Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FairTax: Abolish IRS, Repeal 16th ammendment...
Redstate ^ | Apr 17th, 2006 | Bioinformaticus Maximus

Posted on 04/18/2006 10:21:21 AM PDT by Eaglewatcher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: annelizly

Your public (gubbermint) schools are managed by your local school board, your state board of education, and the Federal Department of Education. Two out of three of those are unneeded (and you know which two). Imagine the money you could save and plow into your school system.


21 posted on 04/18/2006 3:33:11 PM PDT by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

bttt! keepin the squirrels busy today, I see. good for you!


22 posted on 04/18/2006 3:34:05 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
...it does not want to be known as an income tax cut for those who don't have to spend every dollar they make to live.

Leaving something out aren't we? It would un-tax the poor, even insulating them from SS and medicare taxes since everyone would receive a prebate of all sales taxes needed to purchase life's basic necessities. At the same time, those who make and spend a lot of money will pay a lot more in taxes. Those who make and save a lot of money won't pay as much. Those who make very little money will pay next to nothing.

23 posted on 04/18/2006 3:37:51 PM PDT by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt; ancient_geezer

With the geez around there is no rest for the SQL's. They must guard their jobs - I mean nests 24/7.


24 posted on 04/18/2006 3:40:51 PM PDT by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
It would be intolerable if it were true. It's not.

How do you know?

They pay taxes now every time they purchase something here - don't forget those embedded taxes!

Yeah, so do we. But they don't spend hours on tax returns and stroke a big check every year. We do.

So Chrysler goes under instead? That's better?

All of the economists I have read say that the fair tax would be a huge boon to the economy. What's good for the economy is good for Chrysler.

Of course, the bill the does nothing to repeal the 16th Amendment, so we would probably be stuck with both a federal sales tax and the income tax. Not good.

Of course the bill is predicated on repeal of the 16th.

And, the bill does nothing to rein in government spending at all

Invalid point. It doesn't cure cooties either. It merely replaces the income tax. We'll deal with spending on another thread.

25 posted on 04/18/2006 3:52:19 PM PDT by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: groanup; balrog666

Doesn't cure cooties, but it does level the global playing field, and it does defang the WTO......because the FairTax is fully border adjustable. Income based fundamental tax reform proposals are not border adjustable, perpetuate the pretense by which the WTO descriminates against our goods....and amount to being "Stuck on Stupid." Enough. Time to enact the Fairtax.

http://www.iie.com/publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=197


26 posted on 04/18/2006 9:40:52 PM PDT by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Filo

You've had it pointed out to you on another thread that if it became law today, the revenue neutral rate would be about 19%.

Show us how your 15% is revenue neutral and includes the prebate and we're on board.


27 posted on 04/19/2006 8:23:43 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

How 'bout repealing the 18th????


28 posted on 04/19/2006 8:26:40 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newcthem

Si!!!


29 posted on 04/19/2006 8:28:26 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Tha amount of taxes that those in the illegal economy pay via the embedded taxes is vanishingly small since only the portion represented by the profits of the seller are taxed; the balance is merely the increased cost to the purchaser and not tax revenue.

the FairTax bill doesn't need o repeal the 16th (in fact, cannot since a repeal bill has greatly different requirements from a tax bill - as does a spending bill). The bill does eliminate the income/payroll taxes (along with others), the IRS, and requires the destruction of tax records. It also calls for the repeal of the 16th,

Altering the tax system help taxpayers get back in control of government spending while leaving it in the manipulative hands of the pols does not at all - and never will.


30 posted on 04/19/2006 8:34:51 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Show us how your 15% is revenue neutral and includes the prebate and we're on board.

I wouldn't even try. If you've read what I wrote, as you claim you have, you'd realize that I have no interest in revenue neutral. What I want to do is starve the government into submission and then beat it to death.

15% is a good starting point at which the government would have to kill between 20 and 25% of its current programs. After that we keep cutting the number down until we hit about 5% at which point the military still exists along with a few critical programs and absolutely nothing else

At that point we're virtually free of corruption and pork and we have a thriving economy that isn't being held back by institutionalized theft.

In short, it's win-win.
31 posted on 04/19/2006 9:59:33 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Filo

Ah, but you'll never get your "starve the government" bill passed unless it IS revenue neutral.

that's the beauty of the FairTax - it IS revenue neutral yet the resulting operation gives us as taxpayers the ability to reduces taxes paid thereby "starving the government" - and your idea has no possible hope of doing that.


32 posted on 04/19/2006 11:09:33 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jibaholic
I think term limits make more sense. One and done.

I couldn't agree more. Service in congress either as a member of the house (3 terms max) or as senator (1 term) should serve only as resume fodder for your life in the regular world the rest of us live in. It should only be a bullitt point on the resume, e.g. *Served as Senator from NY 2000-2006.

33 posted on 04/19/2006 11:18:37 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
that's the beauty of the FairTax - it IS revenue neutral yet the resulting operation gives us as taxpayers the ability to reduces taxes paid thereby "starving the government" - and your idea has no possible hope of doing that.

No, it's revenue positive. The government stands to experience a real windfall if they get the extra 4% they are trying for with the 23% rate.

Yes, you are right that the FairTax has a better chance of passage - now.

But if the sheeple would wake up and realize they are being sheared the revolt would make passage of a 15% or even 10% "FairTax" a simple matter.
34 posted on 04/19/2006 11:19:43 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Filo

It's very clear that the rate will be decreased to match whatever the revenue neutral rate (now about 19%) is aat the time of paggage - could be either lower or higher.

One of the main objectives is to make everyone aware how inefficient from a dollar standpoint "their" government is and what it really costs.

IAE, the bill will be revenue neutral when passed, not positive or negative.


35 posted on 04/19/2006 12:41:13 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson