Skip to comments.
Family paid leave on Mass. agenda
Proposal in Senate is nation's most generous
The Boston Globe ^
| April 23, 2006
| By Andrea Estes
Posted on 04/23/2006 6:39:51 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
Senate leaders this week will propose legislation to offer all workers in Massachusetts up to 12 weeks' paid time off to care for newborn and adopted children or sick family members, financed by an employee payroll premium of at least $1.50 a week.
The bill, which would pay employees their full salary, up to $750 a week, would create the most generous paid leave policy in the nation.
''What family hasn't been touched by some emergency," said Senate President Robert Travaglini, who will formally unveil the proposal Tuesday before the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce. ''I've been through physical and medical problems. Knowing you're not going to lose your job and you will continue to be compensated will provide significant comfort."
The premium amount has not yet been determined, but Travaglini aides said it would likely be between $1.50 and $2.50 a week.
Under the bill, all employees would be required to pay into the fund, regardless of whether they believe they would ever take advantage of the benefits.
The premium proposal comes only days after Beacon Hill lawmakers enacted a healthcare law that includes a $295 per worker tax on employers that do not provide health insurance coverage.
Ann Bookman, executive director of the MIT Workplace Center, predicted the plan could help stem the exodus of workers out of state. ''People see this as something for working families," she said. ''But it will help employers. It will create a more stable and more engaged workforce. Workers won't have to worry they'll lose their jobs if they exercise their right to leave. This will send a message -- we want Massachusetts to be a model for workers at different income levels.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: deaththroes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Worker's may flock back to the Gay State but they would meet their employers going the other way.
To: Semper Paratus
well, they don't call it a "commonwealth" for nuttin!
To: Semper Paratus
Ann Bookman, executive director of the MIT Workplace Center, predicted the plan could help stem the exodus of workers out of stateWar is Peace
Ignorance is Strength
Freedom is Slavery
3
posted on
04/23/2006 6:44:51 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
To: Semper Paratus
......between $1.50 and $2.50 a week. You mean for $2.50 a week, I can get a 12 week paid vacation every year?
Where do I sign up!
4
posted on
04/23/2006 6:52:20 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: Semper Paratus
The small employer who tried to operate with a legal workforce is already in the grave, these new burdens are just more dirt shoveled onto his coffin.
To: Semper Paratus
Francachusetts. Film at 11.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
6
posted on
04/23/2006 6:57:51 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Semper Paratus
-"the most generous paid leave policy in the nation."-
According to my Reverse Lefty Dictionary, "generous" means "stupid".
To: Semper Paratus
Senate leaders this week will propose legislation to offer all workers in Massachusetts up to 12 weeks' paid time off to care for newborn and adopted children or sick family members, financed by an employee payroll premium of at least $1.50 a week.
The premium proposal comes only days after Beacon Hill lawmakers enacted a healthcare law that includes a $295 per worker tax on employers that do not provide health insurance coverage.
Francochussetts strikes again!
What company owners in their right minds would keep their companies in that state. Or what entrepreneur would start a company under such government dictated controls? Only in France and other communist countries should you expect such dictated government mandates to companies.
8
posted on
04/23/2006 7:00:54 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: Lockbox
Average salary of 700 per week x 12 = 8400.00.
2.50 per week x 52 = $230.00.
That's liberal math alright.
To: AmericanChef
And it aint generosity when it is compelled.
10
posted on
04/23/2006 7:04:14 AM PDT
by
Montfort
(Check out the 200+ page free preview of The Figurehead by Thomas Larus at lulu.com/larus)
To: adorno
Or what entrepreneur would start a company under such government dictated controls? Starting a business in MA already requires a bewildering array of permits, licenses, and inspections.
11
posted on
04/23/2006 7:07:36 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
To: Semper Paratus
12
posted on
04/23/2006 7:08:46 AM PDT
by
Starboard
(Liberal superiorists hate the system that allows average people to make more money than they do.)
To: Semper Paratus
Fidelity has moved some of its offices to New Hampshire!
Could this be a trend?
13
posted on
04/23/2006 7:13:12 AM PDT
by
petkus
To: Semper Paratus
Avg salary $700 700*12=8400 Emplyoyee tax $2.50 2.50*52=230 Employer tax UNKNOWN Using your numbers, 8400/230=36.52 It will take 36.52 "contributions" to pay for one "vacation." Wonder how long it will be before they realize that the employer "MUST" contribute. It is only a matter of time and the amount.
Why not make the employer pay the entire $8400? (sarcasm)
14
posted on
04/23/2006 7:20:14 AM PDT
by
RdhseRat
To: Semper Paratus
Here's what happens to Mass. employers if they don't comply:
To: petkus
Fidelity has moved some of its offices to New Hampshire! They are also moving IT from Boston to their large Smithfield RI campus and hiring new workers there.
To: Semper Paratus
Look for a new cottage industry to spring up.
Crooked doctors willing to certify the "sickness" of family members who need in-home care for, say, at least 12 weeks.
To: Semper Paratus
we want Massachusetts to be a model for workers at different income levels. This will turn into an 'entitlement' because, after all, the employees 'paid' for it, and $1.50-$2.50 a week will not be even close to enough. But, who am I to judge. History has shown that central government planning works. (/S)
18
posted on
04/23/2006 7:37:16 AM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And here's what happens to Mass. employers if they don't want to comply:



=====================
And here's the look on Mass. politicians:
19
posted on
04/23/2006 7:39:36 AM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: Semper Paratus

|

|
|
Welcome to Massachusetts. |
20
posted on
04/23/2006 7:44:28 AM PDT
by
Fintan
(Somebody has to post stupid & inane comments. May as well be me...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson