Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger: Relying On Border Wall 'Ludicrous'
CBS13 ^ | None

Posted on 04/23/2006 5:02:12 PM PDT by HEMICRASHBOX

(AP) LOS ANGELES Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Sunday said that building a 700-mile wall along the border with Mexico to deter illegal immigration would amount to "going back to the Stone ages," and urged the federal government to use high-tech gear and more patrols to secure the nation's southern boundary.

"We are landing men on the moon and in outer space using all these great things. I think that other technology really can secure the borders," the Republican governor said in an interview on ABC's "This Week."

"If I say now, 'Yes, let's build the wall,' what would prevent you from building a tunnel? How many tunnels have been built in these last 10 years? I mean, we've detected tunnels left and right that people can drive trucks through," he added.

The comments were Schwarzenegger's most detailed to date on the border wall proposal, which was included in legislation enacted in the U.S. House of Representatives. Schwarzenegger has said previously that fences might be appropriate in some areas, but raised doubts about the effectiveness of a wall snaking along the border.

Speaking on ABC, the governor said, "I think that it will be ludicrous to limit yourself to just building a wall. We're going back to the Stone ages here."

Schwarzenegger said relying on a wall as the only means to stop illegal immigration was "crazy." But at other points he spoke more broadly in opposition to the proposal, on practical and symbolic terms. He alluded to the Berlin Wall, suggesting that such a structure on the U.S. border would send the wrong message to Mexico, "our friends ... our trading partners."

"We can't do that, either," the governor said.

Schwarzenegger, a native of Austria, also repeated his opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants, but provided few specifics of what requirements an illegal immigrant would have to meet to achieve legal status in the United States.

"I think we should give them a chance for redemption," he said.

Schwarzenegger also said it's unrealistic to consider uprooting or driving out the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.

"It would cost $500 billion. Who's going to pay for that?" he asked.

Schwarzenegger immigrated to the United States in 1968 and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1984, but has retained his Austrian citizenship.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnoldonborders; border; california; ludicrous; relying; rino; schwarzenegger; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2006 5:02:14 PM PDT by HEMICRASHBOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

It has worked in Israel, it can work on the US/Mexican border.


2 posted on 04/23/2006 5:02:59 PM PDT by keithtoo (It's STILL not safe to vote Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
...it will be ludicrous to limit yourself to just building a wall

I Agree!

We need the wall, armed guards, and real penalties for breaking the law.

3 posted on 04/23/2006 5:03:41 PM PDT by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

Arnie's really changing his tune.


4 posted on 04/23/2006 5:04:44 PM PDT by HEMICRASHBOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
I don't know if Israel's a good example.

They suffer from terror attacks constantly.

5 posted on 04/23/2006 5:07:19 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX
Schwarzenegger also said it's unrealistic to consider uprooting or driving out the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants. "It would cost $500 billion."

Ending welfare for illegals, going after illegal-hiring employers, and repealing the anchor baby laws would save us money. .....alot of money. AND it would drive millions of the criminals back to their third-world homeland.

6 posted on 04/23/2006 5:07:40 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

USE BOTH!


7 posted on 04/23/2006 5:08:58 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX; Carl/NewsMax
It looks like Ahnold is running to the LEFT of the Hildabeast!

See also:

Hillary Comes Out for Border Wall
NewsMax.com ^ | April 23, 2006 | Carl Limbacher
Posted on 04/23/2006 6:21:47 AM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

Responding to polls showing that a strong majority of Americans support building a wall across the U.S.-Mexican border, 2008 presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton announced Saturday that she backs a border wall plan that would be supplemented by a "smart fence."

"A physical structure is obviously important," Mrs. Clinton told the New York Daily News. "A wall in certain areas would be appropriate."

The News said she also supported deploying a high-tech "smart fence" that could spot people approaching from 200 or 300 yards. Clinton also said the deployment of surveillance drones and infrared cameras should also be considered.

A Time magazine poll released two weeks ago showed that 56 percent of Americans supported building a wall along the entire 2,000 mile U.S.-Mexican border - with only 40 percent opposed...

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

8 posted on 04/23/2006 5:09:25 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

Go back to acting RINOLD, oh wait, you're a has-been now.


9 posted on 04/23/2006 5:09:25 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remove card rapidly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

posting comments from thread I posted and asked to have deleted.. didn;t want to lose the comments. :)

----

To: NormsRevenge
Maria's talking points, I suppose.

2 posted on 04/23/2006 5:05:36 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: NormsRevenge
We don't want a wall, we want a 24/7 patrolled fence array. Fences are much easier to see and shoot through.

3 posted on 04/23/2006 5:05:39 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: Paladin2
Relying on Arnold is ludicrous. Arnold is moving left more and more. I realize we have no alternative but he is starting to grate on me.

4 posted on 04/23/2006 5:07:40 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: NormsRevenge
"We're going back to the Stone ages here."
Arnold has got that right. A lack of border control will take us back to the Stone Age in short order.


5 posted on 04/23/2006 5:07:50 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: Paladin2
No need to reinvent the wheel... Israel has some excellent technology which I'm sure they'd lend to us.


6 posted on 04/23/2006 5:07:51 PM PDT by nj26


10 posted on 04/23/2006 5:10:22 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
"A wall in certain areas would be appropriate."

Looks like she's not supporting the idea of a wall the entire length.

And there already IS a wall in certain areas.

11 posted on 04/23/2006 5:11:24 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Arnie's done now,you can stick a fork in him now.


12 posted on 04/23/2006 5:12:40 PM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

build a wall 1940miles and set the cap at 2.5billion let companies people bid on the contract.


13 posted on 04/23/2006 5:13:28 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
build a wall 1940miles and set the cap at 2.5billion let companies people bid on the contract.

Oops make that $4.9billion for the 1940mile double layered wall

14 posted on 04/23/2006 5:17:15 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

I think busting and fining the businesses that hire illegals in the first place has to be a part of the solution, too.


15 posted on 04/23/2006 5:18:35 PM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX
We did it for decades without a wall relying on naturally ethical behavior on the part of employers and some inland enforcement.

True many employers have slipped their ethical moorings but I'll bet we could still do without a wall & rely instead on inland enforcement.

16 posted on 04/23/2006 5:19:25 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

On the Michael Medvid show, he revealed that Israel will be building a 400 mile wall by the time they are done. You know what, if little Israel can build a 400 mile wall, I think we can build a 2,000 mile wall.


17 posted on 04/23/2006 5:19:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The United 'Door Mats' of America! Go ahead, scrape your feet on it. Everyone else is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

I agree...it makes much more sense to levy a $1 million fine against anyone caught employing an illegal.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 5:19:49 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX; calcowgirl


19 posted on 04/23/2006 5:23:28 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEMICRASHBOX

1. Noone is saying that a wall should be built as the 'only' means to combat illegal immigration.

2. The Berlin Wall nonsense is just that -- complete nonsense.

3. He does support amnesty, whether he wants to admit it or not.


20 posted on 04/23/2006 5:24:56 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson