Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress readies broad new digital copyright bill
CNET ^ | 4/23/2006 | Declan McCullagh

Posted on 04/24/2006 7:51:04 AM PDT by FewsOrange

For the last few years, a coalition of technology companies, academics and computer programmers has been trying to persuade Congress to scale back the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Now Congress is preparing to do precisely the opposite. A proposed copyright law seen by CNET News.com would expand the DMCA's restrictions on software that can bypass copy protections and grant federal police more wiretapping and enforcement powers.

The draft legislation, created by the Bush administration and backed by Rep. Lamar Smith, already enjoys the support of large copyright holders such as the Recording Industry Association of America. Smith is the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that oversees intellectual-property law.

Smith's press secretary, Terry Shawn, said Friday that the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2006 is expected to "be introduced in the near future."

"The bill as a whole does a lot of good things," said Keith Kupferschmid, vice president for intellectual property and enforcement at the Software and Information Industry Association in Washington, D.C. "It gives the (Justice Department) the ability to do things to combat IP crime that they now can't presently do."

During a speech in November, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales endorsed the idea and said at the time that he would send Congress draft legislation. Such changes are necessary because new technology is "encouraging large-scale criminal enterprises to get involved in intellectual-property theft," Gonzales said, adding that proceeds from the illicit businesses are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities."

The 24-page bill is a far-reaching medley of different proposals cobbled together. One would, for instance, create a new federal crime of just trying to commit copyright infringement. Such willful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to 10 years in prison...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; copyright; statists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last
To: FewsOrange
Gonzales said, adding that proceeds from the illicit businesses are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities."

If you download 'Achy Breaky Heart', then the terrorists have already won.

21 posted on 04/24/2006 9:12:12 AM PDT by Sloth (Archaeologists test for intelligent design all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange
What this does is to make it a crime to copy a music CD you legally bought and put it on your I-pod or MP3 player or make a custom mix CD from your favorite music.

The recording industry is living in the 1950s and wants us all to buy a complete CD even if we only like one song and have no means of buying music a song at a time or editing our legal purchases. Somehow I seriously doubt anyone loses money by any massive pirating of Britanny Spears CDs.

22 posted on 04/24/2006 9:26:34 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

There is a difference. Currently, breaking the DMCA for personal use is a civil matter. You can be sued, but you aren't going to go to jail.

This new law makes possession of the tools needed to break copy protection a federal crime with a penalty of up to 10 years in jail.


23 posted on 04/24/2006 10:05:12 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
This new law makes possession of the tools needed to break copy protection a federal crime with a penalty of up to 10 years in jail.

Based on the same "logic" as the above, they'll be arresting all women for posessing the equipment for being a prostitute. 

24 posted on 04/24/2006 11:19:49 AM PDT by zeugma (Anybody who says XP is more secure than OS X or Linux has been licking toads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron

I ws told that Xandros is a good Linux alternative for those who are just starting out on Linux. Is that true or are SUSE or Fedora Core better?


25 posted on 04/24/2006 2:11:14 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
What about Xandros?

P.S. IBM got any jobs available?

26 posted on 04/24/2006 2:12:07 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange
grant federal police more wiretapping and enforcement powers.

Good...just what we need, Homeland security checking to see if are loading tracks from CDs onto MP3 players.
27 posted on 04/24/2006 2:13:37 PM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Yet another reason to NOT vote for Republicans this November...

Oh yeah, we'll all be soooo much better off with the RATS running the country and making everything "free". /RIDICULOUS

28 posted on 04/24/2006 2:53:33 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
The more the industry pushes into the DCMA restrictions, the more I go out and actively look for open source software.

And the less and less content you'll have legal access to, especially as that leftist Stallman takes open source further and further to the left to prevent the "Tivo-ation" of it as he says.

29 posted on 04/24/2006 2:58:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
The recording industry is living in the 1950s and wants us all to buy a complete CD even if we only like one song and have no means of buying music a song at a time

Huh? Ever heard of a "CD Single"? How about "iTunes"?

30 posted on 04/24/2006 3:02:03 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

The pubbies have been doing a great job of running this nation into the toilet. I'm making a last ditch effort to help convince them to do a 180 and return to conservative principles.

If they refuse, then I'm through with them until they do turn around, and I'm willing to suffer through the consequences.


31 posted on 04/24/2006 3:31:14 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Prysson
Criminalizing more teenagers copying music files online is a serious issue.

Actually, it is. It ensures that an overwhelming number of Americans will eventually have SOMETHING they can be busted for, if they become too annoying to anyone in power

"Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We *want* them broken. You'd better get it straight That it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against– then you'll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

-- Ayn Rand, _Atlas Shrugged , Ch. III, "White Blackmail"


32 posted on 04/24/2006 3:43:24 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pctech
I dont know about Xandros, I'm a RedHat / Fedora man myself.

As for jobs at IBM.... tons, in some areas. There is the rule that requires hire reqs sit internal for 2 weeks prior to being opened up to the world but even then, there are lot of jobs listing for IBM on Dice, etc.
33 posted on 04/24/2006 4:00:46 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

And I have not missed it one bit.


34 posted on 04/24/2006 4:06:20 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Another bill written by corporate lobbyists and soon to be rubber stamped by their well-paid servants on Capitol Hill. Instead of trying to ban technology, how about adapting your business model to it?


35 posted on 04/24/2006 5:07:32 PM PDT by Phocion ("Protection" really means exploiting the consumer. - Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

When Hillary gets elected because you couldn't make free copies of music, expect us to come looking for you.


36 posted on 04/24/2006 5:26:55 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

just unreal.


37 posted on 04/24/2006 5:28:24 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

and here is the republican congress - for sale to the very industry, the US media in the form of the RIAA and MPAA - that hates their guts. but for enough campaign cash, they will pass whatever they want.


38 posted on 04/24/2006 5:38:51 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

So you never watch DVD's on your free Linux? Or you don't think those who cracked the encryption and posted it on the internet are doing anything wrong?


39 posted on 04/24/2006 5:39:52 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SirKit

Intellectual property ping!!


40 posted on 04/24/2006 5:44:46 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson