Turned on 60 Minutes, wondering what CIA thing they would find. They found a guy with a book out. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060874996/104-9030664-2029524?v=glance&n=283155
1 posted on
04/23/2006 4:36:08 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
To: PghBaldy
2 posted on
04/23/2006 4:37:40 PM PDT by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: PghBaldy
To: PghBaldy
Reporter defends release of NSA spy program From the link:
Risen: I think that's for the same reason that this was a story that should be included in the speech, and that it was something that confirmed what they already believed about biological weapons. And I just think there was kind of a go fever on WMD and Iraq, and if you talk to people in the CIA, they felt that there was people like Tyler Drumheller, who raised that issue, were being ignored. And there were people who thought that the management of the CIA was kind of saying, you know, we'll find the WMD when we get there. And that that was the attitude.
If Drumheller was blabbing to Risen, maybe someone should talk to Drumheller...
4 posted on
04/23/2006 4:38:43 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: PghBaldy
Intelligence like this?
www.9-11commission.gov
Page 117
Mary McCarthy, the NSC senior director responsible for intelligence programs, initially cautioned Berger that the bottom line was that we will need much better intelligence on this facility before we seriously consider any options. She added that the link between Bin Ladin and al Shifa was rather uncertain at this point. Berger has told us that he thought about what might happen if the decision went against hitting al Shifa, and nerve gas was used in a New York subway two weeks later.44
Page 128
The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.109This passage led Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was probably a direct result of the IraqAl Qida agreement. Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the exact formula used by Iraq.110This language about al Qaedas understanding with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998.111
5 posted on
04/23/2006 4:39:17 PM PDT by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: PghBaldy
A Traitor speaks out
Like McCarthy, he should be executed, with Americans voting where the execution should take place,and how.
8 posted on
04/23/2006 4:40:30 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Then I say unto you, send men to summon Worms. And let us go to Samarra to collect heads.")
To: PghBaldy
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/qind/ Contributions to Political Committees
DRUMHELLER, TYLER S
VIENNA, VA 22182
LANDRIEU, MARY L
VIA FRIENDS OF MARY LANDRIEU INC
05/11/2005 300.00 25020253365
DRUMHELLER, TYLER S
VIENNA, VA 22182
BUSINESSMAN
PRYOR, MARK LUNSFORD
VIA MARK PRYOR FOR US SENATE
06/09/2005 500.00 25020320459
Total Contributions: 800.00 (BOTH Democrats...)
9 posted on
04/23/2006 4:41:51 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
To: PghBaldy
Those pesky republicans ignored the good intell we told them about Saddam not being a bad guy and loving his neighbors and swallowed the bad intel we gave them about Saddam being a homicidal dictator and wanting to kill every American he can with the help of Osama bin stoopid.
Good thing this guy doesnt still work for my government.
GEEEZZ!
10 posted on
04/23/2006 4:42:23 PM PDT by
Delta 21
( MKC USCG - ret)
To: PghBaldy
13 posted on
04/23/2006 4:45:48 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: PghBaldy
14 posted on
04/23/2006 4:47:32 PM PDT by
RBMN
To: PghBaldy
no mention of the statement by Tyler Drumheller's boss??? "It's a slam dunk"????
17 posted on
04/23/2006 4:49:47 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: PghBaldy
This is the meme of the day.
WMD was not the sole reason or even the primary reason for going into Iraq. The first World Trade Center attack traces back to Saddam. If you scratch a little, the second one traces back to him as well. Al Qaeda was a hired gun in a "false flag" operation.
Furthermore, Tyler admits himself that CIA was delivering conflicting information. When you're the guy at the top, you have to choose which one you believe, and go with it.
Either could be wrong; what is the consequence if Saddam has no WMD and you take him out anyway? What is the consequence if he has WMD and you fail to act?
As for nukes, its not just a nuclear program, they can be bought on the market; if Saddam wants a nuke, sooner or later he's going to get one. Every few months, before the war, they would bust a gang trying to smuggle nuclear materials out of the former USSR. Do you take him down before he gets one, and suffer the political consequences, or do you wait until he provably has one and now your options just got a lot narrower?
If this is what passes for analysis at CIA, heaven help us.
18 posted on
04/23/2006 4:52:39 PM PDT by
marron
To: PghBaldy
Anybody who wants to know the facts knows Saddam had WMD's.
20 posted on
04/23/2006 4:58:13 PM PDT by
jwh_Denver
(Rain-X is making wiper blades?)
To: PghBaldy
And each piece came titled: This is the good stuff or this is the bad stuff.....right. He was to pick what would do nothing, like evey democrat wanted.
To: PghBaldy
while the intelligence community did give the White House some bad intelligence, it also gave the White House good intelligence which the administration chose to ignoredamn that Bush for not knowing what's good and what's bad intelligence from what you give him is that it??? please.
26 posted on
04/23/2006 5:37:32 PM PDT by
Chode
(1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT. American Hedonist ©®)
To: PghBaldy
The former highest ranking CIA officer in Europe, Tyler Drumheller, also says that while the intelligence community did give the White House some bad intelligence, it also gave the White House good intelligence Which is exactly why the President is required to make decisions. If you don't agree with them, it doesn't mean he lied.
29 posted on
04/23/2006 6:08:39 PM PDT by
pfflier
To: PghBaldy
"the intelligence community did give the White House some bad intelligence, it also gave the White House good intelligence which the administration chose to ignore" What a bunch of total babbling idiots. I suppose we're supposed to believe the bad intelligence came in a red folder labeled "Bad Intelligence" and the good intelligence came in a yellow folder labeled "Good Intelligence"?
To: PghBaldy
Turned on 60 Minutes, wondering what CIA thing they would find. They found a guy with a book out.
WHAT! I find that hard to believe.
/sarcasm
34 posted on
04/23/2006 9:51:41 PM PDT by
Valin
(Purple Fingers Rule!)
To: PghBaldy
35 posted on
04/24/2006 6:56:26 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: PghBaldy
Tyler Drumheller
36 posted on
04/24/2006 8:07:52 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson