Posted on 04/25/2006 7:36:56 PM PDT by SUSSA
HAWLEY, PA (April 25, 2006) – 9/11 Families for a Secure America member Peter Gadiel, along with other families who lost loved ones to murders committed by illegal aliens, held a rally at the White House Monday to deliver over 570,000 petition signatures to demand that President Bush enforce immigration laws. Gadiel, who lost his son, Jason Gadiel, on 9/11 in the north tower of the World Trade Center, 103rd floor, made the following statement:
“Families of Americans murdered by illegal aliens held a rally outside the White House on Monday, April 24th, to demand that the president start enforcing immigration law. Also present were Roy Beck and staff members of Numbers USA who had collected over 570,000 signatures on petitions to the president asking him to enforce US immigration law and stop the invasion of illegal aliens.
“We attempted to deliver these petitions to the White House, and after the Secret Service contacted Administration officials, the message was relayed to us that Mr. Bush's minions would not accept them.
“It was not particularly surprising to us, given the president's longstanding policy of refusal to enforce the law; his disregard for the security of the nation and the contempt he has shown for those of us who have seen our loved ones murdered by illegals, or raped, shot or otherwise victimized.
“Nevertheless, each additional refusal by this man who professes a belief in God and has sworn an oath on the Bible to ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God,’ is a further reminder that this president is little different from his discredited predecessor, Bill Clinton.
“The foundation for the 9/11 attacks was prepared by al Qaeda during the Clinton Administration and principal responsibility for America's failure to prevent the attacks lies with Clinton, Albright, Reno and Jaime Gorelick. However, Mr. Bush's refusal to take even minimal action to stop the foreign invasion that has continued during the five and a half years of his term shows that he has as little concern for the security of Americans as Clinton. When there is another terrorist attack, Bush will have to accept full responsibility.
“We were informed later in the day that Mr. Bush had spoken in Orange County, California and that Republican Representative Dana Rohrabacher refused to speak on the same program with him, saying that the president had sold out to the cheap labor lobby. We applaud Mr. Rohrabacher's integrity and good judgment.”
They didn't come into our country through Mexico either.
EXPIRED VISA'S they were here ILLEGALLY.
But you see for some reason only known to them (the ones on this thread attacking us)IF you were one who opposed Meirs and the Dubai deal you are not targeted and attacked and labeled as a "Bushhater" BUT oppose his amnesty program as a deterrment to the safety and security of America and suddenly you are labeled as one who is a Bushhater.
Labels labels, suddenly they are judge and jury as to whether you support the President.
Irregardless of how many times you have stood by him or defended him or supported him, just go ahead and say that you do not support the amnesty issue and OMG you are the worse human that does not deserve to be even called a FR conservative.
Who exactly do they think they are?
We could label them as traitors but we aren't that PETTY!!
Don't care less about those self serving individuals as we could label them but we wouldn't stoop to their lowdown tactics.
I believe you have misunderstood kristinn. Please re-read his answer.
I have met many of the DC chapter and they do not side with RATS...but Bush has and this total amnesty and open borders is his doings.
Bush has stabbed the USA in the back and needs to resign or face impeachment for treason.
See number 46.
Another Democrat.
Having voted for Bush twice and supported his efforts on the WOT I guess I was wrong and you are right. Bush is a Democrat.
Subject: Bush Impeachment - The Illinois State Legislature is Preparing to
Drop a Bombshell Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:55:48 -0700
Source:
OpEdNews.Com
> http://www.opednews.com/
>
> Bush Impeachment - The Illinois State Legislature is Preparing to Drop a Bombshell Utilizing a little known rule of the US House to bring Impeachment charges
> http://tinyurl.com/qwhfo
>
> April 22, 2006
>
> By Steven Leser
>
> The Illinois General Assembly is about to rock the nation. Members of state legislatures are normally not considered as having the ability to decide issues with a massive impact to the nation as a whole. Representative Karen A. Yarbrough of Illinois' 7th District is about to shatter that perception forever.
> Representative Yarbrough stumbled on a little known and never unitized rule of the US House of Representatives, Section 603 of Jefferson's Manual of the Rules of the United States House of Representatives http://tinyurl.com/lqzju ,
which allows federal impeachment proceedings to be initiated by joint resolution of a state legislature. From there, Illinois House Joint Resolution 125 (hereafter to
> be referred to as HJR0125) was born.
>
> Detailing five specific charges against President Bush including one that is specified to be a felony, the complete text of HJR0125 is copied below at the end of this article. One of the interesting points is that one of the
items, the one specified as a felony, that the NSA was directed by the President to spy on American citizens without warrant, is not in dispute. That fact should
prove an interesting dilemma for a Republican controlled US House that clearly is not only loathe to initiate impeachment proceedings, but does not even want to thoroughly investigate any of the five items brought up by the Illinois Assembly as high crimes and/or misdemeanors. Should HJR0125 be passed by the Illinois General Assembly, the US House will be forced by House Rules to take up the
issue of impeachment as a privileged bill, meaning it will take precedence over other House business.
>
> The Illinois General Assembly joins a growing chorus of voices calling for censure or impeachment of President Bush including Democratic state committees in Vermont, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Nevada and North Carolina as well as
the residents themselves of seven towns in Vermont, seventy Vermont state legislators and Congressman John Conyers. The call for impeachment is starting to grow well beyond what could be considered a fringe movement. An ABC News/Washington Post Poll Conducted April 6-9 showed that 33% of Americans currently support Impeaching President Bush, coincidentally, only a similar amount supported impeaching Nixon at the start of the Watergate investigation.
> If and when Illinois HJR0125 hits the capitol and the individual charges are publicly investigated, that number is likely to grow rapidly. Combined with the very real likelihood that Rove is about to be indicted in the LeakGate
investigation, and Bush is in real trouble beyond his plummeting poll numbers.
> His cronies in the Republican dominated congress will probably save him from the embarassment of an impeachment conviction, for now, but his Presidency will be all but finished.
>
ping
It seems the Bush Administration has absolutely no shame.
Showing contempt for those who have had their children murdered.
Does anyone wonder why Bush's approval rating is in the gutter?
Not I. He's done it to himself.
The DC Chapter, especially kristinn, has done a trmendous amount for the conservative movement over the last decade. Your comment is out of line and I feel an apology is in order.
Cognitive dissonance has risen to ridiculous levels around here lately.
I was.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1611802/posts?page=1727#1727
This should be read by all!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1611802/posts?page=1741#1741
If Kristinn had advertised the demonsration to say that he was having a demonstration with Roy Beck/Numbers USA, and afterwards, they were going to march on the Whitehouse to comfront Bush with the petition accusing him of murdering all those innocents, a 1000 freepers would have shown up to join in.
Some of the Visas had expired, which makes them illegal aliens.
Technically, yes. But, the INS was unaware of these expirations. Maybe it should have been aware of them, but it wasn't.
The fact is, these guys were in the country because they were legally allowed in. They didn't sneak in over the border.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.