Insor also cited the inconclusiveness of that raw data, and cited how months afterward, George Tenent and UN David Kay still thought the labs were used to make WMD.
thats what i was going to say, can they prove Bush read the report that was only sent 2 days prior.
Why is anyone at CNN providing context? That's too much like real reporting.
We had every right to invade Iraq once they violated the treaty agreements.
We did not have to prove that WMD existed, Sadaam had to prove that they did not.
He didn't, so we had every right to remove him from power.
NOT ANOTHER REPORT ON MADE UP WMD STUFF????!?!?!?!??!
This has already been debunked and everybody got it except Nedra Picklepuss
The new rule in Washington is that if you repeat something provided to you by your top people responsible for knowing that information, you are lying.
If the attorney general tells you something is legal and you do it..only to have it questioned later... you INTENTIONALLY broke the law...regardless of the answer to the latter question.
And now this Iraqi document destroys the lies of liberal and their media reagrding Iraq WMD and President Bush.
This document below will not only back up the President side but it will destroy all the lies of liberals and their media regarding Saddam Regime WMD issue.
September 1998 Document: Secret Research Programs Related to WMD http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613509/posts
This is yet another document that proves without any doubt that Saddam Regime never stopped working in his WMD programs and Research and they were just waiting for the opportune moment to produce these WMD again on a large scale. Also please remember that in September 1998 the UN inspectors were still in Iraq and they were kicked later on that year after some US air and missile strikes. So most definitely these Secret Research Programs related to WMD were still in existence and may have reached a more advanced stage from late 1998 to late 2002 where during this period of time there were no UN inspectors in Iraq. This document is another proof that we could have never trusted Saddam and that we had all the right to remove his brutal and terrorist regime after 9/11/2001.
This document will be the antidote to the Washington Post latest LIE that there were no biological programs and it is a very powerful proof against all the lies spewed by liberals and their media for the last three years.
BUSH LIED!! MILLIONS MORE DIED!!
< /Hysterical Left >
Nedra Pickler needs to be told about Freeper jveritas' translations, which prove their were WMD. Never mind. She probably knows about them but chooses to ignore them.
I see AP still practices obfuscation with their headlines.
WP+ABC=PURE PROPAGANDA
I still can't figure out how a country whose major business is oil production, which should have the capacity to produce plenty of hydrogen gas as a by-product, would use "mobile fermentation labs" to produce hydrogen for weather baloons (which is supposedly what the experts concluded these units were for). I remember as a grad student, getting a microbiology minor along with my biochemistry Ph.D., trying to cultivate hydrogen generating microbes in the lab - It would have been much easier to buy a tank of hydrogen which is so very portable and convenient.
 |
| Two cases of arguments complete with form, content and conclusion. CASE #1 A. Five hundred reports of evidence say that Iraq had WMD. B. A mere six reports indicate Iraq didn't. C. Administration believes Iraq had WMD. Media conclusion: Iraq clearly doesn't have WMD. Administration is lying. CASE #2 |
A friend of mine was with David Kay and the ISG when they were actively looking for WMD. He tells me that over and over, they were told ( by the experts in the group ) that the trailers and bunkers they searched were sites of bio and chem WMD.
They had many hairy situations and everyone up and down the line believed , based on preliminary testing and empirical evidence that they had discovered Saddam's sites.
He is still convinced, based on his own observations and those of the experts-that they did in fact , find evidence of Saddam's WMD programs.
Poor Nedra, she's a little behind on the story, isn't she?
Or is she just gonna keep on posting it?
Have a look at the pictures of the trailers. There is no reason to put fermentation vessels (the kind that can easily mass produce bacterium like anthrax) on a railcar.
This is just disinformation by the Iraq Survey Group and the US military to discourage other nations from trying the same tactic. I understand that the CIA and the US military did not want Powell to present this information at the UN just because it would give people an insight into biological weapons production that they might not have thought of.
But the simple fact is that Saddam DID NOT use the railcars to produce anthrax and hit our troops with it. But he COULD HAVE. He had weaponized anthrax in storage and it would have only taken a week at most to produce a significant amount of anthrax that could have been used on our troops or in the city of New York.
The MSM reporters do not have the scientific knowledge to report on this issue. If they do, they are just part of the left-wing coalition against Bush.