Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troops in Support Of the War
Front Page Magazine ^ | 4-17-06 | Wade Zirkle

Posted on 04/16/2006 11:10:26 PM PDT by smoothsailing

Troops in Support Of the War

By Wade Zirkle

FrontPageMagazine.com | April 17, 2006

Earlier this year there was a town hall meeting on the Iraq war, sponsored by Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.), with the participation of such antiwar organizations as CodePink and MoveOn.org. The event also featured Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), a former Marine who had become an outspoken critic of the war. To this Iraq war veteran, it was a good example of something that's become all too common: People from politics, the media and elsewhere purporting to represent "our" views. With all due respect, most often they don't.

The tenor of the town meeting was mostly what one might expect, but during the question-and-answer period, a veteran injured in Afghanistan stood up to offer his view. "If I didn't have a herniated disc, I would volunteer to go to Iraq in a second with my troops," said Mark Seavey, a former Army sergeant who had recently returned from Afghanistan. "I know you keep saying how you have talked to the troops and the troops are demoralized, and I really resent that characterization. The morale of the troops I talk to is phenomenal, which is why my troops are volunteering to go back despite the hardships. . . ."

"And, Congressman Moran, 200 of your constituents just arrived back from Afghanistan -- we never got a letter, we never got a visit from you, you didn't come to our homecoming. The only thing we got was a letter from the governor of this state thanking us for our service in Iraq, when we were in Afghanistan. That's reprehensible. I don't know who you two are talking to, but the morale of the troops is very high."

What was the response? Murtha said nothing, while Moran attempted to move on, no pun intended, stating: "That wasn't in the form of a question, it was a statement."

It was indeed a statement; a statement from both a constituent and a veteran that should have elicited something more than silence or a dismissive comment highlighting a supposed breach of protocol. This exchange, captured on video (it was on C-SPAN), has since been forwarded from base to base in military circles. It has not been well received there, and it only raises the already high level of frustration among military personnel that their opinions are not being heard.

In view of his distinguished military career, John Murtha has been the subject of much attention from the media and is a sought-after spokesman for opponents of the Iraq war. He has earned the right to speak. But his comments supposedly expressing the negative views of those who have and are now serving in the Middle East run counter to what I and others know and hear from our own colleagues -- from junior officers to the enlisted backbone of our fighting force.

Murtha undoubtedly knows full well that the greatest single thing that drags on morale in war is the loss of a buddy. But second to that is politicians questioning, in amplified tones, the validity of that loss to our families, colleagues, the nation and the world.

While we don't question his motives, we do question his assumptions. When he called for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, there was a sense of respectful disagreement among most military personnel. But when he subsequently stated that he would not join today's military, he made clear to the majority of us that he is out of touch with the troops. Quite frankly, it was received as a slap in the face.

Like so many others past and present, I proudly volunteered to serve in the military. I served one tour in Iraq and then volunteered to go back. Veterans continue to make clear that they are determined to succeed in Iraq. They are making this clear the best way they can: by volunteering to go back for third and sometimes fourth deployments. This fact is backed up by official Pentagon recruitment reports released as recently as Monday.

The morale of the trigger-pulling class of today's fighting force is strong. Unfortunately, we have not had a microphone or media audience willing to report our comments. Despite this frustration, our military continues to proudly dedicate itself to the mission at hand: a free, democratic and stable Iraq and a more secure America. All citizens have a right to express their views on this important national challenge, and all should be heard. Veterans ask no more, and they deserve no less.

The writer is executive director of Vets for Freedom. He served two tours in Iraq with the Marines before being wounded in action.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: markseavey; zirkle
"My opponent [Murtha] has become the national spokesperson for the anti-democracy movement in Iraq, a position and opinion that lies in sharp contrast to most of us in the district he was elected to represent."

"Withdrawal right now would be devastating to the United States of America. We have to stand for our beliefs, we have to be committed to win this war on terror. Anything short of that will cause America great harm."

Diana Irey--March 22,2006

(Note to all: I'm off to bed, just wanted to get this up for the morning crew who might have missed it)

1 posted on 04/16/2006 11:10:27 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freema
*Ping*
2 posted on 04/16/2006 11:11:59 PM PDT by smoothsailing (NEVER FORGET-Don't be Murtha'd again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

[But when he subsequently stated that he would not join today's military, he made clear to the majority of us that he is out of touch with the troops.]

Murtha is not only out of touch with the troops but he crossed a very profound line. How dare he say he speaks for our military when he says he would not join to serve along side the thousands of brave men and women now serving.


3 posted on 04/16/2006 11:42:34 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

You give Murtha too much credit. He has burned any bridges he may have ever had. The idea that he would visit soldiers at Walter Reed after publically saying, in so many words, that their sacrifices are worthless is beyond credibilty. He doesnt have the nads to face soldiers and Marines who have answered the call and come home either unhurt or otherwise. When he did at that town hall meeting, he sat mute and stone silent, words escaping his feeble mind.

I have nothing but contempt for him, utter disdain, total disgust that he would act as a shill and puppet for the likes of Cindy Sheehan, the modern Jane Fonda.


4 posted on 04/17/2006 4:27:58 AM PDT by armydawg1 (" America must win this war..." PVT Martin Treptow, KIA, WW1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armydawg1

What can we expect from a man who has a (D) after their name.

However we do expect those that served to respect their fellow Marines!


5 posted on 04/17/2006 6:13:31 AM PDT by stopem (America is not a Cash Cow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

I am in support of the war. BTDT!


6 posted on 04/17/2006 7:03:05 AM PDT by Kewlhand`tek (Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson