Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fossil Find Is Missing Link in Human Evolution, Scientists Say
National Geographic News ^ | April 13, 2006 | John Roach

Posted on 04/13/2006 12:18:35 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow

When the famous skeleton of an early human ancestor known as Lucy was discovered in Africa in the 1970s, scientists asked: Where did she come from?

Now, fossils found in the same region are providing solid answers, researchers have announced.

Lucy is a 3.5-foot-tall (1.1-meter-tall) adult skeleton that belongs to an early human ancestor, or hominid, known as Australopithecus afarensis.

The species lived between 3 million and 3.6 million years ago and is widely considered an ancestor of modern humans.

The new fossils are from the most primitive species of Australopithecus, known as Australopithecus anamensis. The remains date to about 4.1 million years ago, according to Tim White, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley.

White co-directed the team that discovered the new fossils in Ethiopia (map) in a region of the Afar desert known as the Middle Awash.

The team says the newly discovered fossils are a no-longer-missing link between early and later forms of Australopithecus and to a more primitive hominid known as Ardipithecus.

"What the new discovery does is very nicely fill this gap between the earliest of the Lucy species at 3.6 million years and the older [human ancestor] Ardipithecus ramidus, which is dated at 4.4 million years," White said.

The new fossil find consists mainly of jawbone fragments, upper and lower teeth, and a thigh bone.

The fossils are described in today's issue of the journal Nature.

Found Links

According to White, the discovery supports the hypothesis that Lucy was a direct descendent of Australopithecus anamensis.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ardipithecusramidus; crevo; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 681-684 next last
To: Conservative Texan Mom
(Interpretation: Hairless and dark pigmented body (based on environment, limb proportions)

How do limb proportions provide clues to pigmentation and hairiness? I understand the environment part, but the inclusion of limb proportions I don't.

I am not positive on this one.

Limb proportions can determine whether the individual was arboreal or terrestrial, and this leads to an estimate of whether, and how much, the individual lived within a relatively dense tree canopy vs. the more open grasslands. If the latter, the individual would likely be more exposed to sunlight, requiring a better cooling system (i.e., less hair), but at the same time there would be more exposure to ultraviolet light, requiring darker pigmentation.

421 posted on 04/14/2006 2:32:49 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Interim tagline: The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

I got it. If the limb proportions most likely indicate he was terrestrial. From this they conclude hairless, and dark pigmented. Do those two features pretty much go hand in hand? At least in the environment this fossil was found?


422 posted on 04/14/2006 2:39:57 PM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Texan Mom
When based on these things, a very well thought, reasoned, and rational argument can be made for their existence.

The site in question appears to be an objectivist site. It makes unwarranted assumptions about the tangible existence and ubiquitous power of axiomatic ideas in formal logic.

While it is possible that entities for which no certain objective evidence of any great power exist, I think you oversell the extent to which reasoning and rationality support their existence. Reasoning that only works while preaching to the choir, isn't the sort of reasoning science is organized to address.

423 posted on 04/14/2006 2:45:42 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Texan Mom
I got it. If the limb proportions most likely indicate he was terrestrial. From this they conclude hairless, and dark pigmented. Do those two features pretty much go hand in hand? At least in the environment this fossil was found?

Sort of. There are variations though. The Bushmen have a slightly different adaptation, with thicker skin contributing to protection from UV light, while some true forest groups (Pygmies) do have dark skin.

Like some of the recreations on Discovery channel, the amount of hair and exact color of skin here may be "best guess" estimates. The limb proportions are a more accurate estimate of the locomotion (along with shape of the hands and feet, etc.).

424 posted on 04/14/2006 2:49:12 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Interim tagline: The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
I mean, pixie-bashing on these threads is really upsetting.

I agree.
Besides, bashing pixies leaves a rather greasy stain on the walls.

425 posted on 04/14/2006 2:59:22 PM PDT by dread78645 (Evolution. A dying theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Texan Mom

Actually, for my age, I have very few wrinkles...I think its genetic...both of my parents had very few wrinkles, and never used any sort of skin cream of anything like that...in fact, my dad, never ever had a grey hair on his head...he found a long white hair when he was in his 30s but that was it...he died almost 70, with a full head of almost black hair, and almost no wrinkles...mom had greyed, but had few wrinkles...I maintain, a lot of how one ages, is a genetic thing...

Now my hubby is very young looking for his age...hes going to be 63, and almost everyone thinks he is only in his mid 40s...but again, his whole family is like that..his grandmother died, in her 90s with a full head of hair, down to her waist, and almost no grey...his aunt died in her 80s, with no wrinkles and no grey hair...his dad died with black hair, and almost no wrinkles...his last surviving uncle is in his 80s and just returned from a vigorous jaunt to Egypt, and altho he has some grey hair, almost no wrinkles...people mistake him for someone in their early 60s...I think its all that hot Sicilian blood..

My younger son, says, he will look forever young, judging by his genetics on both sides...


426 posted on 04/14/2006 3:14:22 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
Can I borrow some of your families genetics.
My husband says I don't look any different than I did in my twenties (I'm sure he means late twenties, or he's lying), but I don't know. I'm not sure what 35 is supposed to look like. I just figure it's a good time to start some preventative maintenance.
I agree about the genetics thing. My mother never had stretch marks, and neither do I, after three babies. I have noticed the metabolism thing slowing down the last year or so. I've always been a little person. I kind of got used to 110 pounds, no matter what. If I ate five banana splits, which I didn't, but you know what I mean, I'd still weigh 110 pounds. Then, after my 34th birthday I started noticing my clothes fit a little snugger. Stepped on the scale, 110 pounds. It turned out the stupid scale was broken. I had gained about five pounds. Glad I caught it when I did! I'm maintaining my weight, but it's not easy like it used to be. I miss potato chips.
427 posted on 04/14/2006 9:02:19 PM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Texan Mom

Ah, I do have stretch marks....but I figure, I earned them in the line of duty....luckily I had very easy labors and births with both my boys, so the stretch mark thing did not really bother me a lot...

Yep, as we begin to age, our metabolism slows down, I had to give in and get glasses, and sometimes I will forget little things, tho for just a short while...however, I have maintained my excellent hearing...my younger son always called it my 'mother hearing'...no matter how quiet my boys tried to be, while plotting their little schemes, I could always hear them just fine...and they hated that...


428 posted on 04/14/2006 9:08:38 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

He spoke for Himself. Just like He promised a Messiah in the book of Genesis, He also spoke of an end time. Don't be fooled, God is not mocked. He will execute judgment on non-believers.


429 posted on 04/14/2006 9:20:18 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

Hey, thanks!

Most scientist who study evolution come to the realization that there is a God, although some won't admit it. But Newton and Lord Kelvin did.


430 posted on 04/14/2006 9:23:09 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: jennyp

You know, many years ago, I told my nephew that I could put clay on his skull and make him appear to be ape-like.

In the same way insects become immune to insecticides, I became immune to penicillin because I had massive doses when I was growing up. Do you think will my offspring also be immune to penicillin? Will it change their DNA?


431 posted on 04/14/2006 9:29:14 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind: it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science.

-- Lord Kelvin

432 posted on 04/14/2006 9:37:56 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
"Please fill out post 86. We evos need your guidance."

Below is post # 86. What's to fill out? Or will post # 86 gradually evolve into another post better suited to its ding-a-ling environment..

"Bravo 'atlaw' for your post #83, in response to ejroths post...I was thinking much the same as you...tho, I am sure you said it better than I could have..."

433 posted on 04/14/2006 9:51:23 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: razorbak; jennyp

First, it would have been courteous, if when copying my post #86, you would have pinged me...secondly, Jennyp, made a simple mistake...I am sure, fill out post #68, is what was meant...a simple transposing of numbers...

So, this is a ding-a-ling environment?...interesting...


434 posted on 04/14/2006 10:03:22 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Humans are apes...

Speak for yourself.

Main Entry: ape

Pronunciation: 'Ap

Function: noun

Etymology: Middle English, from Old English apa; akin to Old High German affo ape

1 a : MONKEY; especially : one of the larger tailless or short-tailed Old World forms b : any of two families (Pongidae and Hylobatidae) of large tailless semierect primates (as the chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, or gibbon) -- called also anthropoid, anthropoid ape

2 a : MIMIC b : a large uncouth person

Once I was a tadpole

Beginning to begin.

Then I was a frog

With my tail tucked in.

Then I was a monkey

swinging from a tree.

And now I'm a professor

With a PhD.

435 posted on 04/14/2006 10:07:43 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
here are the two premises on which the various theories of evolution are based:

1 - This is the evolutionary formula for making a universe:

Nothing + nothing = two elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws and a completely structured universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets, and moons orbiting in perfect balance and order.

Wrong!!!! Nothing + nothing = nothing. 0+0=0. Remains unknown and the rest is your opinion.

436 posted on 04/14/2006 10:11:01 PM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I'll stack my graduate and post graduate gradepoint, as well as my IQ against yours any day.


437 posted on 04/14/2006 10:11:08 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

When my kids are quiet I know somethings up!

You know what I wish though. I wish that I enjoyed learning things the way I do now when I was young and in college. All I had ever known at that point was school, and more school. I made good grades, but I didn't put the kind of effort into it that I should have. I had my son 9 months after graduation. My husband says he's my little graduation gift. After that I spent the next seven years changing diapers. Once my kids got to a point where I didn't have to watch them every second, I found that I just really craved mental stimulation. Now I can't stop. Homeschooling has been great fun, and educational for me because I want to learn as much as possible about everything I teach them. We've been studying ancient civilizations starting with Egypt and working our way up. We're in medieval Europe now. I get so excited that I'm pouring over the stuff and trying to get my kids as fascinated as I am. Sometimes they are. Sometimes they're like, "enough already! We wanna play!" I just wish I had been more serious, and disciplined when I was younger. I was smart enough, but I was a bit of a goof off. I could have gotten way more out of my education.


438 posted on 04/14/2006 10:18:12 PM PDT by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: razorbak
"Please fill out post 86. We evos need your guidance."

Below is post # 86. What's to fill out? Or will post # 86 gradually evolve into another post better suited to its ding-a-ling environment..

Whoops, I'm sorry, post 68. The "Ape or Human?" survey.
439 posted on 04/14/2006 10:18:45 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit
In the same way insects become immune to insecticides, I became immune to penicillin because I had massive doses when I was growing up. Do you think will my offspring also be immune to penicillin? Will it change their DNA?

What do you mean, "immune to penicillin"? Penicillin doesn't work by killing off your own cells, penicillin works by killing bacteria. Perhaps you have a strain of endemic bacteria that are now immune to penicillin, but you yourself wouldn't be.

Anyway, there's no evidence that I know of that any kind of environmental stress you encounter in your life will be passed on to your children's genes.

But there is growing evidence that you're afraid of filling out the survey in post 68. Why is that?

440 posted on 04/14/2006 10:26:01 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 681-684 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson