I don't know what is more amusing
1) He knows the future (i.e. he knows people will not be persecuted
2) He is OK with a law that makes something which should be legal a crime so long as there are no persecutions under it
It was malware
Can you point me to the part of the DCMA that defines and makes an exception for malware?
so hopefully they will lose in court if not suffer fines from governments for their innapropriate actions.
Perhaps he is a lawyer he seems not to care how poor a law or a patent is so long as there can be a long drawn out court case which benefits only the lawyers..
BTW Sparkles: there is only one 'n' in inappropriate..
"Sparkles"...
hahaha!