Posted on 04/21/2006 11:14:50 AM PDT by blam
Java Man's First Tools
Richard Stone
INDO-PACIFIC PREHISTORY ASSOCIATION CONGRESS, 20-26 MARCH 2006, MANILA
About 1.7 million years ago, a leggy human ancestor, Homo erectus, began prowling the steamy swamps and uplands of Java. That much is known from the bones of more than 100 individuals dug up on the Indonesian island since 1891.
But the culture of early "Java Man" has been a mystery: No artifacts older than 1 million years had been found--until now. At the meeting, archaeologist Harry Widianto of the National Research Centre of Archaeology in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, wowed colleagues with slides showing stone tools found in sediments that he says were laid down 1.2 million years ago and could be as old as 1.6 million years.
The find, at a famous hominid site called Sangiran in the Solo Basin of Central Java, "opens up a whole new window into the lifeways of Java Man," says paleoanthropologist Russell L. Ciochon of the University of Iowa in Iowa City.
Although hominids apparently evolved in Africa, Indonesia is a Garden of Eden in its own right, with a wealth of H. erectus fossils.
The startling discovery 2 years ago of "hobbits"--the diminutive H. floresiensis of Flores Island--added a controversial new hominid to the Indonesian menagerie.
In 1998, Widianto found stone flakes in the 800,000-year-old Grenzbank layer at Sangiran, whose well-plumbed sediments reach back 2 million years.
Then in September 2004, his team struck gold in a layer dated by extrapolation from the rocks around it to 1.2 million years ago.
Over 2 months, they unearthed 220 flakes--several centimeters long, primarily made of chalcedony, and ranging in color from beige to blood red--in a 3-by-3-meter section of sand deposited by an ancient river.
The find, not yet published, could be even more spectacular than Widianto realizes, says Ciochon.
His team, which also works at Sangiran, has used ultraprecise argon-argon radiometric methods to date the volcanic strata overlying the levels excavated by Widianto to 1.58 million to 1.51 million years ago--making the flakes at least 1.6 million years old.
If the flakes were undisturbed, Ciochon says, they would represent "some of the earliest evidence of the human manufacture of stone artifacts outside of Africa." Their antiquity would match that of the oldest flakes found in China, at Majuangou, dated to 1.66 million years ago and also made of chert.
Indonesian tool kit. Homo erectus used small, finely worked tools on Java. CREDIT: RETNO HANDINI
But not everyone is convinced. Although the chert flakes are abraded, possibly by water, a few limestone flakes are remarkably sharp.
"The difference in preservation condition could indicate that we are dealing with secondary deposition," or flakes of different ages mixed together, cautions archaeologist Susan Keates of Oxford University in the U.K., who was at the talk. Others disagree.
"I feel their excavation is reliable, because the deposits are thick and undisturbed," says Hisao Baba, curator of anthropology at Japan's National Science Museum and the University of Tokyo, whose team has also uncovered H. erectus fossils and flakes on Java.
The Sangiran flakes "are fundamentally different"--smaller--than the stone choppers made by H. erectus in Africa, says Ciochon.
The evidence, he argues, suggests that Java Man had to range far for small deposits of good flint or chert and so created small, finely worked tools in contrast to the larger tools found in Africa.
Considering the scarcity of raw materials on Java, Ciochon says, it's "a remarkably fine technology."
Widianto will resume excavations in June. "I will be going deeper and deeper, older and older," he promises.
Because it represents a sudden increase in cognitive output over a relatively short period of time that dramatically increased the fitness of AMH relative to existing Homo species.
LOL
Exactly my point!
Contemporaneous with the second migration out of Africa (that displaced or merged with, depending on who you believe, existing hominin populations), Homo sapiens began using new and far more complex tool technologies 40-50,000 years ago, began using art and burying their dead, began building living structures, and were living in larger and more complex societies. It was a radical transformation that took place in a fairly short period of time and completely changed the way hominins lived and behaved.
We had to work through issues resulting from billions of years of repressed memories...horrifying memories...I really can't go there right now.
So what caused this sudden burst of cognitive output?
Why? You're confusing cognitive and morphological evolution.
Yes, it would be amazing and we should have colonies in space by now... if we had really been around for a million years.
Maybe, if anatomically modern humans had been around for one million years, but we haven't been. I also think you more than slightly discount the costs associated with the earliest paleolothic tool technologies -- the jump from no tools to the simplest stone tools to more complicated, designed stone tools represents a much greater cognitive shift than the jump from chariots to corvettes.
I'm not sure there was a "cause," per se, but evidently a population stumbled on a winning formula that made them and their descendents much more fit than other hominin populations. Think of it as analogous to the discovery of iron, 3000 years ago: populations that had iron in a very short time were able to overrun every population in Eurasia that didn't have iron.
Another part of it is a population question -- these more advanced hunter/gather societies were able to support far larger populations that essentialy swamped what had been there before.
There is documented, gradual evolution in tool technologies leading up to this explosion, but if you're asking what the key turning point was, I don't know.
But why did it take so long?
When exactly were there "no tools"?
Now that you put it that way...dinner forks are really overrated.
Paranthrapoids had tools as far back as 2.4mya, but as this article shows, there's no evidence H. erectus/ergaster used tools until 1.5mya.
"We had to work through issues resulting from billions of years of repressed memories...horrifying memories...I really can't go there right now."
That's a keeper.
> But it wasn't until 50,000 years ago or so that we really had the explosion in technology, art, etc. that allowed humans to take over the world. What's amazing isn't that that explosion didn't happen earlier, but that it happened at all.
Three cheers for the Toba supervolcano and the near-extinction of the early humans as a result! Those who survived had to be the smarter and cleverer ones. Once the "jocks" got weeded out, the early "nerds" were able to lead humanity on it's road to the stars.
First, you boil the rocks
Nope, archeologists will claim it is public history, so not only will you not be rich, but they will take via Imminent (Yes I, not E) Domain and you get nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.