Posted on 04/18/2006 5:41:21 AM PDT by LibertyLee
'he was quite snarly and dismissive to my comments the other day, and he was not solicitous of any other opinions, just leaving with the comment that "because obviously you know nothing".'
Not what I have found, and believe me, I have been a critic of Illegal immigration (got your emphasis). I live in California, and have been quite vocal on this thread. Never has Tony been condescending, and always respectful. Could you have taken some comments out of context? As I said before, perhaps something could be lacking in your presentation of your views.......respectful usually works quite well. We're not on the thread to beat each other over the head with our opinions, but to share them, and hopefully educate at some times, and learn at others. There is very little black and white in the world, and we all need to learn that by working with the shades of gray we'll accomplish more. The tactic of everyone yelling and no one listening doesn't work well.....as evidenced by our Congress critters! ;>)
Me too! He can do it and they never know what hit them! And he gets lots of information from his call-in guests that no one else would.
Bet that would draw a larger audience than "Idol".
What does SCAAP stand for, nic?
That must be interesting: filing tax returns on somebody else's S.S. number...
But I think if they are in fact filing returns, it's for an altogether different purpose:
My wife works at a place that employs a number of shall we say, "unusually documented" cabinet-makers.
They first go to either Wisconsin or North Carolina to get an I.D.
When they come here, their W-2s all show that they have at least 13 dependents; so, they're not paying any withholding at all.
If these guys were filing returns, then, they'd be getting "refunds" due to the so-called "Earned Income Credit" that amounts to nothing more than a hand-out.
"I have never, repeat never, said "obviously you know nothing."
I call your attention to posting Number 56 in this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1616131/posts?q=1&&page=51
Apparently someone is using your name if it was not you that made the referenced posting, and you should notify the moderator.
Is this an "ad hominem" attack or an "ad hybrid" attack?
You folks crack me up! You lob these snarky remarks while Tony is trying to conduct his radio program. You know he is at a bit of a disadvantage at the moment to answer you. Take your "disagreement with Tony" off the thread & do it through FReep mail where at least he has a chance to answer you fully!
Good morning TOL, have I missed another immigration free for all?
Just as with OJ, the introduction of the race card makes it difficult to get the real facts.
YUP
In 205, oil was the highest incomce producer.
Says something, doesn't it?
I wish I could remember where I read that but I was so outraged, I had to shut down the PC and go do something else. Vacuuming seemed more enjoyable than reading statistics like that!
Also, according to this document, "Detailed Information on the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program Assessment"
A major flaw in the program design is that it permits States/jurisdictions to use the SCAAP payments for any purpose, not just incarceration of criminal aliens--nor necessarily any criminal justice purpose. For many jurisdictions, this means that correctional facilities never benefit from the funding, nor do local police or prosecutors.I haven't studied this program enough to make any final conclusions, but it seems that, rather than do away with funding monies altogether to the states/local jails, changes should be made to ensure that states aren't keeping criminal illegals in their jails just so they get money. And if they are receiving money, then they should account for where it is being spent.
I don't think states, alone, should bear the costs incurred for illegals coming into the United States who, thereafter, commit crimes.
It would for Republicans....and DIMs who really want to know what happened with him! He has only gotten away with all of it because he has never actually had to run for his office in Massachusettes. It is always just handed to him.
When I tried to explain Bishop Sheen's show to my kids they convulsed into laughter! Couldn't believe that a show like that could actually have been popular! Oh, for the simpler times!! ;>)
All too often, "engage in dialog" means nothing more than "dueling monologs."
LOL....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.