Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MYT - New Technology that's real
Nasa Tech Briefs ^ | 4/22/06 | Waverunner

Posted on 04/22/2006 4:51:02 AM PDT by Waverunner

Emhart/Tech Briefs Contest Winners 2005 - Entry MYT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine

Name: Raphial Title of Entry: MYT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine Category: Transportation Illustration

Description of Entry 292

Emhart/Tech Briefs Contest 2005 Entries Description of Entry 292 Description: The MYT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine is a revolutionary internal combustion engine for the next millenium. The first prototype model exerts 850 cubic inches of displacement even though the size is only 14" diameter by 14" long, weighing in 150 lbs. The reason why the MYT Engine is so huge in displacement is because of frequent firing. It fires 16 times in one rotation, making it equivalent to 32 cylinder, four stroke engine. We received US Patent #6739307, and announced the birth of the MYT Engine to public during the SEMA Show last week in Las Vegas. The basic principle is the following. There are two disks each connected to four pistons in a toroidal cylinder. The disks rotate alternately generating the four stroke principles between the pistons. There is no need for valves since the position of the pistons allow wide open port to breathe air. The MYT Engine has been tested with fuel and air motoring on our Dynamometer. The calculation of the 850 CID is the following. CID = pi * radius * radius * stroke * # of pistons (firings) = 3.14 * 1.5 * 1.5 * 3.75 * 32 = 848 cubic inches. The application of the MYT Engine is in all kinds of transportations, automobiles, trucks, airplanes, ships, and distributed and stationary power generations. The MYT Engine with four more ports also works as air motor, air and liquid pump, and air and liquid compressor, with positive displacement, high volume, and high flow. Amazingly, the part count is less than 25 parts even though it's 32 cylinder


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: engine; oil; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Foe all you perpetual motion freepers, a real breakthrough in engine design. fot technical info see www.angellabsllc.com
1 posted on 04/22/2006 4:51:04 AM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

What does it sound like with glasspack mufflers?


2 posted on 04/22/2006 4:53:13 AM PDT by Pete'sWife (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

Answer the simple questions:

How many horsepower?

How much torque?

How many MPG for any given power/weight ratio?



3 posted on 04/22/2006 4:53:43 AM PDT by Glenn (There is a looming Tupperware shortage. Plan appropriately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
Answer the simple questions

These don't matter. It's massive, yet tiny.

ML/NJ

4 posted on 04/22/2006 4:57:38 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

You have something against the word "for"? You avoided using it twice. Just kidding.


5 posted on 04/22/2006 5:01:49 AM PDT by sinclair (If fences don't work, tear down the one around the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinclair

Sorry, fat fingered typing in the dark

There are videos and tech info on the engines and it's principles at www.angellabsllc.com

It's 850 HP from 150lbs, with only 25 moving parts.
You can guarantee the chinese will copy it asap.

I want the 2.4 liter ( 4.5 inch dia) version for my jetskii.

I'm working on getting more info thru work, we want to build one.


6 posted on 04/22/2006 5:07:01 AM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

I, too, have a massive yet tiny engine.

But perhaps I've shared too much.


7 posted on 04/22/2006 5:08:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz (THE FUTURE IS NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

Hmmmm. Investment material?


8 posted on 04/22/2006 5:10:16 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Cue up the opening chords of "Gigantic" by the Pixies, lol.


9 posted on 04/22/2006 5:14:30 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Who did you share ut with?

But perhaps it's none of my business.


10 posted on 04/22/2006 5:23:00 AM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pete'sWife

Fat man in a little coat! Fat man in a little coat!


11 posted on 04/22/2006 5:24:50 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
Oh My Gosh!!!! Watch these videos- 150 MPG?!? I pray to God that his isn't a hoax.
12 posted on 04/22/2006 5:34:30 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (My donation to the GOP went here instead: http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Who did you share ut with?

Anybody who'll start the motor... :^)

13 posted on 04/22/2006 5:54:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz (THE FUTURE IS NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

They do need investment capital. According to their site, they haven't actually tested it with actual fuel, because if there's a problem they won't have their only MYT to take to Demonstrations with them...


14 posted on 04/22/2006 5:55:30 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Investment material?

When you quadruple your money in that, perhaps you could fund my brake design. Instead of converting braking to deadly dust and heat, my system converts braking to energy stored in both a battery and fly-wheel system. I've never been able to interest anyone in it and I don't understand why. It's such a reasonable and green concept.

15 posted on 04/22/2006 6:02:27 AM PDT by Glenn (There is a looming Tupperware shortage. Plan appropriately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

"According to their site, they haven't actually tested it with actual fuel, because if there's a problem they won't have their only MYT to take to Demonstrations with them..."

Sounds like a garbage to me. If they don't have enough faith in their own design to test their engine why should anyone else waste their time on it.

Sounds like yet another snake oil salesman.


16 posted on 04/22/2006 6:30:27 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

"Sounds like yet another snake oil salesman."

Their website is long on photos and what little information there is, is poorly written to the point that it casts suspicion, imho. I'd like to be wrong about this, but you're probably right in your assessment.


17 posted on 04/22/2006 7:11:26 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Last video shows it running briefly on something.

Principle is sound, but seals are going to be a big problem.


18 posted on 04/22/2006 7:19:49 AM PDT by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Is that a crank start, or do you jump-start it?


19 posted on 04/22/2006 7:20:17 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

When you quadruple your money in that, perhaps you could fund my brake design. Instead of converting braking to deadly dust and heat, my system converts braking to energy stored in both a battery and fly-wheel system. I've never been able to interest anyone in it and I don't understand why. It's such a reasonable and green concept.




I don't understand why this approach hasn't emerged somewhere either. I'm not an engineer, but I believe you are referring to a type of system where the car is braked by using the forward momentum to essentially wind up some type of spring. Then, to move again, the energy in the spring is released, propelling the car. N'est-ce pas? It's a wonderfully elegant and seemingly very efficient idea, especially since cars use a disproportionate amount of energy in the acceleration phase.


20 posted on 04/22/2006 7:20:43 AM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson