Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Heroin Hospitalizes 7 In Chicago
WFRV.COM ^ | 04-15-2006 | CBS

Posted on 04/15/2006 4:09:33 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: robertpaulsen

Yup. Right on. Plus look at drug legalization realistically. We legalize drugs and the lawyers will start suing the manufacturers and distributors on the first day. It's like tobacco squared. Heroin will be so expensive from taxes and liability insurance, people will have to buy it off the black market. Which is illegal.

Clue Fairy, in for a visit.


61 posted on 04/20/2006 7:06:38 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

If you think "we the people" decide anything anymore, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Talk about naive. Our government is nothing more than a benign tyrant. We have precious little effect on what goes on.


62 posted on 04/20/2006 8:17:03 AM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; winston2
winston2:

"and personally, I think it un-Constitutional to jail someone for a matter that is not presenting a threat to the rights of another citizen."

Nothing to "think" about that; it's a fact, under due process of law. [see the 14th]

Paulsen equivocates:

Define "presenting a threat".

Committing an actual criminal act.

Personally, I think recreational drug use is a threat to our society, to our way of life, and to the raising of our children.

Yes, you do 'think' a lot of odd things bobby. Like hillary, you want a war to 'save the children'. -- That WOD's is tearing our Constitutional society apart.

63 posted on 04/20/2006 8:31:09 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
"If you think "we the people" decide anything anymore, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you."

Golly gosh, what's driving the current illegal immigration controversy -- polititians finally discovered their collective conscience?

If you're not writing your congressman on this issue, you should be. If you have already, then your post is ludicrous.

64 posted on 04/20/2006 9:08:27 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"Committing an actual criminal act."

Oh. Like speeding? Or DUI? Those criminal acts?

65 posted on 04/20/2006 9:10:50 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"He took some of it; some of the free stuff, and he fell out," Singleton said. "(He) came in the house and he just fell out. We called the ambulance and they asked what was going on. He took some free heroin, fell out, (we) called the ambulance."

Well. That cleared that up...

66 posted on 04/20/2006 9:13:04 AM PDT by null and void (America: It's too late to work within the system, but it's too early to start shooting the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
winston2:

"and personally, I think it un-Constitutional to jail someone for a matter that is not presenting a threat to the rights of another citizen."

Nothing to "think" about that; it's a fact, under due process of law. [see the 14th]

Paulsen equivocates:

Define "presenting a threat".

Committing an actual criminal act.

Oh. Like speeding? Or DUI? Those criminal acts?

There you go again bobbie, claiming that reasonable regulations about driving are comparable to a prohibitional 'war' on human liberty/rights.

Personally, I think recreational drug use is a threat to our society, to our way of life, and to the raising of our children.

Yes, you do 'think' a lot of odd things bobby. Like hillary, you want a war to 'save the children'. -- That WOD's is tearing our Constitutional society apart.

67 posted on 04/20/2006 9:26:43 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"There you go again bobbie, claiming that reasonable regulations about driving are comparable to a prohibitional 'war' on human liberty/rights."

We have reasonable regulations on drugs. Of the tens of thousands of drugs, only a handful are prohibited.

68 posted on 04/20/2006 9:43:58 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Paulsen impersonating Hillary:

Personally, I think recreational drug use is a threat to our society, to our way of life, and to the raising of our children.

AppyPappy, ditto king:

Yup. Right on. Plus look at drug legalization realistically. We legalize drugs and the lawyers will start suing the manufacturers and distributors on the first day. It's like tobacco squared. Heroin will be so expensive from taxes and liability insurance, people will have to buy it off the black market. Which is illegal.

Bizarre. -- If we repeal drug prohibitions, and restore constitutional law, there will be no black market, nor any basis for idiotic lawsuits.

Clue Fairy, in for a visit.

Clue in chicken little - crying that the sky would fall if we returned to the legal world circa 1900.

69 posted on 04/20/2006 9:46:58 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
There you go again bobbie, claiming that reasonable regulations about driving are comparable to a prohibitional 'war' on human liberty/rights.

"-- We have reasonable regulations on drugs. Of the tens of thousands of drugs, only a handful are prohibited. --"

Another bold howler..

Get your head out of the sand paulsen; this 'prohibition on some drugs' is destroying our constitutional way of life.

70 posted on 04/20/2006 9:53:48 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"Get your head out of the sand paulsen; this 'prohibition on some drugs' is destroying our constitutional way of life."

Be that as it may, the regulations are reasonable. That, may I remind you, was the issue.

71 posted on 04/20/2006 9:57:59 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
If we repeal drug prohibitions, and restore constitutional law

Constitutional law. You are a real hoot. And maybe all the lawyers will turn honest too. Jeepers, what a great idea!

When the politicians aren't selling the Constitution, they are wiping their ass with it. I'm not counting on a return to the Constitution anytime soon. But, tp, if you can make it happen, I'll support drug legalization. Until then, it is simply unrealistic.

72 posted on 04/20/2006 9:59:18 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
There you go again bobbie, claiming that reasonable regulations about driving are comparable to a prohibitional 'war' on human liberty/rights.

"-- We have reasonable regulations on drugs. Of the tens of thousands of drugs, only a handful are prohibited. --"

Another bold howler..

Get your head out of the sand paulsen; this 'prohibition on some drugs' is destroying our constitutional way of life.

Be that as it may, the regulations are reasonable. [Neener neener] That, may I remind you, was the issue.

Unconstitutional prohibitions, may I remind you, have always been the issue.

73 posted on 04/20/2006 10:12:48 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Yeah, legalize that crap!

When alcohol was illegal, many died of poisoning from improperly made illegal alcohol. Once it has been legalized, the production of an intoxicating substance can be standardized and regulated.
74 posted on 04/20/2006 10:16:05 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Bizarre. -- If we repeal drug prohibitions, and restore constitutional law, there will be no black market, nor any basis for idiotic lawsuits.

Clue Fairy, in for a visit.

Clue in chicken little - crying that the sky would fall if we returned to the legal world circa 1900.

Constitutional law. You are a real hoot.

Well, at least I'm not clucking around like some chicken little.

And maybe all the lawyers will turn honest too. Jeepers, what a great idea! When the politicians aren't selling the Constitution, they are wiping their ass with it.

Yet you applaud them using it that way for the drug war. -- "Jeepers".

I'm not counting on a return to the Constitution anytime soon. But, tp, if you can make it happen, I'll support drug legalization. Until then, it is simply unrealistic.

Whatever, appyhead.

75 posted on 04/20/2006 10:20:33 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Appyhead. Whoowee, that was a real knee-slapper. You should be working the Poconos with Shecky and the gang.


76 posted on 04/20/2006 10:26:53 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger

"Think of it as evolution in action."
-- L. Niven, J. Pournelle


77 posted on 04/20/2006 10:27:27 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (When Al Franken had his bris, they threw away the baby and saved the foreskin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

It worked.


78 posted on 04/20/2006 10:45:28 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

So you're conceding the regulations ARE reasonable, just unconstitutional.


79 posted on 04/20/2006 10:54:24 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Paulsen:

"-- We have reasonable regulations on drugs. Of the tens of thousands of drugs, only a handful are prohibited. --"

Another bold howler..
Get your head out of the sand paulsen; this 'prohibition on some drugs' is destroying our constitutional way of life.

Be that as it may, the regulations are reasonable. [Neener neener] That, may I remind you, was the issue.

Unconstitutional prohibitions, may I remind you, have always been the issue.

So you're conceding the regulations ARE reasonable, just unconstitutional.

Bobbie, you make very odd comments ALL the time. What above gives you the idea I'm "conceding" anything? -- And how could an unconstitutional regulation be 'reasonable'? -- Get a grip on your rhetoric.

80 posted on 04/20/2006 11:29:16 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson