Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus
Of course, you just read Playboy for the articles, right? What do you think their cicrulation would be today if they just published interviews and not titty pics?
Answer: 0.

Yeah, that's why not a single magazine in existence has ever published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures.

143 posted on 04/11/2006 10:06:42 AM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Yeah, that's why not a single magazine in existence has ever published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures.

Boy am I surprised to see you on this thread. /sarc

Hefner's mag would have been one out of a thousand without the titty-pics. Why don't you rattle me off a list of the magazines which "published interviews with substantive public figures unaccompanied by nude pictures" that were around in the 1950s and still exist today?
174 posted on 04/11/2006 10:41:33 AM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals regardless of their party affiliation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson