Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: linda_22003
No, there have been plenty of nudes in art throughout history.

Apples and oranges, dear. Not to be vulgar, but how often, do you think, were men in the public squares masturbating in front of these statues?
163 posted on 04/11/2006 10:34:59 AM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals regardless of their party affiliation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus

Some men don't need an excuse to whack off in public. Many works we consider masterpieces were originally considered at least titillating or shocking, if not obscene; Edouard Manet's "Olympia" was literally scandalous in 1865, and was intended to be. John Singer Sargent had to repaint a dress strap on Madame Gautrau's portrait; it had to be exhibited as "Madame X" in order not to raise a scandal about the real model. I am sure you know these paintings; they were not always seen through 21st century eyes.

Many paintings of women "en dashibille" were only exhibited in bars and men's clubs where women would not see them. I cannot swear as to what men did in front of them, but I suppose the floors were in questionable condition for numerous reasons.

I remember the early days of Playboy, when the models were somewhat orange in color, airbrushed to the point of unreality, and showed very little compared to today. What was "naughty" in the fifties and sixties is humorous today.


178 posted on 04/11/2006 10:44:54 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson