Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"
Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J

In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.

Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.

The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 4kooks; alqaedanukes; artbellstuff; globaljihad; hamadmir; iran; irannukes; iranstrikes; jihadinamerica; nukes; rightalk; terrorists; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 601-614 next last
To: RightWhale

"If nukes were being smuggled into the US or Europe or Russia, or China, some would have been discovered."

Really? By whom? Homeland Security? The CIA? FBI? The Border Patrol? Port security?

The whole country is a sieve.


161 posted on 04/28/2006 10:16:06 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Yet.. And on 9/10 nobody would've believed 9/11 was possible either.

I think we should take the 'safe' side and prepare for the worst. And make the enemy clear of what'll happen if/when they decide the jihad is ready to hit the USA again.


162 posted on 04/28/2006 10:16:48 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

ummm...ok? Thanks for your point. Done!!


163 posted on 04/28/2006 10:16:57 AM PDT by repubzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

Destroying their religious sites would be a horifically bad idea. As it stands now it is only a percentage of followers of Islam that are radical combative. The rest just want to live their own life. Taking out their religious sites would just create the ultimate recruiting poster.


164 posted on 04/28/2006 10:17:38 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

So the islamics have an apocalypse... That's a bad thing?


165 posted on 04/28/2006 10:17:42 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

"According to US policy which has been in place for decades, the United States would use ultimate force in retaliation for a nuclear attack."

And if it is Al-Qaeda, where would you strike? Al-Qaeda may have sympathizers in Iran, but Iran is not Al-Qaeda.


166 posted on 04/28/2006 10:18:21 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

Utter nonsense, and that's the same talk the DNC uses to keep us from fighting any islamics. The UN says that too.


167 posted on 04/28/2006 10:18:23 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
...having the Persian race removed from the face of the earth...

I appreciate that sentiment, but Ghengis Khan already did that. Killed every single inhabitant. Today's "Persians" are no such thing, but merely outside interlopers and squatters who moved into the region after the Mongols left.

They sure seem to be as deranged as the originals, though. 'Course, it might be the water, but realistically speaking I think we have to blame islam, and therefore, if we do find it necessary in the future to nuke Iran, I think we should take it much, much further than the borders of Iran since this fight has nothing to do with borders.

168 posted on 04/28/2006 10:20:01 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

How is that nonsense. Rather than just throwing out insults, prove it.


169 posted on 04/28/2006 10:20:16 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Homeland Security? I don't believe that is anything more than a program title and a figurehead director. The night people, cops and crooks, keep watch over this country. Where could the nukes be hidden so a junky wouldn't find one while looking for loot and try to pawn it for a fix? Somebody is always looking someplace: there's hardly a square foot of America that isn't being watched by somebody or other on a regular basis.


170 posted on 04/28/2006 10:21:44 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

"Frankly, showing that their allah is a phoney by destroying mecca may just have a good psychological affect and they'll drop the whole islam madness."

"Just may" is not going to be good enough for a President to go on a worldwide extermination of Muslims.

Seriously, anyone who thinks destroying Islam holy sites is going to silence or stop them must have been living in a cave for the last five years.


171 posted on 04/28/2006 10:21:47 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: LittleBillyInfidel

Good point.


172 posted on 04/28/2006 10:22:05 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Will they nuke San Fransisco, New York, Los Angeles and other terrorist friendly cities?

If they try it on Dallas, San Antonio, Houston, and even Austin; Texans will kick their ass.

Next weekend's Texas Cowboy Memorial Shoot could turn into a live target event. (It will be a live fire event anyway, believe me it will)

173 posted on 04/28/2006 10:22:31 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

The way you are spreading it, you are probably a plant.


174 posted on 04/28/2006 10:23:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

"...there's hardly a square foot of America that isn't being watched by somebody or other on a regular basis."

Good lord. They're not going to put them out on the sidewalk. They coud have been smuggled in a container and secreted to any one of a million storage garages around the country. Is somebody searching all the individual storage units? How about everyones garage?


175 posted on 04/28/2006 10:25:25 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
If they had 'em they would have used them by now.

Your logic fails to account for the possibility that *they just got them*, or will get them soon.

176 posted on 04/28/2006 10:26:39 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
There have been published reports about people stopped at the Mexican border and a NYC subway station because they set off radiation detectors - from drinking barium for a medical procedure.

There was also the huge "scandal" that the FBI was taking radiation detecting equipment around to Islamic sites.

Given that nuclear radiation is that detectable, and that we're looking for it, it would be an enormous risk for Al Qaida to leave smuggled weapons unused in the U.S.

They've had plenty of excuses to use them. Each Iraqi election was another line in the sand. Each anniversary of 9/11, each anniversary of OIF, each anniversary of the Taliban overthrow, the Olympics in Utah and Greece, etc.

177 posted on 04/28/2006 10:26:57 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

"If they try it on Dallas, San Antonio, Houston, and even Austin; Texans will kick their ass."

Exactly how would they do that?


178 posted on 04/28/2006 10:27:29 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Sigh..
Well, ok dhimmi.. Live with islamics, see how it works out for you. I'll choose to fight/draw/live without them.

And if they do things like 9/11? I'll choose to do more.

You may surrender to their allah, but I'm not going to. And I hope our military doesn't either.


179 posted on 04/28/2006 10:27:36 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

You're in a blue state.

Things won't be nice in the red states for islamics after another attack, especially if it's wmd.


180 posted on 04/28/2006 10:28:51 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson