Posted on 04/16/2006 5:08:19 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, April 16th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Mark Everson.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Joan Chittister, executive director, Center for Contemporary Spirituality; Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, Tikkun Magazine; Jon Meacham, managing editor, Newsweek; Seyyed Hossein Nasr, professor of Islamic studies, George Washington University; Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor, First Things; Joel Osteen, senior pastor, Lakewood Church.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. George Allen, R-Va.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Evan Bayh, D-Ind.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Samir Sumaidaie, Iraqi ambassador to the U.S. ; Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; former Secretary of State Kissinger; retired Army Brig. Gen. David Grange; Rev. Jerry Falwell..
Thanks P.
I agree!
They are also void of basic values let alone self-serving and have no appreciation for not recking lives for their own pleasure....
pathetic...
We should enforce the law, on the border and yes at the work place.
That said, illegal immigration has been going on for a long time. Newt has been in Washington for a long time. Only now does he talk about illegal immigration.
Does anybody have that picture of Newt with Hillary, wearing a kiss-a*s smile.
LOL!!!
I LIKE IT!!
;-0
ROFLLLL!!!
yes- throw Johnnie's blond and brunette groupies in the mix and we have a full scale scandal!
;-)
Spiritual lineage. Read Paul on marriage and serving God.
"The Young and the Restless Freepers"
Well said.
LOL!
Given the relative value in the Jewish culture (or virtually any culture) of the time I think that one is pretty straightforward. A son was of great value and for God to give us His Son would be instantly recognized as a big deal. The fact that he still forgives us after the way we treated His Son is a REALLY big deal.
In the context of that culture a Daughter of God would have been greeted with "gee, thanks a whole bunch. So what's Your point?"
Here's one of many threads on the hypocracy.
I choose to read II Timothy instead when it comes to questioning on church structure.
The Father sent His Son to earth for two reasons:
1. To defeat death - celebrated today in the West - next week in the East.
2. To establish the Church - celebrated in 50 (57) days at the Feast of Pentecost.
There was no Bible for hundreds of years after the Resurrection. 327, I'm thinking is when the canon of Scripture was established.
So for those centuries, Christians were worshipping and evangelizing without the same Bible we have today. They were operating on what had been orally communicated plus the OT Scripture and gospels, both legit and spurious.
Klein recounts that at the 2004 Democratic Convention, Heinz Kerry tried to prevent vice presidential candidate John Edwards from joining her husband onstage before she did, insisting, "I am the spouse. I go first." Unable to reason with the woman, Klein writes, a young aide waited until the end of Kerry's speech then "blocked Teresa with both arms, turned his head, and yelled to Edwards — 'Run!'"
ROFLLL!!!
bet JFKook got an EARFUL that night!
(BIG GRIN!)
There is not a speck of evidence for that Juan,
Juan crawls under the table and sucks his thumb.
Britt liked it so much he just spanked Mara as well.
Kristol thinks sec.def is just wrong. What an idiot.
Juan takes over Chris's job one last point
There was no Catholic Church at the day of Penecost.
And to believe there was no written word of God is in direct dispute with the Book of John.
I'm gonna stop here.
I am glad you referenced the fact that illegal immigration has been going on for a long time.
I have been wondering why, on all of these threads that have been SO angry about what Bush hasn't done, re: the laws already on the book on immigration, I don't see any of the freepers, or the MSM, politicians, pundits explain WHY ex-Pres Reagan, and ex-Pres Clinton isn't getting at least as much of the blame, if not more, than President Bush???
Reagan was in office for a few years after he signed the Amnesty Bill that required the employers that hire illegals to be punished...had that HAPPENED, do you think we would be where we are right now?? Why wasn't it implemented right away?
Also, had Clinton followed the law, and required the businesses to be punished, would we be where we are now?
I am not saying that Bush is blameless...but, please, someone explain to me why HE is being called the boogey-man in all of this??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.