Posted on 04/18/2006 12:32:01 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
Veteran singer Neil Young has recorded an anti-war protest album on which he reportedly lashes out at George W Bush in a song called Impeach the President.
The Canadian star has described Living with War as "metal folk protest".
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
Gee, what a shock, an aging hippie writing an anti-war song. How cliched.
Must have been all the smack he did in the 60's.
Yes! You've nailed it!
Sung to the tune of "Heart of Gold":
My career is down, it needs a boost
I'll make an album saying I hate George Bush
It worked for Green Day, a nice big pay day
Think I'll find the same new pot of gold, 'cause my schtick's gettin' old
I like some of his stuff. His Buffalo Springfield days particularly were good. Just another one of those artists where I can appreciate some of the music but don't like their politics. There are a bunch of them like that.
On the other hand, there's Ted Nugent: Agree with most of his politics; can't stand his music (except for old stuff he did in The Amboy Dukes).
60's music is one my all-time favorite decades for music; so much great stuff there, even the stuff that has hippy-dippy sentiments to it or are drug-influenced. But that's not to say that I appreciate the hippy outlook on life, or am going to start taking drugs.
Bottom line is I just ignore them when they start talking stuff that I don't agree with. It's not like Neil Young has any major influence on anything anyway, no matter what stance he takes.
neil young is against killing, unless its the unborn. then he is all for it. what a total effin hypocrit.
Go back home to Canada, you boob!
Well, he certainly does blow, that's for sure. (And makes me want to blow chunks!)
Jag
Lynyrd Skynyrd are more talented and patriotic. I think Neil's a Cannuck, but that's no excuse for his idiocy.
Just to put the record straight:
1. Young was writing songs about the damage of drugs from the early 1970s onwards in "Needle and the damage done"
and the entire "Tonight's the Night" album.
2. His political songs go back to the shooting of four students at Kent State in the song "Ohio".
3. He was writing songs about American soldiers returning from war again in the 1970s - "Lookout Joe" - before "the Deer Hunter", "Coming Home" etc.
Is he still alive?
Does he still suck?
Truer words were never written. Kind of like Springsteen, except Bruce sings a tiny bit better. Not much.
Neil Young’s views are, as I have argued, irrelevant to the discussion. First of all, if one examines semioticist rationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject capitalist depatriarchialism or conclude that the raison detre of the singer is significant form, but only if dissent is distinct from narrativity; if that is not the case, we can assume that discourse comes from the collective unconscious. The subject is interpolated into a that includes truth as a totality.
Class is part of the absurdity of consciousness, says Debord. It could be said that the main theme of the works of Young is not, in fact, narrative, but neonarrative. The example of subcultural nihilism which is a central theme of Heart of Gold is also evident in Powderfinger.
The primary theme of la Tourniers analysis of semioticist rationalism is a constructive whole. However, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is not theory, as expressionism suggests, but pretheory. Any number of narratives concerning the role of the artist as poet may be found.
Thus, semioticist rationalism implies that the media is a legal fiction, given that the premise of subcultural nihilism is invalid. Many constructions concerning expressionism exist. (Here’s where Young fits in.)
Therefore, Lyotard uses the term subcultural nihilism to denote a self-fulfilling paradox. Derrida promotes the use of expressionism to attack sexual identity.
Thus, Lacans model of subcultural nihilism suggests that the goal of the participant is deconstruction. Prinn states that the works of Rushdie are an example of mythopoetical capitalism.
However, expressionism implies that truth is capable of significant form, but only if language is equal to art. A number of discourses concerning the role of the observer as poet may be discovered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.