Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/28/2006 4:58:15 AM PDT by snowrip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: snowrip

hangar


2 posted on 04/28/2006 5:00:00 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Comicalness Don't Win No Medals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

The term "hangar queen" reminds me of the late 70's, when you had to keep an aircraft in the hangar to scavange for parts to fix the rest, compliments of Mr. Jimmah carter........


3 posted on 04/28/2006 5:02:49 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When did being white, christian and conservative become a criminal offense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
I had the chance to see one of these in the sky, once.  They can only be described as "eerie".

 

4 posted on 04/28/2006 5:07:02 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ISLAM: The Other Psychosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
The aircraft is not a hangar queen in the classic sense -- where any/all of the avionics, hydraulics, powerplant, electronics are down. It really gets down to optimizing the 'sortie maintenance' procedures. The USAF is doing that/ working on that.

The guys that work on the B-2 KNOW it is an honor to do so, and they bust their butts on every detail, including readiness.

While this article is factual, I think it slams the B-2 too harshly. The B-2 is incredibly effective leading edge technology. We've got some learning to do still.
5 posted on 04/28/2006 5:09:59 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
Why the B-2 is Still a Hanger Queen

Simple...I was on their assembly line. Next question?

8 posted on 04/28/2006 5:15:59 AM PDT by BikerGold (Reliously Uncoorect...Reliously UUUUUUncorrect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

Wanna play, got to pay! High tech gadgets don't come cheap. If they did everyone would have'em, right?


10 posted on 04/28/2006 5:26:58 AM PDT by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

I'm thinking that if I paid $2 billion for a single aircraft, I would spend as much time as possible making sure everything was 100% operational. This ain't like parking your old Buick and turning over the engine once a month.


13 posted on 04/28/2006 5:31:37 AM PDT by EricT. (CA conservatives only serve to inflate the number of electoral votes won by the Dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

Paint robots ?

Like these ?

http://www.durr.com/en/presse/bilder.php?term=ecorp


16 posted on 04/28/2006 5:35:22 AM PDT by globalheater (There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

B-2 - - When only the very best is good enough.



24 posted on 04/28/2006 6:04:10 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principles, - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
But there were quality control problems with the liquid coating, often forcing maintenance crews to go back to tape and paste. Now the quality control problems are thought to be solved, and, if that is the case, the readiness rate of B-2s may go up to 70 percent. Maybe, if everything works out.

Mebbe they could come up with a "dip" like the stuff that is used to coat tool handles.

25 posted on 04/28/2006 6:08:26 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

BUFF ping


29 posted on 04/28/2006 6:19:34 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

It took many years before the B-1B could maintain any kind of realistic readiness. This is the kind of thing that happens when you push a lot of new technology into a single platform. Some of that technology doesn't work as advertised, and the maintenance issues need to be worked through.


54 posted on 04/28/2006 7:18:40 AM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip
Someone really needed to edit this article. It really hurts the credibility of a writer, in my eyes, when they make errors that should have been trained out in middle school. A professional writer should be expected to write a flawless article, not only by skill, but because there are spell checks and grammar checks in every word processing program currently available.

No fewer than five misspellings of hangar, including the title. The writer obviously knows how to spell the word, since it is spelled correctly once.

"that the usual access panels and such on the B-2 must be" would be correct without the word "must."

"because of the result of" should say "as a result of"

"This means, that whenever there is a crises" is one of the most hideous sentence fragments in the whole article. It doesn't need the comma, and "crises" is a plural word.

"A team of four robots were installed, to liquid coating to B-2s" Good grief! A team was installed, and to do what to or with a liquid coating?

"the Indian ocean Still" A missing comma at the end of Indian Ocean, and forgetting the capital 'O.'

I might add that when saying B-2s, it would be a good place for the apostrophe, as in B-2's. It doesn't become a posessive just because of an apostrophe.

All-in-all, this is low-C work. I can't imagine anyone getting paid for it.

69 posted on 04/28/2006 9:31:43 AM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

25 man hours per flight hour isn't really that bad.
The B2 is a pretty big airplane and I don't think they have just one man working on it. Some helo's working in the desert have a worse ratio than that.
25:1 is not the worst number we have to deal with.


129 posted on 05/10/2006 9:44:12 AM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

I thought Joan Crawford was the hanger queen.


136 posted on 05/10/2006 3:09:23 PM PDT by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snowrip

The B-2 was a success before the first craft ever rolled off the line. This plane played a major role in bringing down the Soviet Union because the Russians were so afraid of its capabilities, they spent a huge amount of resources for a new over-the-terrain RADAR system. The threat of the B-2 made the old system obsolete.


146 posted on 05/11/2006 6:56:22 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson