Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What REALLY is driving up oil prices.
4/26/06 | self

Posted on 04/26/2006 6:35:00 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants

Okay, I have seen a LOT of threads claiming that oil companies aren't really making that much on each gallon of gasoline.

Oh, really? (blink, blink) Then explain the record profits by the oil companies.

Why sure. First, US oil companies don't import all of their oil. In fact several companies actually import very little. Where do they get it? Why, from wells on private and federal land that they drilled on years and years ago. What is the extraction cost to get it out of these wells? You can be darned sure that it is nowhere near $75 a barrel. In fact, I read that it is somewhere around $7 to $15 a barrel. Add to this cost a small royalty that they pay the federal government or private land owner and refining and transportation cost and you come up with maybe $25 a barrel.

Now, mix in the oil they bought 3 or 4 months ago at $52 a barrel that is just now coming to the refinery and you have an average of between $25 and $40 a barrel.

So what we have is huge profits at the expense of the consumer. How long will it last? The prices will start to drop once they feel they are starting to harm the economy. Congress and the media and the consumers stop bothering them and they look for the next opportunity to do it all over again.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: collusion; energy; gaspost; gasprices; greed; monopolies; oil; petroleum; refinery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-369 next last
To: FixitGuy

Wish I knew where so many of you all are getting this incorrect factoid that the "cost of production hasn't risen much". Where is that coming from?


301 posted on 04/27/2006 3:19:44 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Do you REALLY believe they are making only 10% profit when their total cost is probably only about a buck? Remember, when gas was so cheap back in '99? They were STILL making a profit when gas was sellinbg for 80 cents a gallon and taxes were half of that!

Ever hear of the profit motive? They are in business to make a profit. That's why they are there. What gives you the right to decide what is a fair profit for someone else's business? Your right is to buy their product - or not - to express your pleasure/displeasure at the way they do business.

I lived through the Carter Oil Embargo of the 70s. Given the choice of having no fuel at prices set by the government and lines around the block EVERY DAY or having plenty of fuel at prices set by the marketplace, I'll take the latter.

The government can't keep the Post Office, Amtrak or Veterans Hospitals afloat and you think their taking control of oil companies will help?

302 posted on 04/27/2006 3:22:32 AM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Don't you think it's probably Opus Dei? And that Karl Rove is the new president or bishop of it? I believe that's his eye on the top of the pyramid on the $ bill. At least, it looks like it to me.


303 posted on 04/27/2006 3:25:12 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Oil is irrelevant.

Go a month without consuming any oil. No products created, transported, fertilized, packaged with the benefit of oil.

Done? Tell me again that oil is irrelevant?

I do get your point that the leftist chant was no blood for oil, but I didn't see them walking to those protests either.

304 posted on 04/27/2006 3:27:02 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I have no choice about gasoline as there is no public transportation in my area.

Move to a new location. Walk or run instead of driving. Ride a bike. Start your own mass transit company.

You see, you do have choices!

305 posted on 04/27/2006 3:36:35 AM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Ahhhh no thanks on the dump I am not the dump kinda person.

BUT not only do FReepers ques that so do our Senators
and BTW my Daughter has worked for Shell for over 10 years
and yes she does have stock. Now I am sorry I didn't get it and reap the benefits , how much do you contribute when you buy gasoline? Love to benefit off of your purchase.

WASHINGTON - A Senate committee Wednesday announced an investigation into taxes paid by major oil companies and asked the Internal Revenue Service for the companies' tax returns.

http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/04/26/377893.html&cvqh=itn_oil


306 posted on 04/27/2006 3:40:48 AM PDT by stopem (To allow a bunch of third world country nationals to divide Americans is unconscionable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: stopem
WASHINGTON - A Senate committee Wednesday announced an investigation into taxes paid by major oil companies and asked the Internal Revenue Service for the companies' tax returns.

Who created the tax spaghetti problem? Who is going to come riding in on their white horse to save us? What GOOD guys they are. Aren't they just wonderful to look out for the "little" people?

Companies pay accountants to take full advantage of our tax laws. They didn't create the hoops to jump through. Want to end the games? Simplify our tax laws. I don't like corporate welfare, period. Hiring people to find the best route through the tax maze is not corporate welfare.

The solution is to take away the life or death power our politicians have over our businesses. By granting tax breaks to some and creating obnoxious regulations for others is how the politicians line their re-election bank accounts.

Trim this power to what was allowed in the constitution and we'll make some progress. With the added benefit of an economy that will prosper like you have never seen in your lifetime. Companies that will rethink fleeing the USA in search of more business friendly climates.

307 posted on 04/27/2006 3:57:45 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Practically...And who's oil is it anyway, the gov'ts', or the people's???

Well said comrade!

I'm one of those people that doesn't believe in property taxes...I figure if I bought the land, I own it...So I think you're a bit confused in calling me comrade...

Apparently you support the idea of the gov't owning the land, even after you've paid for it, and the gov't owning the natural resources...

308 posted on 04/27/2006 3:58:43 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

I'll say again

Here's a shovel. Go get "your" oil.


309 posted on 04/27/2006 4:02:08 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Thats all nonsense. According to your stated view, as soon as a company makes more money than you feel is appropriate it's "greed" but until then it's "a profit". How do these companies get in touch with you to find out when they have made enough and can start losing money on behalf of their share holders?

And do you have a separate number the share holders can call to let you know how they feel about your metric?

310 posted on 04/27/2006 4:05:18 AM PDT by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
I know!! I'll use government force to make a bunch of people build a refinery for me so I can have gas that will make my car run.

I'm one of those few people that still thinks I own the gov't as opposed to the status quo...So yes, if the oil companies refuse to build new refineries, I'll tell my gov't to build some...

And it won't cause a shortage of gasoline as some suggest because someone will refine oil for a billion dollars profit per year instead of 40 billion...

I'm a capitalist but not to the point that I will burn my furniture to stay warm while an oil exec makes half a billion dollars in wages on the oil I can't afford...

311 posted on 04/27/2006 4:07:39 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Who created the hoops and several different agencies specifically designed to make it difficult to build refineries?

Nationalizing our health care has done wonders for the costs. Why should a government built refinery have a different result as the nationalized health care?

And it won't cause a shortage of gasoline as some suggest because someone will refine oil for a billion dollars profit per year instead of 40 billion...

How many years will that "billion" dollar profit sustain your company during the years when profits are slim to none?

A billion dollars profit just waiting to be plucked. I wonder why no one has jumped at this opportunity?

I'm a capitalist

What is the motive for the capitalist to build a refinery?

312 posted on 04/27/2006 4:22:16 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

In a nutshell: ExxonMobil paid over $23 Billion in corporate income tax. That's a 39% income tax rate. ChevronTexaco paid 44%.


313 posted on 04/27/2006 4:32:34 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: FixitGuy
And to boot, the domestic companies own the drilling, production, refining and probably the distribution facilities!

There are many small domestic companies that don't own the refineries...But the larger one are now International companies...And the Arabs who sell the crude own a pretty large share of what we perceive as American Companies...

And you, I or anyone else will probably never again see an independently owned gas station...

314 posted on 04/27/2006 4:56:09 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: The Republic is Lost

No relationship whatsoever to the two items. The bottle water "analogy" has been beaten to death. And it is still worthless.

It falls in line with the liberal argument that because Japan pays twice as much for gasoline, we should be grateful we are only getting raped for $3 a gallon.

BTW, in WalMart you can by bottled water for 75¢ a gallon. So where's your outrage at the cost of gasoline?


315 posted on 04/27/2006 5:23:20 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sabatier

so am i. those are not fine memories.


316 posted on 04/27/2006 5:54:33 AM PDT by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: voteconstitutionparty
There's actually an oil glut.

The record high prices are due to speculation and market manipulation.

At this point, I'd be looking to short oil, because there's plenty of supply to meet demand.

Instead of looking, why are you not making money on this information.

317 posted on 04/27/2006 6:03:31 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Lets take the oil companies profit away. Instead of $3.10 a gallon for gas, it's now $2.99.

Now, how long will the oil companies survive while not making a profit? So they shut down operations in the USA, move the companies offices, refineries and employees to a more business friendly country.

We still need gas. So now we buy it from Exon Mexico. What did we lose here? All of the payroll and SS taxes paid by the oil companies employees AND the CEO, hundreds of thousands of good paying jobs and over two trillion dollars in corporate and other taxes that the oil companies have paid in the last 25 years.

Is the gas any cheaper? Nope, because your still dealing with worldwide demand for gasoline.

Typical leftist solution to a problem. Making everyone equally miserable.


318 posted on 04/27/2006 6:05:56 AM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
And just how am I wrong? It is greed pure and simple

Ayn Rand: "Yes. And your point is?"

319 posted on 04/27/2006 6:06:54 AM PDT by JCEccles (Darwinism is the kazoo in the grand orchestra of science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
" Go a month without consuming any oil. No products created, transported, fertilized, packaged with the benefit of oil. Done? Tell me again that oil is irrelevant?"

The war in Iraq is not about oil. We use cash to buy oil and the military to oppose criminal thugs. The fundamental motivation for sending the military into Iraq is to destroy the criminal jihadi enterprise that operated in Iraq. That enterprise was not the oil market, it was export of death, destruction and terrorism. Oil is irrelevant.

320 posted on 04/27/2006 7:15:13 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson