monday, May 1st is to go shopping! Do your grocery shopping that day. Buy gas for your vehicle that day. Do some sort of commerce on that day so that you will help to cancel out the illegals attempt at extortion.

After awhile it just gets a bit wearisome having to listen to all these illegal immigrants running around this country screaming about how their "rights" are being trampled on by our not being willing to let them stay here and collect all the freebies. Again, what rights??? If they are here illegally they have no rights in this country--and the politicians who tell them otherwise are just plain liars!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: answer; codepink; cpusa; internationalanswer; marxism; mayday; unitedforpeace; wcw; worldcantwait; wwp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: Thunderstorm Patriot; sinkspur; LS; Liz
There is no indication that Bush is acting for any reason other than to prop up American business profits.

As much as I've been critical of Bush's (lack of) border enforcement policy, I can't bring myself to believe that he's as corrupt as you state. Rather, I agree with suppositions made by other posters: the larger battle is the WoT & Iran.

In this scenario, we can't afford to have a 2nd front in the form of an unstable country on our southern border lurching towards some sort of marxist upheaval. So we let them bleed off their population and let the US taxpayer shoulder the load.

Bush is gambling our long-term national cultural heritage against the nearer-term threat of a nuclear equipped Islamic foe. I just wish he would come out and say so instead of looking like (a) a dunce, and/or (b) a corrupt crony of business interests.

81 posted on 05/01/2006 7:25:44 AM PDT by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

And suppose the majority of them return here legally. Just what will actually change?


82 posted on 05/01/2006 7:26:29 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Do you assume all immigrants get sick? And how do you determine who is legal or illegal? Do you ask to see their papers?"

I assume everyone eventually gets sick.
I also assume if you are illegal you are NOT paying taxes and do NOT have health insurance. I don't need to ask to see their papers, all I have to do is sit back and watch the hospitals go bankrupt.

You still didn't explain how these honorable citizens are paying taxes or why they don't become legal.


83 posted on 05/01/2006 7:27:19 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
1. Citizens of another country who deliberately work to hold our country "hostage" are TERRORISTS. This is an act of terrorism. Our government is supporting it...we are paying for it. Keep reading.

2. Our cities have granted PERMITS to these illegals to rally. This means:

a) Our cities will be paying for security/police whose salaries are PAID FOR BY TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS

b) Our cities will be paying for cleanup of these rallies. That will, of course be PAID FOR BY TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS

c) Our cities will be paying for repair of the damage done at these rallies, which (again) be PAID FOR BY TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS

d) No doubt some of these rally participants will need medical attention today, which will be PAID FOR BY TAXPAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS

WHY DID OUR CITIES GRANT THESE PERMITS????? WHAT KIND OF RECOURSE DO WE, THE TAXPAYERS, HAVE WHEN OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREED TO ALLOW THIS, AND OUR MONEY TO PAY FOR IT???!

If these people were citizens, I would have no problem with them having the right to protest...but they shouldn't share the rights of citizens, they are not citizens!

If they came in legally and did it the right way, I say WELCOME HOME! If they snuck in and are not taxpaying, green-card holding workers, I say round them up and send them back.

84 posted on 05/01/2006 7:28:09 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stompk

I have no way of knowing (and neither do you unless you employ them) who pays taxes and who has health insurance. I don't have health insurance and it makes life very difficult. I have sympathy for them I guess. And growing up in So. Fla. I saw what Cubans did for Miami. It really was a win/win situation there.


85 posted on 05/01/2006 7:30:02 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Vast difference between Cuban immigrants and the illegal, illiterate Mexican variety.


86 posted on 05/01/2006 7:32:34 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: lemura
Agree. I can't stand the isolationists/Buchananites/conspiracy people who think it's all about trade. People actually believe things because they believe them. Bush actually believes he is a humanitarian by being "compassionate" with these illegals. It has nothing whatsoever to do with business profits---quite the contrary, he probably thinks that overall the illegals are hurting American business, but that it's still the "right thing to do."

Many of our great presidents were deeply flawed like this. Teddy Roosevelt was a nincompoop when it came to business and the economy: he savaged corporations, but in the process, research has shown, he severly damaged "small businesses." Great on foreign relations and patriotism, he nevertheless stifled economic growth in his administrations.

Bush was good for two big visions: defeat the Jihadists and revive the economy. He apparently doesn't have a third in him. Ok, neither did the great god Ronald Reagan, who gave out our first amnesty, and who allowed welfare spending to rise and who allowed the federal government to grow under his watch. But he defeated the Soviets and got the economy out of the doldrums.

Presidents, like most people, can only do one or two things really well. After that, it's mush. If you don't believe me, watch me play golf some time.

87 posted on 05/01/2006 7:35:15 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: calex59

yes...have to agree, all those failures sing the same tune....we are finished, it is over, we are finished it is over....


88 posted on 05/01/2006 7:38:05 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

So let's teach them to read. And I doubt if all immigrants from Mexico are illiterate. Why not get rid of our American illiterates while we're at it?


89 posted on 05/01/2006 7:39:15 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LS
While the 'Bent One' was exalted for his ability to compartmentalize, I think Bush is essentially utilizing the same tactic, except in a much bigger geo-strategic game.

He knows our primary threat is Islamic WMDs, which means we just can't afford to take our eyes off the ball in terms of collective focus.

Illegal immigration has to be brought under control at some point, but right now it's like any triage situation: Iran needs immediate attention right now, while Mexico only needs to be managed so it doesn't fall off a cliff. That means continued taxpayer support illegal immigration in the short-term.

90 posted on 05/01/2006 7:45:29 AM PDT by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: lemura

Well, I think we can do a LITTLE better than that. Begin with simple enforcement of who comes in. Then we'll work on the deportations.


91 posted on 05/01/2006 7:47:03 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
I don't have a problem with that. This nation was built by honest, hard-working, legal immigrants. We take in thousands of them each year. What I have a problem with are those who violate our laws and then demand that we change our system to give them the rights that citizens and legal immigrants have worked for.
92 posted on 05/01/2006 7:49:23 AM PDT by Small-L (I love my country, but I despise the politicians who run (ruin) it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
So let's teach them to read.

Why not deport them instead?

Let their government teach them to read. Why should all the services (education, health care, welfare, etc.) be extended to those that crawl in our windows while our government sleeps?

You may doubt forever, but the fact remains that most of those creeping across the border are illiterates. Why else would they come here when our NAFTA agreement has helped so many millions of Mexicans obtain lucrative employment. (Sarcasm)

Unfortunately, in the case of the American citizen illiterates, as long as there is a television to lull them into a stupor they will remain illiterates.

So, why take on the world's idiots?

93 posted on 05/01/2006 7:50:17 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

Well, there is strength in numbers but we'll see how much effect this boycott really has. That will tell how important they are to the U.S..


94 posted on 05/01/2006 7:50:38 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
We simply need a third party in this country that is a strong conservative party and in charge of all 3 branches of the government. A party that reduces the size of the government, secures our borders, enforces its own laws, breaks up monopolistic corporations in the US doing business, gets out of the taxpayers back pocket, continues the WOT, promotes international trade that is fair (i.e. simple realization that no way with our current standard of living and tax burden in the US, that the US worker can compete with the labor costs of 3rd word/communist nations), etc., etc.

The best way to fight the crap is to get the right people in charge of the government.....We must protect ourselves from fascists, etc. at the same time.

95 posted on 05/01/2006 7:53:00 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: mariabush

Like Ann Coulter said: deport a few at a time. Today is a
wonderful opportunity to pick up a million or so!


97 posted on 05/01/2006 8:43:38 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

So what you're really saying is that we need a SECOND party don't we? In our current set-up it seems to me that we have two separate wings of the same socialist party.


98 posted on 05/01/2006 9:14:16 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
Yes. Basically, the are few Zell Millers left in the Democratic party that is in Congress or state governments, anywhere. In the GOP, there may be a few Reaganites in office, but, for the most part, a bunch of RHINOS. Guess political image and repayment to large contributors have the highest priority for any politicians, 'cause, well, frankly, it's been a while since I've seen a true statesman / stateswoman.

What we have been witnessing this past century is the onslaught of societal euthanasia where factions from the Left have pressed ever harder for the growth of the Welfare State. Now, those across the world, less fortunate than many here in the US, have 'heard the word' and are on a stampede to get into America by whatever mean and onto Uncle Sam's coattails for the free handouts and hopefully, amnesty.

Without a doubt the concept and the reality of The Welfare State has been sold as by the media, the schools, and the feds as 'Social Justice".

Political Correctness is by far the most recent and relevant phenomena present to support my personal view as a sincere lack of spine by most politicians.

99 posted on 05/01/2006 9:50:48 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

I call it the Stalinization of America.

"But that’s exactly what the Left’s Walter Durantys and Dan Rathers, who continue to infiltrate the elite media, still don’t understand about the real cost of freedom: It always carries a price tag the Left thinks America shouldn’t pay – despite their daily abusing the free speech and press they employ to ruin their opponents. In effect, McCarthyism was never really about the so-called “blacklisting” that Communist sympathizers decried, as much as it was about exposing the very enemies that are still trying to destroy the U.S."


http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_12577.shtml
This needs to be a thread, but I don't know how to do it.


100 posted on 05/01/2006 10:13:26 AM PDT by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson