I assume it's your definition of "normal" that must be used?
If I had a case before a judge - I don't think what the judge does in bed would have much bearing on my case.
Do you ask your judge if they indulge in oral sex before you'll let them hear your case? To many - that would be considered a "disorder". To some, anything other than the missionary position for reasons of procreation is "not right". Do we determine our judges on that criteria?
If not, why not?
I've never understood why some folks get so worked up over somebody else's taste in sex. Do you care about their taste in food? Both sex and food are bodily functions - they both have people who have different tastes. Why is taste in sex so much more important than taste in sex?
It goes beyond what they do in bed. Clearly if they are driven to abuse their bodies for some warped and unnatural gratification then they have deeper mental disorders that should be addressed before they are to take on serious responsibilities. They are no different than people who gain sexual gratification from starting fires or killing animals.
Do you ask your judge if they indulge in oral sex before you'll let them hear your case?
No, but occasional unnatural behavior is a far cry from the "identity psyche" that drives mentally disturbed people such as homosexuals. If such a judge were to go around declaring himself as an "oralsexual" person and marched in parades with oral sex themes, and placed stickers on his car and demanded that government teach children in schools about his unnatural sexual practices, then yes that would concern me.
I've never understood why some folks get so worked up over somebody else's taste in sex. Do you care about their taste in food? Both sex and food are bodily functions
Again their disturbed behavior transcends "taste" in sexual positions. And yes, I would care about their taste in food if they went around eating rocks or drinking motor oil. Such things might not kill them but would likely make them sick (the way homosexual sex does). Such behavior would also be indicative of a disturbed person whom I wouldn't want to serve as a superior court judge.