To: Antoninus
Of course, you just read Playboy for the articles, right? What do you think their cicrulation would be today if they just published interviews and not titty pics?
Answer: 0. Yeah, that's why not a single magazine in existence has ever published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures.
143 posted on
04/11/2006 10:06:42 AM PDT by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: steve-b
Yeah, that's why not a single magazine in existence has ever published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures.
Boy am I surprised to see you on this thread. /sarc
Hefner's mag would have been one out of a thousand without the titty-pics. Why don't you rattle me off a list of the magazines which "published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures" that were around in the 1950s and still exist today?
174 posted on
04/11/2006 10:41:33 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals regardless of their party affiliation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson