Skip to comments.
Life in the Green Lane (hybrids)
NY Times ^
| April 16, 2006
| JAMIE LINCOLN KITMAN
Posted on 04/16/2006 10:16:07 PM PDT by neverdem
IF you make your way over to the Javits Convention Center for the New York International Automobile Show or if you've gone to any auto show in the last year or so you'll know that hybrid cars are the hippest automotive fashion statement to come along in years. They've become synonymous with the worthy goal of reducing gasoline consumption and dependence on foreign oil and all that this means for a better environment and more stable geopolitics.
And yet like fat-free desserts, which sound healthy but can still make you fat, the hybrid car can make people feel as if they're doing something good, even when they're doing nothing special at all. As consumers and governments at every level climb onto the hybrid bandwagon, there is the very real danger of elevating the technology at the expense of the intended outcome saving gas.
Few things these days say "environmentally aware consumer" so loudly as the fuel-sipping Toyota Prius. With its two power sources one a gasoline-powered internal combustion engine, the other a battery-driven electric motor the best-selling Prius (and other hybrids sold by Honda and Ford and due soon from several other car makers) can go further on a gallon and emit fewer pollutants in around-town use than most conventional automobiles because under certain circumstances they run on battery power and consume less fuel. For this reason, federal, state and local governments have been bending over backward to encourage the sale of hybrids, with a bewildering array of tax breaks, traffic lanes and parking spaces dedicated to hybrid owners.
But just because a car has so-called hybrid technology doesn't mean it's doing more to help the environment or to reduce the country's dependence on imported oil any more than a nonhybrid car. The truth is...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: automobiles; bike; electric; electricvehicles; electricyouth; energy; engineering; engines; environment; gasoline; greens; hooligan; hooliganmc; hooligans; hooligansmc; hybridengines; hybrids; jamielincolnkitman; kitman; mc; motorcycle; motorcycles; oil; petroleum; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
04/16/2006 10:16:12 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I was talking to physicist in California who told me there is a major problem with the way people are using hybrids - that they are using the brakes rather than letting the energy be reabsorbed and stored and that, he said defeats the whole purpose.
2
posted on
04/16/2006 10:20:28 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: neverdem
To: gondramB
The real reason people buy them is not the mileage, its access to the carpool lanes and thereby save commute time. Many studies have shown, that in the long run the current hybrids cost more per mile to use.
4
posted on
04/16/2006 10:26:48 PM PDT
by
Starwolf
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: gondramB
If you wanna save on gas $$$, there are plenty of ways to do so starting with:
1. Purchase a simple compact car with manual transmission.
2. Drive the speed limit at a steady rate, and refrain from going over 65 MPH on the interstate.
3. Clean your fuel system regularly, and get brakes and tire pressure to standard.
4. Carpool if possible, and take turns with your driving shifts.
5. Ask yourself before leaving the house, "Is this trip (to the store, movie theater, office etc.) REALLY necessary?"
You don't need a hybrid to save money, just a little bit of discipline with maintenance and driving habits.
6
posted on
04/16/2006 10:30:16 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
To: Starwolf
Absolutely.
A car is a complicated machine already.
A Hybrid is a complicated machine on steroids.
7
posted on
04/16/2006 10:33:12 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
To: Emmet Fitzhume
A better option, perhaps, would be to buy a motorcycle.
Then you can stomp all but the fastest cars, use the HOV lane, and still get better gas mileage than even the most economically driven hybrid.
8
posted on
04/16/2006 10:34:37 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Emmet Fitzhume
"
You don't need a hybrid to save money, just a little bit of discipline with maintenance and driving habits."
Hybrids have some built in disadvantages - like carrying around all those batteries and the extra heavy metals and energy used in construction.... but in principle I like the idea of recapturing my breaking energy. But I'm not gonna buy a new car to do that. I buy only used cars and save more energy by them not having to manufacture a new car than I would in the life of a hybrid.
9
posted on
04/16/2006 10:35:54 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: Spktyr
Not so sure about the mileage part. I have a liter bike and I run in the low 40s unless I decide I need to get some place in a hurry ;-)
10
posted on
04/16/2006 10:37:26 PM PDT
by
Starwolf
To: Emmet Fitzhume
Yeah, people always want a more fuel efficient vehicle, but what they don't due is proper maintenance to their existing car. I ask "When was the last time you changed your fuel filter, air filter, pcv valve? Are you over a 100k miles? Then change your plugs and wires". Amazing how a mature or older car can run like new and get a drastic improvement in mpg.
To: Spktyr
Absolutely.
Problem is that Louisiana roads are a motorcyclist's worst nightmare.
I will get a motorcycle once I move outta here, though!
Good advice!
12
posted on
04/16/2006 10:37:57 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
To: Starwolf
No need to worry. Hybrids in the real world seem to get 30-40mpg. Your liter bike should edge them nicely.
13
posted on
04/16/2006 10:39:51 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Emmet Fitzhume
"Absolutely.
Problem is that Louisiana roads are a motorcyclist's worst nightmare. "
Not just Louisiana - I have a cousin who lost his testicles when he hit a armadillo with his motorcycle. I'm sure the armadillo wasn't happy either.
14
posted on
04/16/2006 10:39:58 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: gondramB
Ouch.
My Uncle Allen calls them "donorcycles."
Your unfortunate cousin presents a convincing case.
15
posted on
04/16/2006 10:41:44 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
Gonna keep repeating on these threads again and again:
We have the technology and capability to use surf-powered generators to seperate hydrogen from water, store the hydrogen and use it to fuel our vehicles. It would run just like the propane-powered cars do. We can do this RIGHT NOW! EVERY single enemy of America would implode immediately if we did this. WHY AREN'T WE AT LEAST TRYING?!?!
(I wonder if I can rig this into the biggest Lincoln I could find and drive it up to Boulder. Think the treehugging smelly hippie freakshows would have second thoughts about their hatred for American technology?
Probably not.)
16
posted on
04/16/2006 10:41:44 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: Emmet Fitzhume
As opposed to being roasted to a cinder when that 600V battery pack shorts out through the shattered chassis - and you.
The chances of being seriously injured when an accident happens is greater on a bike than in a small car - but, oddly enough, your chances of *surviving* a severe accident is better if you ride a bike than if you drive a small car (they don't have to cut you out of the wreckage - it's a scoop and run job).
Been there, done that, got the T-shirt and my shattered helmet still hangs on the wall - but I'm still here.
17
posted on
04/16/2006 10:45:21 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
Well rock on!
Just be careful on the road!!!
18
posted on
04/16/2006 10:46:40 PM PDT
by
Emmet Fitzhume
("Shining with brightness, Always on surveillance.")
To: Spktyr
And die.
19
posted on
04/16/2006 10:48:56 PM PDT
by
Fielding
(Sans Dieu Rien)
To: neverdem
I'm surprised this was published in the
New York Times. The gist of the article is if you must have a hybrid car, keep it for in town use like you would with an electric car and use a conventional gas or diesel powered car on the highway. Most people would want to keep the hybrid car for every day excursions in the local area and save their gas or diesel engine car for the open road.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
20
posted on
04/16/2006 10:51:26 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson