Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush rebuffs attack on Rumsfeld ~... "full support" in the wake of criticism by retired generals.
BBC ^ | Friday, 14 April 2006, 22:05 GMT 23:05 UK | staff

Posted on 04/14/2006 5:09:29 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bush rebuffs attack on Rumsfeld

Donald Rumsfeld

Rumsfeld has been accused of ignoring advice from commanders

US President George W Bush has assured Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld of his "full support" in the wake of criticism by retired generals.

In a statement, the president rejected calls for Mr Rumsfeld to step down.

Mr Bush praised Mr Rumsfeld for his "energetic and steady leadership" during his years at the Pentagon.

Six retired generals have spoken out against Mr Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and apparent disdain for experienced military commanders.

The defence secretary has also personally dismissed suggestions that he should resign.

"Out of thousands and thousands of admirals and generals, if every time two or three people disagreed we changed the secretary of defence of the United States it would be like a merry-go-round," he told Arabic TV channel al-Arabiya.

Secretary Rumsfeld's energetic and steady leadership is exactly what is needed at this critical period

US President George W Bush

But he did admit to regrets over the abuse of prisoners by US troops at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib jail.

He offered his resignation during the 2004 furore over Abu Ghraib, but Mr Bush refused to accept it.

Strong backing

In his statement, Mr Bush dismissed claims that the defence secretary has not worked well with senior commanders.

CRITICAL RETIRED GENERALS

Maj Gen Charles H Swannack Jr, Army

Maj Gen John Riggs, Army

Maj Gen John Batiste, Army

Gen Anthony Zinni, Marines

Lt Gen Gregory Newbold, Marines

Maj Gen Paul Eaton, Army

"I have seen first-hand how Don relies upon our military commanders in the field and at the Pentagon to make decisions about how best to complete these missions," Mr Bush said.

"Secretary Rumsfeld's energetic and steady leadership is exactly what is needed at this critical period," he added.

"He has my full support and deepest appreciation."

The president stressed that under Mr Rumsfeld's guidance the US military has undergone a period of rapid transformation and faced a series of major overseas conflicts.

"That kind of change is hard, but our nation must have a military that is fully prepared to confront the dangerous threats of the 21st century."

The BBC's Jane Little in Washington says it is highly unusual for Mr Bush to issue a statement from his Camp David retreat, where he is on holiday - but pressure is mounting on Mr Rumsfeld and the administration.

Divided opinion

Mr Bush's unequivocal backing for Mr Rumsfeld came amid growing discontent among recently-retired senior officers.

The two most senior generals to voice their unease were Maj Gen John Riggs and Maj Gen Charles H Swannack Jr, both of the Army.

Donald Rumsfeld visiting troops in Iraq, December 2005
Mr Rumsfeld twice offered to resign over the Abu Ghraib scandal

In a radio interview Gen Riggs, a former division commander, said Mr Rumsfeld fostered an atmosphere of "arrogance" among the Pentagon's top civilian leadership.

"They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda. I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign," he told National Public Radio (NPR).

Retired Marine Gen Anthony Zinni told CNN Mr Rumsfeld should be held responsible for a series of mistakes, beginning with "throwing away 10 years worth of planning, plans that had taken into account what we would face in an occupation of Iraq".

But others have come out in support of the embattled defence secretary.

Retired Marine Lt Gen Mike DeLong, who was deputy commander of Central Command as the US military prepared to invade Iraq in March 2003, said Mr Rumsfeld was good at his job.




TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush43; dod; iraq; praise; rumsfeld; secdef; secretaryofwot; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2006 5:09:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Nice that the bbc sticks it's nose into things it can't understand.


2 posted on 04/14/2006 5:11:08 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This just the next sequence of the Bush Bashing that the left adopted in December 2000. Retired Generals, the Plame Game, Body Armor, tax cuts for the rich, Katrina, Cindy Sheehan...........


3 posted on 04/14/2006 5:12:06 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mckinney in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda.

Yes. Thats right. Exactly.

They get to wear the suits and ties, and you get to carry out their "agenda", also known as "national policy".

4 posted on 04/14/2006 5:16:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

And one can now see why these cry baby idiots are shooting off their dumb, stupid mouths. The Army ones never got promoted so they are mad at the Sec of Defense. They should resign their commissions and give back their retired pay ASAP. They are proved to be anti-American scum. Thank goodness I never had to serve with these idiots during my 25 years.


5 posted on 04/14/2006 5:17:07 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Donald Rumsfeld is a target of the MSM because he tells them when their questions are stupid.


6 posted on 04/14/2006 5:17:15 PM PDT by rocksblues (Illegal Immigrant racist here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

And most just ho hum at these pathetic english majors undergrads. The only ones who read this trash is us, and the prof who kudos it. My ug papers could run circles around this crap.


7 posted on 04/14/2006 5:17:23 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance; All
Foxnews Special Report had Retired Chief of Staff on and he supports Rumsfeld and the Rountable had a good discussion, Barnes and krauthammer educated Juan, Brit would have been proud.

****************************

From Powerline:

Those griping ex-generals

*********************************AN EXCERPT ***********************************

Dafydd ab Hugh has an excellent post about the retired generals who have lambasted Defense Secretary Rumsfeld recently. Dafydd notes that the generals in question are (1) mostly, in effect, Clinton appointees and (2) "old school" generals who object to Rumsfeld's pet theories of pushing towards smaller units, more unit independence, much greater reliance on Special Forces, and a reorganization of units to be self-sufficient rather than specialized. As to the second point, Dafydd compares the griping generals to "vice presidents at General Motors or IBM who furiously denounce splitting those companies into self-reliant business units instead of the normal corporate divisions they've had for twenty years." He also notes that "the fact that an old general dislikes the new style of warfare is not a refutation of that style. It just [the general] is 'Old School.' But Old School is not necessary the best school." You should definitely read the whole thing.

8 posted on 04/14/2006 5:31:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Is anyone here aware of the fact that there are THOUSANDS of retired Generals?

I believe that we have over 800 active at any one time.

A scattered few retirees piping off is a great endorsement of Rumsfield
9 posted on 04/14/2006 5:33:14 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for the link!


10 posted on 04/14/2006 5:35:00 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Today, Rush read from a another's Generals statement rebutting most of what these Generals were saying. I didnt realize that Zinni was another Clarke..


11 posted on 04/14/2006 5:36:09 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mckinney in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gen. Riggs: "They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda. I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign," he told National Public Radio (NPR).

Oh, well, yeah, if he said it on NPR it must be true. NOT!

12 posted on 04/14/2006 5:37:08 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Rush also talked about the fact that all these generals were in on the review session in 2003, was this a good plan or not, speak up now. Well, they didn't. And the plan went forward. Now, someone's selling a book, and trying to generate interest. Pathetic bunch of losers. I'd rather have sargeants run the army instead of generals. At least sargeants know what's what.


13 posted on 04/14/2006 5:43:18 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I had found and then lost a killer article about how even Clinton was butting heads against the stuffed shirt generals that hadn't a clue how to fight a non conventional enemy. An enemy without uniforms that didn't fight in a battlefield.

I agree that the Pentagon has been dragged kicking and screaming into 21st century reality by Rumsfeld and they resent him very much for being smarter than they are.

If anyone could point me to the article again, I'd be most grateful.


14 posted on 04/14/2006 5:44:55 PM PDT by listenhillary (The original Contract with America - The U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Mr Rumsfeld should be held responsible for a series of mistakes, beginning with "throwing away 10 years worth of planning, plans that had taken into account what we would face in an occupation of Iraq".

10 years worth of worthless, do nothing but sit around eating pizza with the Pres on the Oval Office rug?

10 years when Clintooon tore apart the military, dismantled it to near extinction, pilots having to rob other planes for parts to keep a small portion of a squadron flying, caused the moral to be at all time low, with troops opting out at an unprecedented rate - promoting like minded (think Clintooon and Kerrrrry) military up the ladder - (They NEEDED to be weeded! er retired)

Why don't these armchair generals STFU...They wanted to fight at 21st cent war with 19th cent weapons and tactics -

GO AWAY

15 posted on 04/14/2006 5:49:31 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Yup. It's hilarious, really. It's like they have a big wheel divided into sections: ABU GHRAIB; RUMSFELD MUST GO; CHENEY MUST GO; BUSH MUST GO; CONDI MUST GO; POLL NUMBERS DOWN; CINDY SHEEHAN; JOHN MURTHA; QUAGMIRE, and a dozen more. And when one fizzles (usually for the third or fourth time), they spin the wheel again and pick another. Election 2004 was the classic. They had everybody resigning or close to resigning, according to their usual anonymous sources "close to the White House." Of course, it's always just Democrat/Liberal wishful thinking, filtered through the MSM. And they're stupid enough to think Americans aren't on to their game.
16 posted on 04/14/2006 5:51:30 PM PDT by JennysCool (Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Report (from another thread):

General Tommy Franks cleaned Hissy's clock on Hairball. Too bad it's not repeated on Friday. Hope one of the blogs captured the exchange.


17 posted on 04/14/2006 5:54:34 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
In the Department of Defense there are:

34 - four star generals/admirals

124 - three star generals/admirals

278 - two star generals/admirals

439 - one star generals/admirals

Throw in the U.S. Coast Guard and you have 900 generals and admirals on active duty today. Roughly 15-20% of these retire each year.

Also interesting to note: The current number of flag grade (generals and admirals) billets, for a military of 1,400,000, is basically the same that we grew to during WWII, with a military of 12,000,000.

18 posted on 04/14/2006 5:57:07 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Most of these Generals were in favor of a slow march that would have taken 6-9 months just to get to Baghdad, and anticipated 5-10000 dead - before an occupation even started. They were shown to have been wrong about us needing multiples more troops just to do the invasion.

This is like how Joe Wilson originally argued that we shouldn't invade Iraq because the WMDs Iraq had would make our losses during an invasion too great, and then afterwards arguing that we shouldn't have invaded because there were no WMDs.

19 posted on 04/14/2006 5:58:24 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Thanks. It seems we might be a bit heavy in the brass.


20 posted on 04/14/2006 6:03:16 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson